Leaderboard

That does not compute. Transmission concluded. 06282012 10am/7am

Please explain stupid. Do indeed post an essay of your own to confirm " The awesomeness of wayne-scales " , something worth reading i assume. Both Plato & Bach where brilliant minds & this essay journals their facts in my interpretation. I await your civilized reply. This argument is open to anyone's contribution not retribution. Transmission Concluded. 06282012 3:23AM

FYI: Less than 10% of music composers are able to make a living out of composing music without additional income. A lot of composers have other revenue streams in place too.

An accurate description of my musical career could be that of a pendulum: big creative outbursts, lasting several years, followed by a "dry spell" lasting months or even years. So yes, I can relate to the idea of a temporary "pause". I started composing during my teenage years, and got a lot of works composed between 1993 and 1998. But afterwards, as I progressed into the law school, I was no longer able to compose that much (not to mention I had to do it solely by handwriting). So the following five years (up to 2003) were totally unproductive in terms of music. However, I finally got my first notation software and my interest in composition was suddenly resurrected. Prior to 2007 I composed a number of new works and revised most of the earlier ones. But then again, I drifted away from music - this time owing to a master's degree in Europe plus a rival interest in fiction writing. By mid-2011, however, I was burning again with the desire to compose (or rather, with a lot of musical ideas becoming too much of a nuisance to keep ignoring them), and this led to my third "compositional outburst", in which I'm still living. So, don't worry, enjoy what you're doing - and rest assured that your "dry spell" will eventually end. Moreover, you're very likely to be a much better composer when you get back at it ;) .

Why are there people this stupid?

" Plato's Boring Essay " ( Diabolus et Musica ) Plato denounced music bad & effeminate music even way back then in his antique era. I can account for his analysis with an essay of my own: Evil in music is indivisible with sacred music to komplex interrelashionships unless the kompozer were to maintain the process free of impurities & finely & concretely divided excluding all the elements of one from the other in composition which ofcourse would sound very lame & constricted more than Bach's works were. Where the harmony can be kept holy, if one is not too careful or otherwise reckless, the rhythm can become haughty & indecent to contrapoint sacredness with indecent elements or pollution permeating subliminaly which one may refer to as secular infestation which easily dwells with interdictoric criteria because of it's free form & freedom & liberty that knows no boundaries of moral strictness or dicipline of the classic forms. Though a libretto or lyrical criteria may contain vulgarity, perversion, or malevolence, it is only the most bluntly outspoken undulations from the instrumental vexations as probably Plato might have concluded in his study of ethics in music as to what it is & what it will ever mean, it's definitive criteria, original meaning, & ultimate origin. Thus the 3 main known forms of all music: 1-Secular, 2-Secular Demonic, & 3-Sacred Angelic are equal in scientific power of the fundamentals & complexities thus all three indivisible as diciplined artform formulas none more creditable than the other. If one for instance aims at composing a sacred work in the scale of C Major, the devil might seep beneath it with unnoticable haughty interdictoric rhythms & thus the infestation of the impurities is still present subconsciously permeating without the awareness of the listener or performer thus planting seeds of malevolence. Surely this evil stealth is present even in the S.D.G. works of bach, his strange harmonies & haughty rhythmic patterns that the people of arnstadt,Germany complained about & the great Bach was severely reprimanded by the local authorities. :horrified: :sith: :jedi:

Dunno...spam is generally intended to sell things: Marzique I think is doing the opposite for his music.

I think you're quite a bit off in your generalizations...It is just not that simple.

I just checked, and, as it turns out, Tokke is correct: 59.25834935, not 60, is objectively the perfect tempo.

Stay in school, kids. And don't waste away your life with drugs.

Overlooking intricacies the Concepts despite contributing the cogent conceptualization of Musiotics your ideas are. I would say deriving Parallels which in itself, allowing despoiliation per se, (the Infinite within Cosmos and the Infinitesimal) disallowing Universal. It inanity is the music; Profane within compounded cannot be compared to the like and of Baroque music, the Classical neo-Romanticism. The context Beneath which of viewpoints rhombus Divine and not misconstruing integral Shifts, bijective and non-local. Relativism is blurred, "dividing by itself" another Which all Pretentiousness can muster. Therefore, Marzique, I postulate that you are wrong. --Ian Constaxulaxium Pazuria

Hey Marzique - I appreciate the time you took to write this post! Unfortunately, you have admitted that nobody will understand it. Therefore, I do not see the point of it existing here. I also would urge for you to schedule an appointment with a doctor because you seem to be a little delusional about your understanding of music.