Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/02/2012 in all areas

  1. That's called syncopation, and in this context it's not only fine but probably sounds better than straight 4's all the way through. Off-beat accents add rhythmic drive.
    2 points
  2. Yes people are defending Marzique now. RIP YC it was fun.
    2 points
  3. I had this idea this morning and would like to share with everybody. Here's the thing: - We open for subscriptions with a limited number of composers (like 10, for example); - After the limit is reached, a neutral person (moderator/reviwer which is not participating) chose by chance (or any other criterion) pairs of composers (so, we'd have 5 pairs); - Each pair will work toghether and compose a musical work, maybe following some rules or directions; - After the previously specified date, all the work is posted here! - This could also become a competition. Or not. Maybe just the collaborative work itself is enough^^. Why this all? I believe it's a good opportunity to share knowledge with other composers, learn with each other's compositional styles, techniques and ideas. If not by chance, pairs could be made by mixing composers with contrasting compositional styles, or with the same ones, or even by subscripton order (if we subscribe by PM to someone, no one knows who's in, nor the order). What do you think about it?
    1 point
  4. No! If you want to model a piece after a Chopin piece, I would definitely be ok with that. A waltz or a nocturne genre would be fine too!
    1 point
  5. It's true as far as I know. I learned about this from a reputable source before the article was posted. LilyPond is the future >.>
    1 point
  6. John Cage and such is fine. I was questioning your general poor sentence structure and lack of ability to spell simple words, as well as your general incoherence.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...