Leaderboard

Thanks to all 12 participants who submitted music to the competition - the recipients of the "Landscapes - Soundscapes - Participant" Award! Padovana et Gagliarda “Detta la Lombarda” by @L.S Barros Amidst the Clouds & Flowers by @InstrumentalistElle Sacrificed to the Wilderness by @Fruit hunter Morning On Whidbey Island by @BipolarComposer Spring Submission “Rainy Weather” by @therealAJGS Chinese Fugue by @TristanTheTristan Sunset Suite in C minor by @Musicman_3254 City Rail and Nightingale by @Wieland Handke Alishan (for Flute Quintet) by @HoYin Cheung "Warmth" by @UncleRed99 The Voyage of a Lone Ship by @ferrum.wav Lamentare Ciobanului - “The Shepherd’s Lament” by @ComposaBoi The members have voted! --==<< Decisive Fanfare! >>==-- And the winners are: For winning the "Rustic Mood" Award with 9 votes - Padovana et Gagliarda "Detta la Lombarda" by @L.S Barros will receive the following badge: For winning the "Nature's Garden" Award with 10 votes - Amidst the Clouds & Flowers by @InstrumentalistElle will receive the following badge: For winning the "Peace of Nature" Award with 6 votes - Morning On Whidbey Island by @BipolarComposer will receive the following badge: For winning the "Nature and Civilization" Award with 9 votes - City Rail and Nightingale by @Wieland Handke will receive the following badge: For winning the "Forest Echoes" Award with 5 votes - Alishan (for Flute Quintet) by @HoYin Cheung will receive the following badge: For winning the "Home and Hearth" Award with 9 votes - “Warmth” by @UncleRed99 will receive the following badge: For winning the "Pastorale" Award with 8 votes - Lamentare Ciobanului - “The Shepherd’s Lament” by @ComposaBoi will receive the following badge: For winning 3rd Place overall with 8 points - City Rail and Nightingale by @Wieland Handke will receive the following trophy: For winning 2nd Place overall with 9 points - we have a tie! Padovana et Gagliarda "Detta la Lombarda" by @L.S Barros and Amidst the Clouds & Flowers by @InstrumentalistElle will receive the following trophy: For winning 1st Place overall with 16 points - The Voyage of a Lone Ship by @ferrum.wav will receive the following trophy: Congratulations to all the winners! We will now move your pieces to the "Competition Hall of Fame" sub-forum! And thanks to all the following participants who also reviewed all the entries! The contest would not have been as much fun and as instructional as it was without you! The following members will receive the "Heavyweight Reviewer" badge for reviewing 100% of the entries (12) submitted to the competition! @Luis Hernández, @Kvothe, @Henry Ng Tsz Kiu, @chopin, @Wieland Handke, @ComposaBoi, @ferrum.wav, @PeterthePapercomPoser, and @Tónskáld And the following members will receive the "Welterweight Reviewer" badge for reviewing 66% of the entries (8) submitted to the competition! And the following members will receive the "Featherweight Reviewer" badge for reviewing 33% of the entries (4) submitted to the competition! @TristanTheTristan, @HoYin Cheung, @Fruit hunter, and @UncleRed99 Thank you to all 13 Ardent Reviewers who reviewed the contest entries! This is perhaps the first time that the number of reviewers exceeded the number of contestants! Great turnout people! And thanks for me @PeterthePapercomPoser for organizing and managing all the competition polls, announcements, submission thread, badges, results, satisfaction survey and advertising outreach! I will receive the "Community Organizer" badge! To take the Landscapes - Soundscapes Satisfaction Survey go here: To listen to all the entries go to the submission thread: To check out all the popular voting polls go here: And for the competition announcement go here:

Here's my analysis of the three aspects you requested (harmony, orchestration, and interpretation). I've organized this post accordingly. Harmony Strengths: You use layered tones very well, especially in the strings, bassoon/contrabassoon, and brass. For example, the opening sul pont immediately creates a tense atmosphere that really suits your subject. Key Improvement Areas: There is too much harmonic stasis. We spend too much time hovering in dominant or tonic pedal harmonies without much meaningful movement beneath. Yes, these pedal harmonies go a long way to create atmosphere, but they also delay any sense of harmonic identity or direction. Even when the Allegro arrives, the harmonic palette doesn't change substantially, the texture just gets busier and louder. We are moved rhythmically but not harmonically. Suggestions: Consider using long pedal sections more strategically, with chromatic shifts in the held bass tones. These can create a lot of drama without adding rhythmic complexity. You might also consider employing modal harmonies, like Dorian or Phrygian, to evoke Central Asian/Siberian folk music traditions in a way your current diatonic approach cannot. Orchestration Strengths: Percussion! You use this section very creatively and imaginatively, and the intricate instructions and directions signal real knowledge of percussion techniques. The bowed vibraphone and screaming gong are great examples of thinking outside the box to achieve your desired effect. Key Improvement Areas: The greatest issue facing this piece is balance and crowding of registers. For example, in full orchestra passages, nearly every instrument is playing forte (or louder), and most are in similar registers simultaneously. In an actual performance, this will create a wall of undifferentiated sound rather than the textured climax you're looking for. Moreover, most of the instrument families tend to do the same thing together throughout the piece. The brass, for example, play similar rhythmic figures at the same time in your climactic sections. Same with the strings; there's a lot of doubling with the other string members. Suggestions: Stagger instruments' entries, especially with the brass, to improve timbral clarity. For the woodwinds, try not to write at the high end of their registers during climactic passages (except maybe the flute and piccolo - oboe and clarinet will become fatigued much more quickly), as they'll have to play extremely loudly to be heard. The violas are particularly underused in this piece, although all the strings sort of play the same thing most of the time. See what you can do to give each member its own line. Interpretation/Coherence Strengths: You employ strong structural ideas to frame this myth. Section I (Adagio minaccioso) is environmental and mythic. Section II (Allegro) is growling and rhythmic. Section III (Andante sonoro e vellutato) is the emotional heart of the piece. Sections IV-V (Moderato minaccioso) return us to a more aggressive character. Ending with an abrupt silence is good instinct! Key Improvement Areas: The Allegro goes on for too long, with the same rhythmic textures enduring for about 50 measures. On the other hand, the Andante should be longer. The lyrical woodwind-writing here is especially intimate, which suits the first-person encounter. If this is indeed the point of human contact, it deserves more development! Finally, the piece's emotional trajectory is loud --> quieter/lyrical --> loud again --> louder. This means the piece ends on its most intense moment... climactically dynamic, but it may obscure the mythological/encounter narrative you're going for. Suggestions: Consider giving the Allegro section an internal arc to give it more character (maybe the creature stops and listens, or there's an external threat that suddenly appears). Also, if the first-person encounter is meant to be the core of the story, consider whether that last section is a return to the environmental myth-telling perspective or if it's a different kind of confrontation. All in all, this is an ambitious work with a strong programmatic concept and some real moments of orchestral imagination (especially the percussion)! Thanks for sharing with us. Best, Jordan

