Leaderboard

Hello all. I had a really hard time figuring out what to do. I had a piece I wrote a while ago about Princess Tuvstarr and Skutt the Elk, where a geological formation called a tarn has an important role, but I decided I need to practice writing things for a deadline, so I needed some new idea. For those that don't know, I am ethnically largely Romanian (though I live in the US), so I settled on some Romanian landscape, and what better than the Carpathian Mountains! In fact, I had a drawing I made a while ago of a Romanian Shepherd (obviously as a furry, if you know me at all) in the mountains playing a Taragot - which sounds like a mix between an English Horn and a Soprano Saxophone. There's an old Romanian tale of a shepherd who lost his sheep, so I wrote this piece following that theme: a shepherd lamenting the loss of his sheep. Please enjoy :) Audio.mp3 Score.pdf

Vote for the winners of the Landscapes - Soundscapes competition! Please note that the themed badges were created for the following pieces: Padovana et Gagliarda “Detta la Lombarda” by @L.S Barros - "Rustic Mood" Award Amidst the Clouds & Flowers by @InstrumentalistElle - "Nature's Garden" Award Morning On Whidbey Island by @BipolarComposer - "Peace of Nature" Award City Rail and Nightingale by @Wieland Handke - "Nature and Civilization" Award Alishan (for Flute Quintet) by @HoYin Cheung - "Forest Echoes" Award “Warmth” by @UncleRed99 - "Home and Hearth" Award Lamentare Ciobanului - “The Shepherd’s Lament” by @ComposaBoi - "Pastorale" Award We have decided not to create more badges because it was inevitable that there would be some overlap/competition in the theme-ing of the badges. For that reason we concede that although the above badges were created for those specific pieces, it is up to the voters at large to determine whether those pieces will actually win those badges. The winners of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd place trophies will be determined by points allotted in the following way: Every 1st place vote in the poll gets 3 points. Every 2nd place vote in the poll gets 2 points. Every 3rd place vote in the poll gets 1 point. 1st place will be given for the entry with the highest number of points. 2nd place will be given for the entry with the 2nd highest etc. .... The poll will close and the competition will be finalized and winners announced on Tuesday, June 9th, 2026. To listen to all the entries go to the submissions thread: And for the competition announcement go here:

I added the following rule to the list: 4) Do not plagiarize other composers works or modify or use elements of another composer's compositions in your own works without permission and giving proper credit to the original composer.

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 8 8 10 8 10 10 9.5 9 Avg: 9 This is such a beautiful piece. Even though it's not your best work (your words), I feel like the simplicity of this style is what makes it so powerful. Yes, it may be simple, but I feel like the technique is not so simple. And the emotions you were able to invoke were very real. Honestly, isn't that the point of music? The harmony also has extreme focus and purpose. I love towards the end when you just flip the key completely; such a powerful key change moment. The ending is also very nice, with the imperfect cadence. The balance of your instruments are done very well, and not overwhelming at all. This is important, you clearly know how to use the instruments to the song's advantage. Your techniques are fun, the cello knows just the right moment to chime in, the violins have a purpose and the piano does its role in supporting the harmony.

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 10 10 10 10 10 7 8 10 Disqualified due to being too long, but otherwise Average is 9.4 Congratulations! You got the highest score from me. I scored everyone else quite low. My only issue was the horn was sometimes a little high, and although each instrument is generally well written for, the ensemble would be a little imbalanced if performed live I think. But besides that, it was great. It's a shame it's too long! Thanks for sharing, it was a very enjoyable listen!

its kinda rare for me to wake up and immediately try to respond to a comment first thing in the morning, but here we are i disagree. i'd argue the empty spaces are there to let the music breathe, and i have considered of keeping the "movement" going in one way or the other, either by the piano playing scales, rapid lines, the syncopated triplets, arpeggiando on the strings, timpani rhythms, etc. also, i dont think every empty space has to be filled with motivic movement. does every piece has to have a melody "naked"? and i pretty sure have varied the harmony and texture. the first introduction to the full theme its literally just pizz. string and high register piano playing 6th broken up (which adds movement, by the way), the repeat of which (b.194) just removes the piano entirely, the first entrance of the second theme is played by cello only, with piano and pizz violin to accentuate the syncopated rhythm, the measures before that is another thinning of textures after a loud section, etc etc. i mean, i like it, so...oh well lol yeah, the themes are long and therefore had to be repeated. however, if i cut those repetitions the themes wouldnt be prominent. hell i did in fact cut the first theme in the repetition. most of the systems include 2-4 bars, with the exception of a few bars where there are few notes to play. i do not think crowding is an issue here. response: added references: and probably more. i couldnt find anything outside facebook discussions to be honest. HOWEVER, most of the chamber pieces including a piano that i've score read have the non-piano instruments be in smaller staves. response: also note, i'd rather have a seemingly impossible part and have to revise them after some feedbacks than not using the instruments to its fullest potential. part of why i fell in love with classical music is that you can get SO MUCH out of one singular instrument. the fact that composers have exploited many ways out of an instrument to serve their vision is so fascinating to me. maybe its innocent for me to think that way. of course, you have to consider the performer and the rehearsal, but, im gonna be real, i dont think this piece is ever gonna be performed. AND, if it was, or if i were to compose a piece that WILL be performed, then yes, i'll absolutely not go overboard and stuff, strip down the techniques, and be more lenient with them. this DOES NOT mean i do not think of idiomatic writing (refer to the my quoted response). also 6 bars of left hand open strings pizzicato played near the edge of the fingerboard is impossible? but, as all art are, it comes down to taste. so, fair enough thanks for the comments!!!

