The entire point of most art studies today, as I was saying before, is to suppress this and not build on it.
Unique possibilities arise from a combination of older styles that are informed by natural beauty laws. These are rejected, for various political reasons, by the arts programs of basically everywhere.
That's why something like the common practice period was able to produce music that was new, but was also good. It was an outgrowth of what came before it, but atonal and serialist stuff was not. It was a rejection of it and ultimately a dead end; that's why Mozart endures and Schoenberg is limited to the realm of pseudo-intellectual "academics".
Teachers today, especially in visual arts but it's there in music too, actively discourage or even punish being in tune with the nature and past of all this, and so, no genuine creativity is allowed.
Instead, they will champion modernist trash with "something to say" as being "progress" — even though all that stuff is exactly the same as all the other "progressive" stuff that has been churned out over the last 100 years.