Hi, Kyle. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 9 7 9 7 8 9 9 9 8.4 Melodies/Themes/Motives: Your sense of melody and themes is exquisite! I found this to be simple and unobtrusive in all the best ways. I especially enjoyed how you used the mere addition of instruments to build on the sound, gradually and to great effect, as your themes wove around each other. Simply beautiful. Harmony/Chords/Textures: Similarly, the harmony was simple but effective. There was enough counterpoint and differing harmonic motion to keep it interesting - and to tell the "story" you were trying to convey. The single issue I took was at m. 57 when we enter what appeared to be an authentic cadence (an A) only to be jerked into a C major, which did not hit my ears the right way (no matter how many times I listened to it). Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece had a wonderful flow to it, easily ebbing into sweeping thematic passages where the melody/theme was passed from instrument to instrument. The themes were repeated throughout, but with enough variation that it was (to me) the perfect blend of recognizable and unrecognizable. And the pacing... spot on! Originality/Creativity: This wasn't the most original thing I've ever heard, but it was adequately different that I could likely distinguish it from other ambient soundtracks. Score Presentation: The score was above average, I'd say. I think there was overuse of some articulations - particularly the marcato - when the instrument's natural sound would likely suffice. I also felt the score was too crowded in many places. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: There were no issues with playability noted. The writing seemed mostly idiomatic, with some attention given to each instrument. Execution of Given Challenge: This was very programmatic music and the identified landscape was, to me, easily felt in the music. Taste: The music was well-constructed and flowed beautifully. It was, perhaps, too homophonic for my usual tastes, but it was good music, nonetheless. Very nice job! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Please fill out the survey to help us organize better competitions in the future! The survey is anonymous so we won't be able to see who voted for what. The poll closes on 6/16/2026. Thanks for voicing your opinion!

This is a project I have slowly worked on for about a year. Thoughts/comments/criticisms welcome. Edit: I have cleaned the scores up a lot. Prelude No 1.mp3Prelude No 2.mp3Prelude No 3.mp3Prelude No 4.mp3Prelude No 5.mp3Prelude No 6.mp3Prelude No 7.mp3Prelude No 8.mp3Prelude No 9.mp3Prelude No 10.mp3 Prelude No. 1.pdf Prelude No. 2.pdf Prelude No. 3.pdf Prelude No. 4.pdf Prelude No. 5.pdf Prelude No. 6.pdf Prelude No. 7.pdf Prelude No. 8.pdf Prelude No. 9.pdf Prelude No. 10.pdf

Cool piece! I love how your atonal technique makes these "glassy" sounding chords, thin and angular, and the juxtaposition with a more traditional tonal sound is neat. I really think you could absolutely take this idea farther. For example, you have the sections completely separated -- I wonder what would happen if the atonal sections had moments of consonance, and/or vice versa? This atonality is quite gentle and agreeable, and consequently, I think it would be relatively easy to mix the two. Thank you for sharing!

its kinda rare for me to wake up and immediately try to respond to a comment first thing in the morning, but here we are i disagree. i'd argue the empty spaces are there to let the music breathe, and i have considered of keeping the "movement" going in one way or the other, either by the piano playing scales, rapid lines, the syncopated triplets, arpeggiando on the strings, timpani rhythms, etc. also, i dont think every empty space has to be filled with motivic movement. does every piece has to have a melody "naked"? and i pretty sure have varied the harmony and texture. the first introduction to the full theme its literally just pizz. string and high register piano playing 6th broken up (which adds movement, by the way), the repeat of which (b.194) just removes the piano entirely, the first entrance of the second theme is played by cello only, with piano and pizz violin to accentuate the syncopated rhythm, the measures before that is another thinning of textures after a loud section, etc etc. i mean, i like it, so...oh well lol yeah, the themes are long and therefore had to be repeated. however, if i cut those repetitions the themes wouldnt be prominent. hell i did in fact cut the first theme in the repetition. most of the systems include 2-4 bars, with the exception of a few bars where there are few notes to play. i do not think crowding is an issue here. response: added references: and probably more. i couldnt find anything outside facebook discussions to be honest. HOWEVER, most of the chamber pieces including a piano that i've score read have the non-piano instruments be in smaller staves. response: also note, i'd rather have a seemingly impossible part and have to revise them after some feedbacks than not using the instruments to its fullest potential. part of why i fell in love with classical music is that you can get SO MUCH out of one singular instrument. the fact that composers have exploited many ways out of an instrument to serve their vision is so fascinating to me. maybe its innocent for me to think that way. of course, you have to consider the performer and the rehearsal, but, im gonna be real, i dont think this piece is ever gonna be performed. AND, if it was, or if i were to compose a piece that WILL be performed, then yes, i'll absolutely not go overboard and stuff, strip down the techniques, and be more lenient with them. this DOES NOT mean i do not think of idiomatic writing (refer to the my quoted response). also 6 bars of left hand open strings pizzicato played near the edge of the fingerboard is impossible? but, as all art are, it comes down to taste. so, fair enough thanks for the comments!!!