Hi, Jonathon. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 7 6 7 7 7 8 9 7 7.3 Melodies/Themes/Motives: I noted a couple of melodies/themes in this piece that recurred in varying voices and keys - and you even altered the note lengths to improve the variability. I can tell you've improved a lot in this area since a few years ago (when I was last active on the site)! There were some issues with voice leading, though, where the melody became overshadowed by supporting voices. Harmony/Chords/Textures: You had some good ideas here and I could tell what you were trying to do, but I think that, unfortunately, it fell flat in some places. I liked that the piece didn't stay in one key but instead wandered around into others. I especially loved the polychords (for example, in m. 67) that resolved to the tonic. However, the harmonic motion otherwise felt a bit stale, with too much parallel movement, and many of the tonal centers shifted without effective cadences. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece was well-structured and had good development. The emergence of the various themes was handled well, I thought, and they changed voices and timbres throughout. I did feel that the piece suffered a little from poor pacing, where the repeated themes left me wishing for something different. Originality/Creativity: I felt this was sufficiently original, though musically it was relatively tame. Score Presentation: The score was adequate. I felt like it needed a little more spacing in places, but the articulations and directions were nice and succinct. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: This piece is very playable. I do question the choice of English horn (other than for its pastoral vibe, I suppose), since you wrote in the range of the oboe, but, aside from that, everything seems to be written idiomatically. Execution of Given Challenge: The piece did an excellent job capturing the quotidian joys (and worries) of being a Carpathian shepherd. Great work! Taste: Sure, the piece wasn't the best it could have been, but I nevertheless found it quite enjoyable. I'm impressed at how much you've matured as a composer in the past couple of years! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Kyle. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 9 7 9 7 8 9 9 9 8.4 Melodies/Themes/Motives: Your sense of melody and themes is exquisite! I found this to be simple and unobtrusive in all the best ways. I especially enjoyed how you used the mere addition of instruments to build on the sound, gradually and to great effect, as your themes wove around each other. Simply beautiful. Harmony/Chords/Textures: Similarly, the harmony was simple but effective. There was enough counterpoint and differing harmonic motion to keep it interesting - and to tell the "story" you were trying to convey. The single issue I took was at m. 57 when we enter what appeared to be an authentic cadence (an A) only to be jerked into a C major, which did not hit my ears the right way (no matter how many times I listened to it). Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece had a wonderful flow to it, easily ebbing into sweeping thematic passages where the melody/theme was passed from instrument to instrument. The themes were repeated throughout, but with enough variation that it was (to me) the perfect blend of recognizable and unrecognizable. And the pacing... spot on! Originality/Creativity: This wasn't the most original thing I've ever heard, but it was adequately different that I could likely distinguish it from other ambient soundtracks. Score Presentation: The score was above average, I'd say. I think there was overuse of some articulations - particularly the marcato - when the instrument's natural sound would likely suffice. I also felt the score was too crowded in many places. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: There were no issues with playability noted. The writing seemed mostly idiomatic, with some attention given to each instrument. Execution of Given Challenge: This was very programmatic music and the identified landscape was, to me, easily felt in the music. Taste: The music was well-constructed and flowed beautifully. It was, perhaps, too homophonic for my usual tastes, but it was good music, nonetheless. Very nice job! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, HoYin. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 5 6 6 7 9 6 5 5 6.2 Melodies/Themes/Motives: While there were themes and motives present throughout, the melodic writing was unconvincing and never supported by harmonic structure beneath. This made the piece seem to lack musical direction, instead sounding like a mixture of competing and unrelated themes. Harmony/Chords/Textures: There was no effective use of cadential structure that I could find, causing the piece to swing randomly from one key to the next. Harmonic motion was varied and there was counterpoint throughout, which helped give the piece some substance. The textures, I felt, were too random, with the strings and flute dropping and changing registers frequently and with abandon. Form/Development/Structure/Time: Aside from verbatim repeated themes, sometimes in different keys, the piece didn't really have any development. It seemed to be in a hurry to get somewhere from start to finish, but nothing seemed to serve a purpose. There was nothing predictable or patterned in the music, it just sort of... happened. Originality/Creativity: You've been around on this forum long enough for me to recognize your style, and this piece was no different. However, nothing in this submission stood out to me as new or exciting (it sounded a lot like other pieces of yours I've heard). Score Presentation: Very nicely done, nearly professional quality. I noted some hairpins and crescendos that lacked dynamics, as well as an overabundance of articulations, but those were mostly negligible issues. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: There are too many stops in the string parts, and while they're likely playable, many of them will require rolling or arpeggiation to execute, which disrupts the flow of the quick tempo. You also have passages that swap very quickly from pizz. to arco, even some in the middle of stops (like m. 143 in the 2nd violin). These may not be impossible to perform, but they increase the difficulty of the piece (and, in my opinion, not justifiably so). Execution of Given Challenge: This didn't feel like anything in particular to me. Taste: As far as soundscapes go, this is a compelling piece. I, however, prefer more structure and stronger melodic involvement and development. Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Wieland. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 8 7 7 9 9 6 8 6 7.5 Melodies/Themes/Motives: The melodies were purely mimetic (i.e., attempting to portray the actual sounds in music rather than an emotional interpretation or representation) and therefore did not lend themselves to good melodic writing. Nevertheless, your use of themes and motives was very strong throughout, as meticulously noted in your score. Harmony/Chords/Textures: On the one hand, you employed a couple of devices - tremolos and trills - to depict the train's acceleration and birdcalls, which was innovative. This texture, though, began to feel overused after a couple minutes into the piece. Because this piece was more onomatopoeia than programmatic music, the harmonies you used felt arbitrary. Moreover, the use of actual chords in this piece was more limited than what I thought at first listen; a great number of lines was doubled by another instrument, either in unison or at some octave above or below. All in all, I felt that the five instruments you used were "under tuned" for a piece of this caliber. Form/Development/Structure/Time: There was good structure to this piece, though, again, because the piece was onomatopoeic, it didn't truly develop as much as it simply progressed from theme to theme. The break in tempo roughly midway through was appreciated, but the piece ironically lacked any sense of motion (to me, at least); the glue holding this together were the descriptive texts in the score that very unsubtly described what each motif was meant to portray. Without the score, the piece becomes a soundscape of seemingly disjointed musical themes abruptly changing from one to the next. However... from an objective standpoint, that you are able to conceive of these things in your mind and then organize them into musical sections is quite extraordinary. Originality/Creativity: I've not heard anything similar to this, and even if I don't agree with your choice of chords and harmonies, this is a voice that is your own, and for that, you get the highest marks. Score Presentation: Meticulous and thorough. Very close to professional quality, though a little crowded and over-articulated at various places for my taste. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: In my opinion, this is the piece's weakest aspect, though I do not wish to be harsh here. I strongly question the decision to use two pianos, when for the vast majority of the piece, they either A) do not play simultaneously, or B) when playing simultaneously, they do not use all four hands. Furthermore, the string parts frequently double either each other or one of the piano parts. Taken altogether, this suggests that the piece could be more succinctly written for a smaller ensemble, such as a piano trio (violin, cello, and piano). The 13/16 time signature present for most of the piece is already difficult to count out and, when coupled with the onomatopoeic nature of the themes, makes me wonder if perhaps an ametric approach would be more appropriate. Lastly, but maybe most importantly, the string parts do not add much to the piece, which is carried entirely by the movement in one (or both, at times) of the piano parts. It might have helped to give the strings some passages without the piano also playing. Execution of Given Challenge: Again, I have to award high marks here simply because of how well you put this together. There's no question as to what your music depicts! Taste: I lean strongly into the impressionist camp and, I suppose by definition, do not take much interest in mimetic music. I would normally give music like this a much lower score, but your command of tone and texture makes this considerably more enjoyable. Nice work! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Musicbro456. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 6 7 7 7 3 3 8 6 5.9 Melodies/Themes/Motives: Great use of themes and melody in this submission! There were, unfortunately, quite a few issues with voice leading in which the solo viola would be completely drowned out or washed out amid the surrounding chordal textures, but your themes were solid... if a bit repetitive. Harmony/Chords/Textures: There was not a lot of harmonic movement: the piece remained mostly in G minor with some C minor chords sprinkled throughout, which sapped it of most of its harmonic strength. I noted excursions to D minor and A minor, as well... perhaps a journey along the circle of fifths? I felt your use of dynamics was compelling; emotional swells followed by quiet, captivating moments. This was good work! Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece had great "bones." You effectively worked in several motifs that reappeared when expected, and the whole thing worked to a climax at rehearsal mark IV, followed by a denouement and resolution. The music really told a story. Originality/Creativity: The fact that you chose viola as the solo instrument gives you several more points in this category (I am a violist). Jokes aside, the instrumentation and musicality was, I felt, sufficiently original. I can tell you're trying to develop your own voice. Score Presentation: The score was chaotic and, at times, nonsensical. For example, it starts out with dynamics markings "mf expression," which perhaps was intended to mean espressivo. There were modulations to key signatures that were unnecessary. The note stems were randomly in different voices rather than all the same voice. The score was also very crowded in places, with directions from one staff bleeding over into the one above or below it. For some reason, solo viola was written in the treble clef, even though the viola section was in the alto clef and had higher notes written for their part. It's conventional to split the violins into two sections - violin I and violin II - but here they remained undivided. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: There were multiple serious problems noted here. The solo viola would undoubtedly become overwhelmed by the divisi strings accompanying it in well over half the passages of this piece. Furthermore, the viola section was more technically challenging than the solo viola part, which is unconventional (but not illegal). There were also multiple passages intended to be played at an octave or double octave above what was written, some of which is technically impossible, especially at the dynamics supplied. It would probably help you in the future if you dedicated some time to learning how to write for strings. Execution of Given Challenge: This was solid, programmatic music, in my opinion, and sufficiently reminiscent of the blazing glory - and eventual hushed quiet - of a sunset. Taste: I liked what you were going for! I think your writing could be helped dramatically with more attention to music theory and (in this case) string part writing. Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

