Wow, thank you so much to all, I'm so glad to have so many feedbacks on that tiny stuff! Lemme answer in sequence. Sorry if the message is long, you can jump straight to your part:
@Quinn : Thanks a lot for this very encouraging answer!really nice to read your kind words, and I'm grateful for the specific technical recommandations you give, they're super helpful. Thank you for taking the time to have a detailed look at the score. As you said, it could -and should probably- be longer, but it's really the second piece of music I ever wirte that is not a pure textbook exercise, so I wanted to keep it short, keep it manageable for me. Thank you veeery much for the recommandation of the legato on the semiquavers. I really lack knowledge on this kind of stuff that relates to the technicity of the player (never touched a violin in my life), and I need to build up that intuition. About the doubling of the 3d, I thought it is actually common practice to use the II-7th chord with the 3rd as a bass, and a doubling of the bass in a cadence context to "mimic" the role of the IV chord in a IV-V-I movement. Did I use that wrong?
Thanks also for pointing out the octaves in bar 26, I actually just missed that one, although it was obvious.... Damn! I'll re-work that part a bit. As to the consecutive 5th, I thought this was accepted when moving from 5th to diminished 5th. Is that wrong? Anyway, thanks a lot for those very useful comments!!
@DarrenEngland Thanks for commenting! I understand your recommandation to start slow. I think I did to some extent actually. I've been learning 4 part harmony and writing quite a few chorale exercises (also harmonizations of a given bass). Actually I'm not totally sure why you consider a string quartet as particularly challenging. In my mind, it actually seems like a somewhat straight-forward way to apply four-part harmony. Seems tailor-made for that! I know almost nothing about counterpoint yet though, and I need to work on that asap, but I just tried to write that in the meantime as a purely harmonic, counterpoint-free attempt. I totally understand your stick figure analogy! Though actually, I didn't especially feel that way on this particular music: I will post another stuff I wrote (my very first composition) which was clearly overly ambitious and which gave me much more that feeling of stick figure music. Could you give me hints on some particular points that gave you this impression? Or is it just a global indistinct feeling?
My sources so far are all in french I'm afaraid :(( I've been using textbooks and videos from a fairly respected french music teacher. I would really love to get textbook recommandations from you guys, although I'll have to learn all the linguo in english haha. I especially have weaknesses (or straight-up ignorance) on counterpoint, rythmic techniques, and overall "architecture of the piece" (i mean how to organize together individual parts that sound well on their own, how to make smooth transitions from one phrase to another, etc..). If you have material adressing those issues, that would be awesome! 🙂
@Luis Hernández Thank you! It is indeed just a short idea, a tiny project to get used to writing something that is not purely an exercise. Glad to know it sounds ok to you! It is the first time I hear the term pointillism for music haha, thanks for teaching me this!
@JorgeDavid Thanks for your appreciation and support! As said to Darren, I would love to hear some textbook recommandation from you although I have to apologize that I can't give some back to you, since all I have learned so far is in my mothertongue 😞 They were focused on 4 part harmony. You are totally right, I should definitely learn about counterpoint. It is my next step.
Thanks again for so many comments! It's really encouraging and heart-warming to feel supported by people with more experience 🙂