Hi, Jonathon. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 7 6 7 7 7 8 9 7 7.3 Melodies/Themes/Motives: I noted a couple of melodies/themes in this piece that recurred in varying voices and keys - and you even altered the note lengths to improve the variability. I can tell you've improved a lot in this area since a few years ago (when I was last active on the site)! There were some issues with voice leading, though, where the melody became overshadowed by supporting voices. Harmony/Chords/Textures: You had some good ideas here and I could tell what you were trying to do, but I think that, unfortunately, it fell flat in some places. I liked that the piece didn't stay in one key but instead wandered around into others. I especially loved the polychords (for example, in m. 67) that resolved to the tonic. However, the harmonic motion otherwise felt a bit stale, with too much parallel movement, and many of the tonal centers shifted without effective cadences. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece was well-structured and had good development. The emergence of the various themes was handled well, I thought, and they changed voices and timbres throughout. I did feel that the piece suffered a little from poor pacing, where the repeated themes left me wishing for something different. Originality/Creativity: I felt this was sufficiently original, though musically it was relatively tame. Score Presentation: The score was adequate. I felt like it needed a little more spacing in places, but the articulations and directions were nice and succinct. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: This piece is very playable. I do question the choice of English horn (other than for its pastoral vibe, I suppose), since you wrote in the range of the oboe, but, aside from that, everything seems to be written idiomatically. Execution of Given Challenge: The piece did an excellent job capturing the quotidian joys (and worries) of being a Carpathian shepherd. Great work! Taste: Sure, the piece wasn't the best it could have been, but I nevertheless found it quite enjoyable. I'm impressed at how much you've matured as a composer in the past couple of years! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, HoYin. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 5 6 6 7 9 6 5 5 6.2 Melodies/Themes/Motives: While there were themes and motives present throughout, the melodic writing was unconvincing and never supported by harmonic structure beneath. This made the piece seem to lack musical direction, instead sounding like a mixture of competing and unrelated themes. Harmony/Chords/Textures: There was no effective use of cadential structure that I could find, causing the piece to swing randomly from one key to the next. Harmonic motion was varied and there was counterpoint throughout, which helped give the piece some substance. The textures, I felt, were too random, with the strings and flute dropping and changing registers frequently and with abandon. Form/Development/Structure/Time: Aside from verbatim repeated themes, sometimes in different keys, the piece didn't really have any development. It seemed to be in a hurry to get somewhere from start to finish, but nothing seemed to serve a purpose. There was nothing predictable or patterned in the music, it just sort of... happened. Originality/Creativity: You've been around on this forum long enough for me to recognize your style, and this piece was no different. However, nothing in this submission stood out to me as new or exciting (it sounded a lot like other pieces of yours I've heard). Score Presentation: Very nicely done, nearly professional quality. I noted some hairpins and crescendos that lacked dynamics, as well as an overabundance of articulations, but those were mostly negligible issues. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: There are too many stops in the string parts, and while they're likely playable, many of them will require rolling or arpeggiation to execute, which disrupts the flow of the quick tempo. You also have passages that swap very quickly from pizz. to arco, even some in the middle of stops (like m. 143 in the 2nd violin). These may not be impossible to perform, but they increase the difficulty of the piece (and, in my opinion, not justifiably so). Execution of Given Challenge: This didn't feel like anything in particular to me. Taste: As far as soundscapes go, this is a compelling piece. I, however, prefer more structure and stronger melodic involvement and development. Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Wieland. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 8 7 7 9 9 6 8 6 7.5 Melodies/Themes/Motives: The melodies were purely mimetic (i.e., attempting to portray the actual sounds in music rather than an emotional interpretation or representation) and therefore did not lend themselves to good melodic writing. Nevertheless, your use of themes and motives was very strong throughout, as meticulously noted in your score. Harmony/Chords/Textures: On the one hand, you employed a couple of devices - tremolos and trills - to depict the train's acceleration and birdcalls, which was innovative. This texture, though, began to feel overused after a couple minutes into the piece. Because this piece was more onomatopoeia than programmatic music, the harmonies you used felt arbitrary. Moreover, the use of actual chords in this piece was more limited than what I thought at first listen; a great number of lines was doubled by another instrument, either in unison or at some octave above or below. All in all, I felt that the five instruments you used were "under tuned" for a piece of this caliber. Form/Development/Structure/Time: There was good structure to this piece, though, again, because the piece was onomatopoeic, it didn't truly develop as much as it simply progressed from theme to theme. The break in tempo roughly midway through was appreciated, but the piece ironically lacked any sense of motion (to me, at least); the glue holding this together were the descriptive texts in the score that very unsubtly described what each motif was meant to portray. Without the score, the piece becomes a soundscape of seemingly disjointed musical themes abruptly changing from one to the next. However... from an objective standpoint, that you are able to conceive of these things in your mind and then organize them into musical sections is quite extraordinary. Originality/Creativity: I've not heard anything similar to this, and even if I don't agree with your choice of chords and harmonies, this is a voice that is your own, and for that, you get the highest marks. Score Presentation: Meticulous and thorough. Very close to professional quality, though a little crowded and over-articulated at various places for my taste. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: In my opinion, this is the piece's weakest aspect, though I do not wish to be harsh here. I strongly question the decision to use two pianos, when for the vast majority of the piece, they either A) do not play simultaneously, or B) when playing simultaneously, they do not use all four hands. Furthermore, the string parts frequently double either each other or one of the piano parts. Taken altogether, this suggests that the piece could be more succinctly written for a smaller ensemble, such as a piano trio (violin, cello, and piano). The 13/16 time signature present for most of the piece is already difficult to count out and, when coupled with the onomatopoeic nature of the themes, makes me wonder if perhaps an ametric approach would be more appropriate. Lastly, but maybe most importantly, the string parts do not add much to the piece, which is carried entirely by the movement in one (or both, at times) of the piano parts. It might have helped to give the strings some passages without the piano also playing. Execution of Given Challenge: Again, I have to award high marks here simply because of how well you put this together. There's no question as to what your music depicts! Taste: I lean strongly into the impressionist camp and, I suppose by definition, do not take much interest in mimetic music. I would normally give music like this a much lower score, but your command of tone and texture makes this considerably more enjoyable. Nice work! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Musicbro456. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 6 7 7 7 3 3 8 6 5.9 Melodies/Themes/Motives: Great use of themes and melody in this submission! There were, unfortunately, quite a few issues with voice leading in which the solo viola would be completely drowned out or washed out amid the surrounding chordal textures, but your themes were solid... if a bit repetitive. Harmony/Chords/Textures: There was not a lot of harmonic movement: the piece remained mostly in G minor with some C minor chords sprinkled throughout, which sapped it of most of its harmonic strength. I noted excursions to D minor and A minor, as well... perhaps a journey along the circle of fifths? I felt your use of dynamics was compelling; emotional swells followed by quiet, captivating moments. This was good work! Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece had great "bones." You effectively worked in several motifs that reappeared when expected, and the whole thing worked to a climax at rehearsal mark IV, followed by a denouement and resolution. The music really told a story. Originality/Creativity: The fact that you chose viola as the solo instrument gives you several more points in this category (I am a violist). Jokes aside, the instrumentation and musicality was, I felt, sufficiently original. I can tell you're trying to develop your own voice. Score Presentation: The score was chaotic and, at times, nonsensical. For example, it starts out with dynamics markings "mf expression," which perhaps was intended to mean espressivo. There were modulations to key signatures that were unnecessary. The note stems were randomly in different voices rather than all the same voice. The score was also very crowded in places, with directions from one staff bleeding over into the one above or below it. For some reason, solo viola was written in the treble clef, even though the viola section was in the alto clef and had higher notes written for their part. It's conventional to split the violins into two sections - violin I and violin II - but here they remained undivided. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: There were multiple serious problems noted here. The solo viola would undoubtedly become overwhelmed by the divisi strings accompanying it in well over half the passages of this piece. Furthermore, the viola section was more technically challenging than the solo viola part, which is unconventional (but not illegal). There were also multiple passages intended to be played at an octave or double octave above what was written, some of which is technically impossible, especially at the dynamics supplied. It would probably help you in the future if you dedicated some time to learning how to write for strings. Execution of Given Challenge: This was solid, programmatic music, in my opinion, and sufficiently reminiscent of the blazing glory - and eventual hushed quiet - of a sunset. Taste: I liked what you were going for! I think your writing could be helped dramatically with more attention to music theory and (in this case) string part writing. Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Chenfeng. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 4 5 4 6 5 N/A 0 4 4.0 Melodies/Themes/Motives: No real sense of melody was present, and themes/motives were simply repeated with little to no variation. Harmony/Chords/Textures: The piece remained in A major; in fact, it was largely just one A major chord. There was a brief transition to E major but without an effective cadence, this felt contrived and a bit jarring. Harmonic movement featured an overuse of parallel motion and therefore felt stagnant. Form/Development/Structure/Time: Despite the title, this was not a fugue; there was no subject or species. There was little development noted and owing to an utter lack of cadences or breaths, the music felt monotonous to me. Originality/Creativity: This submission was, perhaps, different than most other entries; however, I didn't feel it did anything to distinguish itself from existing traditional Chinese music nor did it adequately take on the composer's voice. Score Presenation: The score was readable, but no dynamics and very few articulations were supplied. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: I do not feel qualified to evaluate this criterion, as I know next to nothing about traditional Chinese instruments or how they're played. Execution of Given Challenge: Unfortunately, the submission did not meet the competition's time length criterion. But length notwithstanding, I did not feel this piece evoked the image supplied (aside from the fact than both artists performed in traditional Chinese media). Taste: I love fugues, but this piece was merely pentatonic writing that had very little color. It sadly did not pique my interest. However, I think with more dedication to voice leading and harmonic movement, you'll drastically improve your writing style! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