Hi, Chenfeng. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 4 5 4 6 5 N/A 0 4 4.0 Melodies/Themes/Motives: No real sense of melody was present, and themes/motives were simply repeated with little to no variation. Harmony/Chords/Textures: The piece remained in A major; in fact, it was largely just one A major chord. There was a brief transition to E major but without an effective cadence, this felt contrived and a bit jarring. Harmonic movement featured an overuse of parallel motion and therefore felt stagnant. Form/Development/Structure/Time: Despite the title, this was not a fugue; there was no subject or species. There was little development noted and owing to an utter lack of cadences or breaths, the music felt monotonous to me. Originality/Creativity: This submission was, perhaps, different than most other entries; however, I didn't feel it did anything to distinguish itself from existing traditional Chinese music nor did it adequately take on the composer's voice. Score Presenation: The score was readable, but no dynamics and very few articulations were supplied. Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: I do not feel qualified to evaluate this criterion, as I know next to nothing about traditional Chinese instruments or how they're played. Execution of Given Challenge: Unfortunately, the submission did not meet the competition's time length criterion. But length notwithstanding, I did not feel this piece evoked the image supplied (aside from the fact than both artists performed in traditional Chinese media). Taste: I love fugues, but this piece was merely pentatonic writing that had very little color. It sadly did not pique my interest. However, I think with more dedication to voice leading and harmonic movement, you'll drastically improve your writing style! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

