Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/08/2025 in all areas

  1. Sounds great. It seems a little strange to me when these systems are used on forms or structures that we have strongly associated with tonal writing.
    1 point
  2. Wow, that notation is tricky to read. So my comments will be only from listening observations. The invention itself awesome, but I'm not sure the microtones were as effective here as your last piece. However, I was having a hard time figuring out if you changed key at around 0:30. It sounds like a slight key change, or a "micro" key change perhaps 😄. Either way, a very harmonically interesting invention, and I like how you change the range from mid, to high to low. I would have never guessed the range of the harpsichord to be that limited though and I probably would have made the same mistake.
    1 point
  3. The tempo should be slightly slower in my opinion. The reason for this, is so that the ear can hear the melodies more clearly. It's a really nice fugue though, much better than the Chopin fugue I literally just roasted 😆. This one is much more harmonically interesting. Between the harpsichord vs and piano version, I prefer harpsichord because I feel it offers more clarity (which is unusual because normally I prefer piano). BTW, the harpsichord sounds a little out of tune. Was this the samples you were using, or did you mess around with the tuning? Some notable parts of your piece Intro: Very strong subjects 0:35: Nice chord progressions! 1:04: really interesting rhythms here 2:05: beautiful return to your subjects 2:40: that fun rhythm from 1:04, was brought back, which I like Overall, this is a very beautiful fugue, that just needs a slight tempo decrease.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...