just incase i need to review my own piece for that heavyweight badge Melodies Themes Motives 0 Harmony Chords Textures 0 Form Development Structure Time 0 Originality Creativity 0 Score Presentation 0 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 0 Execution of Given Challenge 0 Taste 0 Average Score: 0 this sucks never compose again

i'd say this piece does a good job at portraying a somber afternoon. the simple viola melody guides the piece straightforwardly while the accompaniment of the orchestra stills. the score is a bit confusing to read, i feel: random ottava lines, inverted beams of the notes.i also question the playability of some of the violins passages but overall, its not bad!! some of the contrasts work well and they're effective! good jobb Melodies Themes Motives 8 Harmony Chords Textures 3 Form Development Structure Time 5 Originality Creativity 3 Score Presentation 5 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 4 Execution of Given Challenge 5 Taste 3 Average Score: 4.5

this piece has that anger, yknow? thatof one losing a sheep and getting angry and sad, a cycle of grief. speaking of, it kinda represents the stages of grief, with the acceptance at the end. i imagine the contrast in this piece is like this shepherd, high in the mountain and he's mad to himself, alone, with nothing but his taragot. the different sections are distinguishable and the pacing is enjoyable. the contrasts between the sections are prominent and surprised me a bit sometimes lol. the theme and instrumentation certainly helps with this. its distinctive and full of characteristics. those low C string cello notes are powerfullll, same with the english horn and the high E string violin (again, effective contrast). absolutely using the instruments at their advantage me love chromaticsm porridge. the use of dissonance is very effective!!! the piece has a wide array of the dissonance range (soft to hard dissonances) and its usage is appropriate. i highkey like this piece Melodies Themes Motives 10 Harmony Chords Textures 10 Form Development Structure Time 10 Originality Creativity 8 Score Presentation 10 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 10 Execution of Given Challenge 10 Taste 8 Average Score: 9.5