just incase i need to review my own piece for that heavyweight badge Melodies Themes Motives 0 Harmony Chords Textures 0 Form Development Structure Time 0 Originality Creativity 0 Score Presentation 0 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 0 Execution of Given Challenge 0 Taste 0 Average Score: 0 this sucks never compose again

i'd say this piece does a good job at portraying a somber afternoon. the simple viola melody guides the piece straightforwardly while the accompaniment of the orchestra stills. the score is a bit confusing to read, i feel: random ottava lines, inverted beams of the notes.i also question the playability of some of the violins passages but overall, its not bad!! some of the contrasts work well and they're effective! good jobb Melodies Themes Motives 8 Harmony Chords Textures 3 Form Development Structure Time 5 Originality Creativity 3 Score Presentation 5 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 4 Execution of Given Challenge 5 Taste 3 Average Score: 4.5

this piece has that anger, yknow? thatof one losing a sheep and getting angry and sad, a cycle of grief. speaking of, it kinda represents the stages of grief, with the acceptance at the end. i imagine the contrast in this piece is like this shepherd, high in the mountain and he's mad to himself, alone, with nothing but his taragot. the different sections are distinguishable and the pacing is enjoyable. the contrasts between the sections are prominent and surprised me a bit sometimes lol. the theme and instrumentation certainly helps with this. its distinctive and full of characteristics. those low C string cello notes are powerfullll, same with the english horn and the high E string violin (again, effective contrast). absolutely using the instruments at their advantage me love chromaticsm porridge. the use of dissonance is very effective!!! the piece has a wide array of the dissonance range (soft to hard dissonances) and its usage is appropriate. i highkey like this piece Melodies Themes Motives 10 Harmony Chords Textures 10 Form Development Structure Time 10 Originality Creativity 8 Score Presentation 10 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 10 Execution of Given Challenge 10 Taste 8 Average Score: 9.5

Hello @ferrum.wav , thank you for your kindly review of my piece. I’m pleased that you could follow the imagination and story I wanted to depict musically! Since there was still plenty of space on the score, I decided to follow the example of @Henry Ng Tsz Kiu 's “Joking Fugue on Jingle Bell …", which also includes such humorous comments ... Yes, that’s right. Even though this is a new composition for the competition, I just started to compose the piece for piano solo (to include it in my collection of preludes and fugues) and then „enriched“ the piece with the further instrumentation by the strings. Therefore, the main texture is performed by the piano(s) alone and the strings serve to create more „color“ or „soundscapes“. However, there is a theme or motif in the “Nightingale” B section, played by the strings (measures 35–37 by the cello and measures 44–47 by the violin), that does not appear in the prelude for solo piano.

Hi, Elle. Please see my evaluation of your submission below. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste Overall 5 7 5 8 10 6 4 5 6.25 Melodies/Themes/Motives: The melodic writing was almost nonexistent, instead replaced with chordal columns that seemed to go nowhere. There was motivic or thematic development; however, in my opinion, not enough was done to clearly distinguish such themes, and the result was rather muddied and obfuscated. Harmony/Chords/Textures: Not much triadic/diatonic harmony (which is fine by me), and the tonal palette employed was used quite effectively. In my opinion, the harmonic structure could have been improved if the harmonic progressions were more consistent rather than seemingly random. Form/Development/Structure/Time: The piece was beautifully textured but the long, sustained notes (often in harmonics and/or stops) were frequently syncopated and combined into rapidly altering time signatures. The structural ambiguity is not helped by the lack of discernible musical patterns (I can tell there are patterns from looking at the score, but not by listening or playing). Originality/Creativity: I found this to be exotic and refreshing, and very much unlike other submissions. Score Presenation: The score was flawless. Excellent job! Instrumentation/Orchestration/Playability: The piece was chock full of stops and harmonics, had nebulous time signatures, maintained no clear rhythm, and possessed copious amounts of syncopation. The detailed score helps a great deal with interpretation, but the piece still emerged as agonizingly difficult to perform. Execution of Given Challenge: While beautiful and evocative, this piece brings to mind etherealness and aimless wandering - not the grandeur of the Zhangjiajie mountains (nor the flora sprinkled at their peaks). Taste: I enjoy non-diatonic harmonies, which your submission employed. However, I felt that the musical effects were too "on-the-nose"; i.e., you overused harmonics to evoke a sense of floating in the clouds and the "going-nowhere" harmonies made the piece a bit too stagnant - at least for my tastes. Still, your submission was very impressive and I think you're someone the music world should keep their eye on! Thanks for submitting, and happy composing! Jordan

i definitely can paint a landscape with this piece!! from the mechanical movements of the historical train to a stroll along a garden complex, it encapsulates the journey effectively. i like the depiction of the moving train itself using the tremolos and the wandering upward melody line. that upward melody line here signifies a "progress" i think? the B section is about taking a stroll through a garden complex and i notice it being used there but slowed down. the contrast between machines and nature is very clear: the mechanical dissonant of the old train and railway machinery is contrasted against the light wandering melody of the B section. the nightingale depiction with the trills is also neat. i wish the strings got a more prominent presence here!! theyre mainly used as a doubling with a piano and overshadowed by the two pianos imo. those low thirds on the cello (b8) might be difficult. its fun to read the score because how the programme is woven into it. i like reading what one passage is supposed to represent. and lastly, the story is just so simple yet warm. you take an old historical train in the evening to a garden and notice some nightingales, d'awwwww how cozy and nice i love itttt Melodies Themes Motives 8 Harmony Chords Textures 8 Form Development Structure Time 10 Originality Creativity 9 Score Presentation 8 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 10 Execution of Given Challenge 10 Taste 8 Average Score: 8.9 end note: how i feel when describing the story

I think you have a lot of natural talent and creativity. Attending a class for something is nice, and can be really helpful, but there's really no substitute for just doing something and seeing and hearing for yourself what works, and what doesn't. Listening to and analyzing what other composers have done is an incredible education in and of itself. It's impressive that you wrote this in such a playable and natural way! I hope you hold on to this colorful whimsy, too. Thanks for sharing! This was a lot of fun to listen to.

