Thank you ! ๐ I'm happy to hear that you think I've succeeded in what I was trying to do here.
I don't think I intended it to be so "busy" when I set out to compose it. It just got composed that way haha.. I rely primarily on intuition and my experience at the piano while composing. I understand though that some parts may sound too busy to some.
This, I'm aware of. There are definitely imperfections in the recording ..And I play on a mid of the line digital piano... It does what it can. I'd like to have recorded this on a Steinway grand or something. But I won't blame it all on the piano ๐ , the pedalling required for the correct sustain in certain sections is quite tricky to pull off too and I probably messed up here and there.
I do have to mention that's exactly what I wanted though. Maybe that sounds odd, but it was the idea of contrasting themes that still flow or lead smoothly into each other but in a "one directional flow" kind of way, is what I was going for. I was actually quite sure of receiving this criticism ๐ . But yes, I purposely didn't use the common methods often used for achieving "thematic unification". For a piece that does that though (atleast I was told it does that ! ), please listen to my previous piece "The drifting waltz" on my channel.
Ravel is my favourite composer. I've played Ondine and I could not dream of achieving that level of awesomeness and perfection haha. ( I have a performance of his Jeux d'eau on my channel too if you'd like to hear). I must have heard Gaspard de la Nuit countless times, its an absolutely untouchable masterpiece. Us mortals can only aspire to that level. Ravel has talked about how his first goal was achieving technical perfection. He certainly did or got as close to it as a human could !
I want to really thank you for your critique. Its always nice to get some detailed feedback. Gives me something to work with. I'm glad you still enjoyed the pieces despite its imperfections ๐