Leaderboard

Hi all! Home Economics doesn't exist anymore and The Food Network makes it look like you can't fry an egg without granite countertops, truffle oil, and a degree from culinary school. I thought I would take a basic recipe and turn it into an ear-worm. With any luck, the members of any choir that sings this and a good number of the people in the audience will remember how to make lentil soup forever. The pianist has to deal with accidentals and an irritating key signature, but the choral parts should sit comfortably for everyone, be easy to read, and it repeats, which should be user-friendly for high school chorus or amateur choral groups. How does this look? Thanks for taking a look!

I think that's what's important. If noct is the night it doesn't mean it has to be a classic accepted by all night. There are many kinds of nights and that's your night. Will give it a listen now. It does flow. The only thing that bothers me is the fact that you didn't return to your A even once after the bridge. There's a short part with all these triplets, and instead of developing it further you introduce a new material and stick to it to the end. It's not wrong, it's just like... you're not using a composer tool. If a builder won't use... say a hammer building a house, and will knock down nails with a screwdriver instead... it might work in it's own way, but the house could be better if he used the hammer instead. Ok hammer is a kind of important tool so maybe that's not the best example. You can keep it that way but, if there's anything wrong here, I think that's it. My suggestion- throw it there. It would be extremely difficult to match triplet sixteenth with normal ones, so I don't think that you should put them in the same bar. But try and mix them, it might create an interesting rhythmic feel. About throwing it there- when someone looses his ear a new one can be made in a lab (god my examples today are terrible). Even if in the beginning it won't connect, the body will accept it with time. "Save as" your file under the name "expiriment1". Now take that rhythm and just put it there, and see if you can sew it there. Ok that might have been a bad feedback, I hope you find some helpful advice in that mess.

@Rabbival507 Usually, in the beginning, you should write the position of the seven pedals in the score This is a way to do it After that, whenever a pedal changes, you have to think if they are possible. It is possible to change one pedal of each foot at a time. But it's not possible to change two pedals of the same foot at a time. There must be time enough to change it. I think harpists prefer you don't write the pedal changes (except for the initial set) because many times there are several ways to do it. Take a look: https://www.15secondharp.com/writing-for-the-harp

I think it is possible because you have 4 measures of time to change to D# C# B E# F# G# A# However, depending on the context, I would do another thing: use the enharmonic notes Your pedals afet the first part are Db Cb Bb Eb F G Ab You only have to do two changes: Db Cb Bb Eb F Gb Ab With that, you'll need to change the score. But have in mind that to change from flat to sharp the pedal needs two steps. One more thing, the Db in m. 43 should be written in the upper stave. Whenever I write for harp, I write the changes just for me to be aware if it is possible or not. Besides, you can get lost after many changes.