Just a little update on reviewers and their reviews: @TristanTheTristan you've done 6 reviews - you need 2 more to get the Welterweight Reviewer badge, otherwise you will be a Featherweight Reviewer @ferrum.wav you've also done 6 and need 2 more for Welterweight @HoYin Cheung you've done 5 and need 3 more for Welterweight @Fruit hunter you've done 7 and need 1 more for Welterweight @UncleRed99 you've done 4 and qualify for Featherweight Reviewer

Title MelodiesThemes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste AVG The Voyage of a Lone Ship 9 9 7.8 9.8 9.5 7.8 4.5 9.6 8.37 Overall, you did a really good job with the piece the one gripe I only have though is just some of the double stops in quadruple stops could be impossible. You did a really good job of storytelling. The reason why i tanked your execution score Just like all the other responses, this exceeds the eight minute maximum however though I must give where credit credit is due as I think that the nine minutes was all enjoyable and wasn’t a huge problem musically This is a good story, but it doesn’t correspond to a specific landscape strongly but anyways good work

i like the usage of chinese instruments here. definitely unique and original. i will choose to not grade the playability since i do not know the intricacies. the score is definitely readable, but it lacks a lot of things (dynamics, articulation, etc.). the resulting look is very bare. i could not hear any memorable/distinct themes/subjects as they are not presented well. sure, there are contrapuntal lines, but they are just that, lines. without noticeable melodies to cling onto, the lines fall flat imo. one can probably notice upon further score inspection (or multiple listens), but i do have to consider the first couple of listening experience as well. furthermore, i couldnt associate the piece with the given pictures, other than it sounds chinese. the piece leans heavily into pentatonic, but there is also no clear harmonic direction. it feels aimless. good contrapuntal writing though! Melodies Themes Motives 2 Harmony Chords Textures 2 Form Development Structure Time 3 Originality Creativity 7 Score Presentation 4 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability N/A Execution of Given Challenge 3 Taste 2 Average Score: π (3.14, not the exact value of the pi decimal preceding it, but still lol)

im really fond of how experimental this is. the variety is wilddd and the inclusion of handmade instruments?? very creative. i quite like how blended the different percussion timbres are and they definitely provide unique textures. it's fun listening to the rambunctiousness of the different percussions as they come and go. unfortunately, as @UncleRed99 has pointed out in the rules, there should've been only 3-5 monophonic or polyphonic instruments present. HOWEVER, i am not even going to try to discourage you cus this piece is funnn to listen to. i notice that the themes have distinct characters. they clearly portray a set of vibes and imagery. i can imagine a landscape according to the story. the score couldve been presented better. its very small and reminds me of my score entry for the "bits and bangers" yc competition years ago lol although the middle section feels directionless, the return of the beginning theme and texture ties it up!! its also appropriate for the context of the piece. the story that youve provided is very whimsical and i thoroughly enjoyed reading it!!! its honestly nostalgic for me cus i used to play and wander with my childhood friends too when i was a child. not to the extent of forests and a colonial place per se, but it was definitely an adventure. goood job!!! Melodies Themes Motives 6 Harmony Chords Textures 8 Form Development Structure Time 7 Originality Creativity 10 Score Presentation 3 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 10 Execution of Given Challenge 5 Taste 7 Average Score: 7 (how rounded) end note: handmade instruments

Title Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste AVG The Voyage of a Lone Ship 9 9.5 9 9.7 8.5 9 9.5 9.5 9.21 Hi @ferrum.wav! This is a very creative piece. The harmonic development and texture is really rich here. Really appreciate your exploration of different playing techniques to create different textures. Good work! The motives is passed on throughout the piece and makes the piece coherent. I particularly like the part between 4:33 and 6:33 and I truely believe I am on a cruise! And it is like a parade. The build up and resolution around 8:30 is also very satisfying. Looking forward to a film that can fit your music! 🤣

Title Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste AVG Lamentare Ciobanului - "The Shepherd's Lament" 9 8.5 9 8.5 8.5 9 9 9 8.81 Hello @ComposaBoi. I really like your work. I would say among the entries of this Soundscape competition, I find your piece the most "storytelling"! And that is acheived through minimal orchestration. I admire your gift in this aspect and I really wish I could write melody as you did. By the way, your choice of English Horn is quite tasty as it is mellow and antique and blend well with the sustained strings. Like other said, this work has distinctive sections like "chapters" of a novel. While they have different textures, the overflow is quite natural and the build-up is nice.

Hello @PikapikaHei ! Welcome to the forum! To me actually the piano writing is idiomatic! The melodies are also good. For me it would be the structure of the piece. You are going for an ABABA structure which the A and B sections provide good contrast with each other with different mood, tempo and texture. I would suggest you adding more developments in each of the A and B sections after their initial presentation, rather than just changing keys. For example the recurring A sections you could have developed the melodies with variations rhythmically and texturally. Also, it would be great if there is an assimilation of the two sections at the end. However, this is a very good attempt especially from someone who has never attended a composition class, so props to it and keep writing! Henry

Hey Jonathon @ComposaBoi ! I like the part writing here and the Cor anglais is definitely better than oboe for presenting the Romanian mood, I think. The melodies are really memorable to me as well. I would say in terms of structure you could have introduced more contrast between in the middle sections, rather than just modulating and changing the modality to major. To me there's an imbalance of structure as you put the contrast solely at the end, which somewhat sounds less move forward. I would also say the tragic ending in b.81 is a bit abrupt to me. I like the passage itself but the preparation to it is not enough for me with only an accelerating bassline and suddenly modulates from a different key. I am nitpicky here probably because I listen to @ferrum.wav 's piece before yours, so sorry for that! I like your piece though even if my words are nitpicky! Thx for sharing! Henry No less you are a German. Very precise value 😗.