Hello @ferrum.wav , thank you for your kindly review of my piece. I’m pleased that you could follow the imagination and story I wanted to depict musically! Since there was still plenty of space on the score, I decided to follow the example of @Henry Ng Tsz Kiu 's “Joking Fugue on Jingle Bell …", which also includes such humorous comments ... Yes, that’s right. Even though this is a new composition for the competition, I just started to compose the piece for piano solo (to include it in my collection of preludes and fugues) and then „enriched“ the piece with the further instrumentation by the strings. Therefore, the main texture is performed by the piano(s) alone and the strings serve to create more „color“ or „soundscapes“. However, there is a theme or motif in the “Nightingale” B section, played by the strings (measures 35–37 by the cello and measures 44–47 by the violin), that does not appear in the prelude for solo piano.

Hi, Elle. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 5 7 5 8 10 6 4 5 6.25 Melodies/Themes/Motives: The melodic writing was almost nonexistent, instead replaced with chordal columns that seemed to go nowhere. There was motivic or thematic development; however, in my opinion, not enough was done to clearly distinguish such themes, and the result was rather muddied and obfuscated. Harmony/Chords/Textures: Not much triadic/diatonic harmony (which is fine by me), and the tonal palette employed was used quite effectively. In my opinion, the harmonic structure could have been improved if the harmonic progressions were more consistent rather than seemingly random. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece was beautifully textured but the long, sustained notes (often in harmonics and/or stops) were frequently syncopated and combined into rapidly altering time signatures. The structural ambiguity is not helped by the lack of discernible musical patterns (I can tell there are patterns from looking at the score, but not by listening or playing). Originality/Creativity: I found this to be exotic and refreshing, and very much unlike other submissions. Score Presenation: The score was flawless. Excellent job! Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: The piece was chock full of stops and harmonics, had nebulous time signatures, maintained no clear rhythm, and possessed copious amounts of syncopation. The detailed score helps a great deal with interpretation, but the piece still emerged as agonizingly difficult to perform. Execution of Given Challenge: While beautiful and evocative, this piece brings to mind etherealness and aimless wandering - not the grandeur of the Zhangjiajie mountains (nor the flora sprinkled at their peaks). Taste: I enjoy non-diatonic harmonies, which your submission employed. However, I felt that the musical effects were too "on-the-nose"; i.e., you overused harmonics to evoke a sense of floating in the clouds and the "going-nowhere" harmonies made the piece a bit too stagnant - at least for my tastes. Still, your submission was very impressive and I think you're someone the music world should keep their eye on! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

There's many different ways to analyze pieces, so really, that's entirely up to you. For example, find a piece of music that you absolutely love. One of your favorites. Listen along with a score of the music. You could ask yourself any of the following questions: "What is it about this piece I love so much? Why did the composer/song writer choose this chord, or voice the chord this way? Why did the composer develop their material this way? The composer changed direction here -- why, and to what effect? What kind of thing(s) is the composer trying to express?" My word here, "analyze," sounds like dissecting a frog in a lab to understand its biological function. And you can literally analyze a piece, and assign all the chords and progressions, "this is the tonic, the dominant, subdominant, here's a lydian scale, etc." But simply mindful listening and meditating on what you're hearing, along with experimentation to see what works and what doesn't, goes a long way.

i definitely can paint a landscape with this piece!! from the mechanical movements of the historical train to a stroll along a garden complex, it encapsulates the journey effectively. i like the depiction of the moving train itself using the tremolos and the wandering upward melody line. that upward melody line here signifies a "progress" i think? the B section is about taking a stroll through a garden complex and i notice it being used there but slowed down. the contrast between machines and nature is very clear: the mechanical dissonant of the old train and railway machinery is contrasted against the light wandering melody of the B section. the nightingale depiction with the trills is also neat. i wish the strings got a more prominent presence here!! theyre mainly used as a doubling with a piano and overshadowed by the two pianos imo. those low thirds on the cello (b8) might be difficult. its fun to read the score because how the programme is woven into it. i like reading what one passage is supposed to represent. and lastly, the story is just so simple yet warm. you take an old historical train in the evening to a garden and notice some nightingales, d'awwwww how cozy and nice i love itttt Melodies Themes Motives 8 Harmony Chords Textures 8 Form Development Structure Time 10 Originality Creativity 9 Score Presentation 8 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 10 Execution of Given Challenge 10 Taste 8 Average Score: 8.9 end note: how i feel when describing the story

I think you have a lot of natural talent and creativity. Attending a class for something is nice, and can be really helpful, but there's really no substitute for just doing something and seeing and hearing for yourself what works, and what doesn't. Listening to and analyzing what other composers have done is an incredible education in and of itself. It's impressive that you wrote this in such a playable and natural way! I hope you hold on to this colorful whimsy, too. Thanks for sharing! This was a lot of fun to listen to.

