Hello! I just finished listening and it's a very nice piece to listen to. However, with some things, I feel there are comments needed to be said:
1. You say Violin Concerto, and I must be honest, this is not a Violin Concerto. If you focus on the literal definition, it means solo instrument with orchestra, which you have achieved, but not once did you convince me that the violin is the true feature. It's like an orchestral piece for a movie soundtrack with a nice violin solo to match... akin to Schindler's List by John Williams. Concerto-style implies that you are highlighting the solo instrument, whether it's through virtuosic writing, or a distinct melody with light accompaniment. Instead, you have the solo violin dancing around the accompaniment textures versus a distinct and clear melody.
2. It would be more accurate to title this "[Title] for Solo Violin and Orchestra" versus a concerto.
3. It is very nice sounding. The textures, instrument pairs and gentle writing make this very nice and enjoying to listen to. You are effective in the execution.
4. The "Movements". You noted the start and end of each movement in a non-standard way. It reads as if they are attacca, or played back-to-back with no break.
Overall, I did enjoy the listen. However, when you double-down on definition, I feel it misses points and does not truly match the caliber of the word "Concerto". Good work, and hope to see more!