im not that well versed in renaissance writing style (and instruments), but it does certainly sound like it. however, i do find it difficult to associate with the given landscape. i also think its hard to do originality since you chose a distinct style and has to follow the rules in order to sound like said style. nevertheless, i quite like the harmony and melody. they sound playful, especially on the 3/2 section. Melodies Themes Motives 7 Harmony Chords Textures 8 Form Development Structure Time 10 Originality Creativity 6 Score Presentation 9 Instrumentation Orchestration Playability 9 Execution of Given Challenge 6 Taste 6 Average Score: 7.62 end note: renaissance good

After reviewing eight of eleven contributions to the contest, there are now three ones remaining which challenge me the most. That are the ones of @InstrumentalistElle , @BipolarComposer and @HoYin Cheung . The reason for this is that they have so much in common, both in terms of their qualities and their style and mood. Since my comments would hardly differ, I have decided to copy and paste passages verbatim, which I will therefore highlight in blue, while my individual thoughts are written in the standard color as usual. With your submission(s), you have presented compositions that best meet the expectations one might have given the “Landscapes-Soundscapes” challenge: Pieces that depict a landscape as a “still life”, utilizing every conceivable timbre of the instrumentation, blending, etc., to create true “program music”. When listening, one can easily imagine a scenery from the nature: clouds, trees, a quiet lake or sea, a sunset etc. All this has been executed very well. On the other hand, the piece(s) are sometimes hard to memorize because there is few or even no thematic material in the sense of a recurring melody that is developed throughout the piece, giving it its own unique and memorable character. In fact, to be honest, as I listened to them in a loop —which is exactly what I did during a walk to familiarize myself with all the submissions—I sometimes thought the next section was coming up in the first piece, when indeed the next one had already begun. So I could imagine that this kind of music would work well as “ambient music”, for example, a CD someone might listen to at night if they have trouble falling asleep. Melodies Themes Motives: The motivic or thematic material of the piece(s) is used primarily to create a „soundscape“ depicting the certain scenes or images, such as the clouds, trees, mountains etc. The development of the motifs does not create any melodies but ongoing sound structures which themselves produce an interesting progression. Harmony Chords Textures: The texture is amazing. Together with the dissonances, the piece – while being slow in pulse – creates scenes with constantly growing tension or, vice versa, release, thus having a very cinematic character. Form Development Structure Time: The composition is not in a specific traditional form, the different sections or passages could be considered as „episodes“ or different „pictures“ of the entire imagery, which is fine for a piece intended to portrait a certain scenary from the nature. Originality Creativity: The creativity and originality clearly arises from the way how the different motifs create „sound snippets“ which finally draw the „soundscape“. Even if there is no „melody“ – which usually makes it more difficult to memorize a piece – the entire impression based on its mysterious mood and timbre makes it unique. Score Presentation: The score is easy to read with no engraving issues. Instrumentation Orchestration Playability: You’ve mastered to evoke an astonishing colorfulness from the string quartet, particularly by applying natural and artificial harmonics and flageolets, whereas that might be challenging to perform. Execution of Given Challenge: You have clearly mastered the challenge of the contest with excellence, creating an inner imagery for the listener with your „soundscape“ that depicts the „landscape“ as described by the posted picture. And the term “soundscape” perfectly captures the nature of the piece. Taste: It's very nice for relaxing, though I prefer music that focuses more on thematic material and form (perhaps that's why I'm more of a fan of the Baroque or Classical periods than the Romantic one). Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 8 10 8 8 9 10 10 7 Average Score: 8.75

alrightttttt time to respond to some of the comments @Kvothe @Wieland Handke @ComposaBoi @chopin @Luis Hernández i am very aware of the rule violation and i honestly dont care to be honest lol. ive already made peace with it. also, ive gone with the mindset of atleast i've finished a piece and not leave it unfinished like my other pieces. working on this piece was hard enough that im really proud to have enough determination to actually complete it. this is what i thought and heard as well during my researching process. i was listening to dohnanyi's sextet, which included horn, and horn could definitely project powerfully. furthermore, when executing loud dynamics, the virtual instrument that i've used aren't very capable to project strongly. i do acknowledge that. my method was to give the horn rests before and after the high register sections and make sure to only do loud dynamics. but mayyybe i might still have gone overboard with it lmao i'd love to hear more specifics about this tbh ive researched this many times and my conclusion is that it is the standard? maybe ive looked at the wrong discussions but the majority said that for chamber music, the staves besides the piano may be smaller to conserve space, which it did. but they also said that this applies to formatting for the piano part. soo i guess you could say that my score is the piano part. idk glad you hear those things that ive tried to portray! it was definitely the vision that i was trying to achieve and im satisfied you got those impressions. yesssss you noticed the whole tone scale scattered throughout! it was definitely cus of just, "water," but yes it definitely added a tone of mystery too. yes! there were fair few selections of artworks that i had to choose from, here are the two of them there shouldve been two or three more drawings but i didnt download it in time before it got wiped with the middle section, i had wanted a clear contrast between the dreary beginning and ending. so i sketched up a rhythmically active theme. as it evolved (with instrumentation and other embellishments), it turned into somewhat of a "pop-y" sound - catchy, syncopated and all - and i liked how it sounded. it definitely does sound like an adventure! form: b1-b38 = intro (contains fragments of Theme 1 (T1), specifically the first three 4 notes), i imagined this to be like the entrance appearance of the ship, the sound of a creaking old wooden ship b39-b84 = full intro and repetition of T1 (the dreary and mysterious theme) b85-b101 = a whole tone scale "storm," Theme 1 is pitted against Theme 2 motif b103-b155 = full intro and 2 repetitions of T2 (the bright and catchy theme) b156-b193 = a fugue section of T2 and T1 meant as a transition b194-b232 = T1, cut and altered b233-256 = coda, contains the final climax. the "misterioso" part meant to be a call back to the intro (b249 right hand piano arpeggio figure, b250 piano left hand the "atonal" figure) with T2 motif on the horn. definitely due to the massive piano chord arpeggios and the syncopated triplets lmao i think one of my principle of writing for instruments is to squeeze and extract as much as possible out of them. i could definitely see some issues with this but in my mind, i always think of playability, even in the brink of it lol. with the stops, most of them are 6ths, 8ths, open strings, the triple stops are in 6ths with the exception of including open strings, the quadruple stops always have open strings to them, and im aware of the difficulty of executing these in faster speed, the challenging registers (high for violin, low for cello), and the possible positions with each strings. the col legno are performed at open strings as well. i am honored lol i am GLAD and SATISFIED that everyone liked the presentation of the score. i worked soooo hard on it and it is definitely satisfying to see everyone like it thank you so much for everyone that has commented so far! i will definitely try to comment the other pieces. i meant to start early with that (and i did, with 1 piece lmao) but i always struggle to put my thoughts into words as they are very scattered in my mind.