Just a little update on reviewers and their reviews: @TristanTheTristan you've done 6 reviews - you need 2 more to get the Welterweight Reviewer badge, otherwise you will be a Featherweight Reviewer @ferrum.wav you've also done 6 and need 2 more for Welterweight @HoYin Cheung you've done 5 and need 3 more for Welterweight @Fruit hunter you've done 7 and need 1 more for Welterweight @UncleRed99 you've done 4 and qualify for Featherweight Reviewer

Title MelodiesThemes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste AVG The Voyage of a Lone Ship 9 9 7.8 9.8 9.5 7.8 4.5 9.6 8.37 Overall, you did a really good job with the piece the one gripe I only have though is just some of the double stops in quadruple stops could be impossible. You did a really good job of storytelling. The reason why i tanked your execution score Just like all the other responses, this exceeds the eight minute maximum however though I must give where credit credit is due as I think that the nine minutes was all enjoyable and wasn’t a huge problem musically This is a good story, but it doesn’t correspond to a specific landscape strongly but anyways good work

i like the usage of chinese instruments here. definitely unique and original. i will choose to not grade the playability since i do not know the intricacies. the score is definitely readable, but it lacks a lot of things (dynamics, articulation, etc.). the resulting look is very bare. i could not hear any memorable/distinct themes/subjects as they are not presented well. sure, there are contrapuntal lines, but they are just that, lines. without noticeable melodies to cling onto, the lines fall flat imo. one can probably notice upon further score inspection (or multiple listens), but i do have to consider the first couple of listening experience as well. furthermore, i couldnt associate the piece with the given pictures, other than it sounds chinese. the piece leans heavily into pentatonic, but there is also no clear harmonic direction. it feels aimless. good contrapuntal writing though! Melodies Themes Motives 2 Harmony Chords Textures 2 Form Development Structure Time 3 Originality Creativity 7 Score Presentation 4 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability N/A Execution of Given Challenge 3 Taste 2 Average Score: π (3.14, not the exact value of the pi decimal preceding it, but still lol)

Hello It’s quite a pleasant piece. But I agree. There’s some technical issue I’m not aware of, but it all sounds very unbalanced. On another note, I don’t know what your background or training is. But I think there are certain pitfalls we all fall into when we’re beginners (and even until we’ve gained enough experience). And that is: we put a large orchestra on paper (or screen) and think that by filling it up as much as possible, we’re orchestrating. But that’s not how it works. I think your first orchestrations should be with small, chamber orchestras.

Entry: Lamentare Ciobanului - “The Shepherd’s Lament” by @ComposaBoi Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 8.5 Average Score: 9.81 Review: Great job! I think your use of space in this piece really helps paint the picture of a lone shepherd in the mountains like you intended. The cello solo near the beginning of the piece followed by the English Horn solo with underlying soft pizzicato chords really sets a very tranquil and pastoral vibe. I feel like your musical voice has matured since the last time I’ve heard. There is a very beautiful use of unresolved non-harmonic tones or extended harmony in this piece. The melody very often emphasizes the 7th or 9th of the underlying harmony on a weak beat which I find very affecting. Well done! Thanks for your participation and I hope you win the “Pastorale” award that I created specifically for this piece!

Entry: Morning On Whidbey Island by @BipolarComposer Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 8 8 8.5 9 10 10 10 9 Average Score: 9.06 Review: Very nice tone painting here! I think the picture and the music match very well. The use of space is very effective here, conveying the peace and tranquility of the scene. The music is a sort of mosaic of the photo you took. It’s literally a still landscape. As a result it’s not really trying to develop or tell a story. There is definitely a recognizable theme but it’s not developed by roaming into foreign keys - it’s mood music that intends on sustaining the vibe that it creates while staying musically interesting (as a secondary priority). For this reason, some might say that the harmony might be a little static and the development stilted. But I don’t think every piece has to have a traditional western harmonic development. Thanks for your participation and I hope you win “The Peace of Nature” award which I created specifically for this piece!

Entry: Amidst the Clouds & Flowers by @InstrumentalistElle Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 7 8 9 10 9 10 10 9 Average Score: 9.00 Review: Wonderful piece! One has to be a very active listener to catch all the programmatic allusions that you intended to have in the piece. I feel it would have helped if you had given the listener a breakdown using timestamps of what’s intended to happen and when. Also, something that didn’t help is that the score is very difficult to follow, and also isn’t labeled with any of the intended programmatic meanings of the music. In order to really try to hear the events you intended in the music I had to just let myself listen and get my head out of the score which wasn’t helping me. It’s a very ethereal piece, much like the mountains you sought to portray. I personally heard a hint of John Williams when the garden melody first comes in at the beginning in the cello I believe. Thanks for your participation and I hope you win the “Nature’s Garden” award which I created specifically for this piece!

Entry: Padovana et Gagliarda “Detta la Lombarda” by @L.S Barros Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 7 7 8.5 7 9.5 10 10 8.5 Average Score: 8.44 Review: Beautiful writing that certainly does paint a scene/landscape! And it does this despite, or maybe because of the fact that it’s a pair of dances! I can totally imagine this playing in a medieval court or at a rustic Italian tavern of some sort. It would also go really well in an RPG game in that kind of medieval location. For me the soundfonts sound quite good as I am not a connoisseur of medieval instruments so I can’t tell the difference. I think this rendition of the piece is quite sufficient for the competition and for letting us appreciate the intent of the composer. I don’t know how different it would sound if it were played by a historically accurate ensemble. I think that having two parts to the composition - one relatively slow and the other fast - is quite a good choice to provide the listener some variety. The music with its varying tempi could be used to accompany quite a few different rustic scenes. Besides a tavern I can also imagine a rustic town of Lombardy (or whatever - I don’t know if that town actually exists). Or some kind of castle in the Italian mountains and all the bustling activity at said town/castle. It is quite exciting! Perhaps because of the style of this music, I found the melodies and harmonies quite pedestrian and unsurprising. But some of the other categories more than made up for that. Thanks for your participation and I hope you win the award I created specifically for this piece - the “Rustic Mood” award!

