maybe, or maybe not, i would say. not sure about your piece specifically. i have never studied music in a university - well, I took some sort of music appreciation class once to fulfill an elective requirement, choosing one in music so that I could fulfill that elective buy studying MUSIC instead of something else, quite the good show by my college for allowing that, some classmates once asking me to take it easy on a test that was to be graded on a curve in view of the fact that I knew more - but not so much more - than the jazzes and pop music aficionados in that class happened to know. One thing that I knew, which I'll bet anyone in this thread also knows, and that I type up to refine my thinking a bit on such mattes as well as assuring myself on my ideas - is that the 'prohibition' of parallel fifths (and octaves) grew out of an early desire (requirement actually) to keep contrapuntal lines separate and not allow then to blend together into undistinguishable lines at any moment of paralell-ness, such knowledge for myself being obtained from study of Fux, Piston, Jeppesen, Mann, Schoenberg. Parallel fifth and octave combos of tones can be quite nice and effective when used in the right way. For instance, when playing through parts of Debussy's "Suite bergamasque" - those parts NOT concerned with the moon - I found paralell fifths that sound wonderful; Menuet I opening bar.
the above could be thought of as a long winded into this question: what is the common pathway, if any, that is followed these days in achieving a level of compositional ability needed for obtaining the all important degree. Is Bach always intently studied? what else is?