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 9.5 7.5 9 10 9 10 9 8 Avg: 9 What I like about this piece, is the diversity of emotions and techniques. And in my opinion, your ending is the strongest part of the piece. But there are many good techniques you use here, so let's go through some of them that I've observed. First is your ability to create anticipation by using certain themes with instruments. You don't rush through your music which is something I admit I even have a hard time with. For example, you understand the usage of rests to help build tension and clarity. This is really important in all types of writing, not just music. The body of your piece has a clear theme / melody, but leading to that melody is what is even more impressive to me. You have a non standard first 1/3, but clearly lead to a more structured body. And as a result, this makes your music creative, but also very easy to follow. And now to the strongest part which is your ending. You flip the harmony and mood completely here. What makes this section so memorable, is the fact that most of the piece is pretty tame. So your ending becomes so unexpected, but it also gives the listener quite the shock. Very well done.

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 9 9 8.5 10 10 8.5 9 8.5 Avg: 9.1 The intro is awesome! I love how you start this out, as chaotic, but structured chaos. I observed some instances of the whole tone scale towards the beginning, which I feel adds to the mystery of the voyage. It's clear from the music that you intended this to be a chaotic voyage, with the instances of adventure and reprieve. Fun motive towards the first third / or middle section of the piece. Very swing-like here, and I definitely get a sense of exploration and adventure around this section. Then you change it up the last 3rd (beautiful usage of a rest, creating anticipation, or a scene change), followed up with instances of mystery, calm and some chaos. For some reason I get a bit of a Rachmaninoff vibe here. Very jazzy ending, and yes as I listen to the ending right now, I definitely hear a tiny bit of Rach influence...this is pretty awesome! There was a lot of musical content here, definitely one of the more complex pieces in this competition. Either way, complex or not, this is an extremely creative piece. Your intro was killer, your middle section introduced the fun swing-like motive, the last third was enjoyable and quite melodramatic. Awesome use of the whole tone scale; you didn't overdo it, but used it just enough to add some fun mystery to this voyage. Well done!

Melodies Themes Motives: The piece is full of motifs that reflect the various impressions experienced during voyage of the ship. Most of them not in the manner of a melody but rather to create the respective impression: the waves, the storm, and the loneliness of a quiet night. However, there are also some melodic lines that turn the whole thing into “music” and not not only an agglomeration of imitated “sounds.” Well done! Harmony Chords Textures: The harmonic style is—though surprising at first—very varied: dramatic, atonal passages shift directly to more tonal, calm ones and are then interspersed with jazzy sections—which I really liked. One can literally imagine the different situations of the ship’s voyage: storm and heavy waves – and then again the calm, open sea or a lonely starry night. Form Development Structure Time: The composition does not follow any specific traditional form, which is perfectly acceptable for a piece intended to depict certain images, tell a story, or even serve as film music. Unfortunately, the playing time of more than 9 minutes exceeds the limits requested by the contest’s prerequisites. Originality Creativity: There is a lot of creativity! First, your attempt to get the inspiration from a prompt given random people with the task to draw the picture. How many attempts did you need? Or did you go with the first one? Since the result was unpredictable, you had to take up a scenario you perhaps did not think on and translate it to the music! And there is also lot creativity in the music itself. The instrumentation and the contrast between the more dramatic and the playful, jazz-like sections! Score Presentation: The score, while being dense due to the many “virtuoso” passages that need to be engraved, is clear and readable. Perhaps you have decided for the smaller font on the other instruments than the piano to achieve that more staves would fit on a single page. Instrumentation Orchestration Playability: The instrumentation is very interesting: With the piano as the foundation and providing the more rhythmic and percussive base, the strings consisting of a cello and violin—thus offering a large ambitus—and the horn and timpani serving as festive and signaling elements, you have a variety of sounds at your disposal to create a piece with different colors. As for playability, I think it would be at least “challenging” and would require a certain degree of virtuosity if performed by human musicians. Execution of Given Challenge: You have clearly mastered the challenge of the contest with excellence! But – and that hurts me to say – not met the rules of the competition. As you stated yourself that you „might’ve gone overboard with the duration“, you are aware of that rule violation. And I can truly understand that, when being in a „flow“ composing, it is sometimes hard to come to the end if there are a number of ideas which have to been expressed. Concerning the huge amount of effort you must have spent to achieve that final result, you’re tempting me to break the rules as well by giving you a score that takes all (other) criteria into account and doesn’t skip your piece due to disqualification. Taste: Even if that genre (let me call it „soundtrack“ or „movie score“) is not my favorite one, I really like it due to it creative ideas and colorfulness. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 10 10 5 10 8.5 9.5 10 9 Average Score: 9.0