mmmh, warmth, the thing that one can feel, the snug and fuzzy and cozy feeling deep down inside, the senses you feel as you walk through fallen yellow leaves in autumn, maybe at start of a new chapter in one's life. i can definitely say for certain that this piece invokes exactly that. this style is simple and direct. it communicates effectively with the listeners about what it wants to express. unfortunately, as with @ComposaBoi , im not into this style very much. thats why im giving you low scores in originality and taste (sorryyyyy) the themes are presented clearly and the interplay between the instruments are balanced. the middle section kinda wanders a bit but the recognizable theme pulls it back. score is pretty clear, i do agree with @Henry Ng Tsz Kiu with the two repeated notes staccato instead of the tremolos. i guess you can do with the tremolos but instead of one staccato dot, its two. though i do prefer the first option. Melodies Themes Motives 10 Harmony Chords Textures 6 Form Development Structure Time 7 Originality Creativity 5 Score Presentation 9 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 10 Execution of Given Challenge 10 Taste 4 Average Score: 7.75

Hi, Alarik. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 5 3 3 6 1 1 5 5 3.6 Melodies/Themes/Motives: There was something of a melody present in the piece, and I noticed themes that were repeated throughout. However, none of it really kept my interest as there was little deviation. Harmony/Chords/Textures: The piece was stagnant, never drifting from b minor, and the note intervals likewise rarely changed. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The structure of the piece was severely lacking, with themes popping up randomly here and there, and new ideas introduced that (from what I could tell) didn't build upon previous content. Originality/Creativity: I found this submission a little stale, but still somewhat original. Score Presenation: In a word, the score is abysmal; it doesn't have even the barest of minimums. I don't know what instrument is playing what. There are hanging ties. No key signature to speak of. The enharmonics are all wrong. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: This is, unfortunately, totally unplayable. Moreover, the writing isn't idiomatic as evidenced by the fact that even without staff names, I can't tell which instrument is which based solely on the written music. Execution of Given Challenge: Despite the problems with musicality, I did find the piece vaguely reminiscent of a rainy day. Taste: I think you have potential to write good music - given a bit of dedication to music theory and notation. Yes, the music was repetitive and chaotic, but it was not unenjoyable. Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

I can’t believe you quote this piece as this is probably my worst piece ever posted on YC!

Hi, Bryan. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 7 6 7 8 6 7 8 7 7 Melodies/Themes/Motives: Haunting and beautiful, the themes and motives presented here I found to be delightful. The melodic writing, however, was somewhat troublesome as new rhythms were constantly introduced. Harmony/Chords/Textures: This is probably where the submission struggled the most. The piece never strayed from d minor (aeolian/natural), rendering the harmonic progression repetitive and predictable, and leaving my ear wanting for something a little more adventurous. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The development was done satisfactorily, with the eerie opening slowly becoming more driving, and then finally returning at the end of the piece. Originality/Creativity: Excellent choice of two double-reeded instruments paired with the lilting harp. Score Presenation: The score is adequate. It could stand to be "beefed up," with more articulations, hairpins, and cleaner notation (especially in the harp part) added. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: The piece is relatively easy to perform, though the bassoon will find the soft, high passages a bit challenging. The harp part is sparse and repetitive; I think more attention should be given to that instrument. Execution of Given Challenge: I found this beautifully evocative of a lake in the morning. Great job! Taste: This pentatonic-adjacent, lyrical piece was quite enjoyable, even though (or maybe because) it was simple and straightforward. Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, L.P. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 5 2 5 8 6 7 3 3 4.9 Melodies/Themes/Motives: As this submission contained roughly three instruments capable of producing controlled pitches, use of melody was sparse (but not nonexistent); however, melodic writing was underdeveloped. Some themes and motives were noted. Harmony/Chords/Textures: There were very few chords or polyphony throughout, but there was ample texture. Unfortunately, the lack of harmonic progression was a significant detriment to the piece's overall musicality. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The structure was sporadic and a little random, though some patterns were discernible. Originality/Creativity: Regardless of the musicality, this submission was highly original! Score Presenation: The score was acceptable. I noted a few places where hairpins were used but no dynamics supplied, and the score overall was too crowded for my tastes. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: I'm no percussionist, but this seemed playable. Perhaps a little challenging with all of the quick instrument switches. Execution of Given Challenge: I mean, this had a great driving rhythm but it in no way evoked a sense of being lost in the wilderness. Taste: Obviously a personal thing: I'm not much for percussion-heavy works of music. I'm sure the percussionists of the world would thank you for this piece, though! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Luckas. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 7 9 7 5 6 N/A 6 7 6.7 Melodies/Themes/Motives: Satisfactory in my opinion. You maintained a cohesive rhythmic structure throughout the Pavane and into the Galliard. Harmony/Chords/Textures: Truly the shining glory of this submission. You perfectly evoked the Renaissance style and harmonic movement. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The contrasting sections were nicely done and helped to bring balance to the piece. Originality/Creativity: While a beautifully rendered Renaissance-style dance suite, this was, in my opinion, neither original nor creative. Score Presenation: The score met the barest minimum requirements; there were no dynamics markings or tempo indications. If I were to conduct the piece based on the provided score, it would very likely sound nothing like the submitted recording. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: I'm not even the slightest bit familiar with Renaissance-era instruments, hence I don't feel equipped to evaluate this aspect of the submission. Execution of Given Challenge: Unfortunately, this wonderfully crafted Renaissance dance suite did not remind of me of the Lombardy region aside from the historical possibility that pavanes and galliards were performed there at some point. Taste: To be frank, I liked the piece. It was well constructed and cohesive, with enough substance to maintain my curiosity throughout. Good job! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

This is a well-written and playful piano piece! I really liked the modulations — they add harmonic interest to the music. They are so smooth that I didn't even notice the beginning of the recapitulation at the four-minute mark when I listened to it. Very well done! Inspired by Schubert, perhaps? I always admire composers here who write sonatas. Nice autograph, but I had trouble keeping track of the score, maybe because I am not used to seeing tiny notes.😅

this sounds very outgoing. it does sound like going on a hike on a big mountainous region. i imagined those accented chords in the beginning as one seeing the big trees and gets a little overwhelmed by them. loooooove the harmonic color in this, very distinct and pretty. the chaotic contrapuntalness of this reminds me of richard strauss a bit ngl lol the 16th notes flourish on b.5 and scattered throughout is a bit questionable. i have seen those figures before and heard that its awkward to play. the inclusion of flute amongst the string quartet is unique, but i do think is buried against the quartet sometimes with those low register notes clashing against the loud dynamic strings. moreover, as @Henry Ng Tsz Kiu have said, i do think it couldve had the spotlights in more sections. with contrasts, i do notice them! they're not very stark but appropriate for a ~5 mins piece. score is Melodies Themes Motives 8 Harmony Chords Textures 10 Form Development Structure Time 8 Originality Creativity 10 Score Presentation 9 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 8.5 Execution of Given Challenge 10 Taste 9 Average Score: 9.0625 end note: when i accidentally point at the top of a mountain but im just describing this piece

I always feel smarter after I listen to your pieces, like I've learned something, or just feel inspired. What a gift! A prelude with all sorts of "gem" moments, some rather subtle. Measure 4 beats 3 and 4 are smooth as butter (props to Henry, of course). Ms. 14 2nd and 3rd beat are so clever. And it's so weird to hear a contrapuntal-heavy piece sound so ... homey and warmly nostalgic. The vibes are right. Thank you for sharing!

hey this is pretty great! I've never really had concrete composition classes, so I can't give any specific tips but I do play a bit of piano and enjoyed this quite a bit. Keep up the good work and thanks for sharing your creativity!

MelodiesThemes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of GivenChallenge Taste 8.7 7 9 9.5 9.8 9.5 10 5.8 Avg.. 8.66 Everything is well, but this wasn’t really my cup of tea, though I can you should really take the taste category with a grain of salt as again, that is very arbitrary Anyways, you did a really good job exploring the wide range of mood and emotion

thank you so much for your comment!

This is very awesome to hear! Apologies for not conversing in French, as I’m sure it’d be more comfortable for you. It is my opinion that the idea of a musical is no where to be found in the sample you provided. I think it both safer and easier if you work your way up to it instead. If you have not written for solo instruments or chamber/ small ensembles, then trying to take the complexity of a musical, ballet, or opera is not going to benefit you. It’s similar to this metaphor: If a child just learned to write and comes to you to say, “I want to write a research paper!” You might say “that’s a good goal, but you need to do these steps first.” Those who’ve just taken to a skill and are now striving to do the complex works in that genre will give you great challenge. Regardless of the actual notes on the page in this post, consider starting small and writing simpler works. Simpler works that focus on your use of harmony and melody. Something to do that is exercising your skill without having the brain challenge of a large ensemble. Most western musicals will only have 6-15 musicians in local communities and more often than not, it may be one or two brass players switching instruments. So, try writing a brass trio with Bass-Trombone, French Horn and Trumpet. That way you can expand different octaves and still be in territory you know as a brass player.

To answer your question about these techniques Chopping is a percussive technique where you pick up the bow and you near the frog push downward at the string. There should be done with a good amount of pressure, causing a short, percussive chopped sound. The subharmonic is another string technique where you grab a little more pressure than usual on the bow there should be a sweet spot to this. A very good contact point should be a little towards the fingerboard, but the resulting pitch that comes out of this should be an octave below the target note. This is created because that the bow is gripping twice as much times when Bowing, so that heimholtz motion is doubled

thank you so much for your feedback! ill try to implement your suggestions in my next work

Some nice use of extended string techniques here. I've never seen sub-harmonic and chopped directions before. Wonder if you could explain what they mean, and how they're performed?

Hi Sam, The first problem I notice with this, is a technical one. It sounds like you have your master level set too high in the mixer, and it's causing a lot of peak level distortion. There's also quite a lot of octave doubling across the orchestra. This is notorious for causing distortion, because the instrument libraries are artificially adjusted to be perfectly in tune. So you get lots of frequency build up that you wouldn't have in a real orchestra. Some more expensive libraries allow random detuning, which helps circumvent this problem. Octave doubling is something forbidden in strict counterpoint, because it sounds weak. So it's probably best avoided where possible. (I'm being a bit of hypocrite here, because I've made exactly the same mistake in the latest piece I've posted!) Anyway, hope that helps a little. Alex

Hello @PikapikaHei ! Welcome to the forum! To me actually the piano writing is idiomatic! The melodies are also good. For me it would be the structure of the piece. You are going for an ABABA structure which the A and B sections provide good contrast with each other with different mood, tempo and texture. I would suggest you adding more developments in each of the A and B sections after their initial presentation, rather than just changing keys. For example the recurring A sections you could have developed the melodies with variations rhythmically and texturally. Also, it would be great if there is an assimilation of the two sections at the end. However, this is a very good attempt especially from someone who has never attended a composition class, so props to it and keep writing! Henry

rescinded

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 2 4 1 3 5 N/A 0 1 Disqualified, but otherwise average is 2.3 It really doesn't do what it's trying to very effectively. Nothing fugal about it.

I would get to Transcendent rank in a much quicker pace if I posted like you haha.