First of all, congratulations on meeting the submission deadline. This competition was a real challenge, and despite the two-month timeframe, only half of the participants who originally planned to submit a composition actually finished their work! Melodies Themes Motives and Harmony Chords Textures: There is a distinctive motif introduced by the English horn in measures 3–4 that runs through the entire piece in various variations. Other motifs serve to create a kind of counterpoint in the “rich” sections of the string accompaniment, while other homophonic and rhythmic passages feature an interplay between “pizzicato” and “arco,” resulting in a varied texture. The harmonies are „friendly“ and I like that there is sometimes some „spice“ with dissonances. Form Development Structure Time: Even though I can’t identify any specific traditional form, such as ABA or rondo, the piece is nonetheless structured into, shall we say, “episodes,” which makes it more distinctive than other submissions that consist of an “endless” flow of motivic material. Originality Creativity: It was creative, not only to portrait a landscape as a „still life“ but telling a little story, the „lamento of the shepherd which lost (hopefully only one of) his sheep“. Especially the „coda“ (from mm. 89 on) reminds me of this lamento – while, fortunately, not in a deeply sad way, but in a somewhat humorous one! Score Presentation: The score is clean and easy to read. Instrumentation Orchestration Playability: The choice of using a string quartet as accompaniment and the English horn as the solo instrument gives the piece a rich, pastorale mood. I think, there are no playability issues. Execution of Given Challenge: The challenge of depicting a landscape and thus creating an image in the listener’s mind’s eye has been met with great success. Moreover, you successfully avoided the risk of creating an endlessly meandering flow of sounds by using simple but memorable motifs and a variety in the texture. Taste: I very enjoyed it with its calm and, at some passages, humorous character. Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 9 9 8.5 9 9 9 9 8 Average Score: 8.8125

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 8 9 8 10 10 9 7 7 Average 8.5 This was really well written piece and the score is beautiful. And I say this despite it not quite being to my taste. Your talent is very much recognized and appreciated

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 4 4 4 2 6 3 2 GoT Disqualified because string orchestra is not a 5 instrument ensemble. Otherwise average is 3.6 A sunset isn't a landscape, and the piece didn't really convey a sunset to me anyway. Sounded just like Game of Thrones. As a constructive note, Violas have only four strings and can't play a sextuple stop.

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 2 4 1 3 5 N/A 0 1 Disqualified, but otherwise average is 2.3 It really doesn't do what it's trying to very effectively. Nothing fugal about it.

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 7 8 5.5 1 7 10 8.5 6 Average 6.6 Not much going on motivically (not a bad thing) but the few that are present work well for the style, and I quite enjoy renaissance harmony. But I can't say it's original at all. Sounds like any other renaissance brass piece. The score is ok, be sure to put fermatas in all voices at the end. Not very well versed in the instrumentation, so I'll assume it's perfect, and the style and instrumentation certainly evokes the landscape. Good job overall.

Yes Good-Luck to all the Contestants.............................Although i think i know who's gonna Win it.

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 8 10 8 9.5 9.5 9 9 8 Average Score: 8.8 Review: This piece features a rich variety of motifs that also capture the pastoral mood. The textures are excellent, in my view, with sections where certain instruments fall silent (which I find an interesting way to thicken and thin out the textures and create contrasts), and there are many contrapuntal passages. At the same time, the lines are crafted with relative simplicity, without resorting to technically demanding or uncertain passages. I think it is an excellent approach to stick to what one knows is possible and make the most of it. The sections are distinct, but I also feel the overall impression is quite free. The score is very well presented. Although it is implied, given that the English horn is a transposing instrument, it might be worth mentioning that it is in concert pitch. There is one section which, I think, could be handled differently. Between bars 49 and 56, an attempt is made to create a climax leading into a new section and the entry of the English horn. However, I do not find this entirely effective as it relies on a ‘crescendo’ increase in volume; it would It is also worth mentioning that the English horn is pushed to its limits in the high register (I seem to recall a C5). However, the lower register does not appear to be explored, which is precisely where a standard oboe cannot reach.

If you intend to write romantic-styled piece, You may want a good melody to start the piece, like a singable theme which the listener can easily recognize throughout the piece. By good melody, in my humble opinion, should have "up's and down's" and good contrast other parts of the music. There are some horizontal motion but it is rather oblique and it does not stand out much from the accompliment. You may think it as a opera singer singing passionate tunes and interact with the orchestra. I would also expect more chromaticism in both the baseline and the melody. Candences. I would expect a stronger sense of cadences for the phrases in a romantic piece. It is like journey - you need some rest between the beautiful scenaries so you can stay energetic and focused. Your improvisation seems more modern to me as it reminds me of the never-ending minimalistic music with non-diatonic (non-triadic) lines. For the variety part, you may want to try with Change of tempos Change of baseline rhythms Change of scales/ modality ("colour") Change of timbre (high vs low register of the piano) Change of texture (Density of chords)

Hello there! The Sherphad's Lament Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 10. 10 10 10 9.5 10 9 10 Average Score:9.8 Review: The general score presentation and layout was clean and readable. There were a few collisions errs that were noticeable. With the given forces at play, this can be easily playable. There were no imbalances between strings and the E. Horn. Yes! this piece is creative and original in nature. The given forces create an interesting. There is interesting dovetailing with the strings. The strings provide a rich background and middle ground material while the EH carries the foreground material. This, indeed, creates a rich harmonic palate. What I am not sure about is the form of the piece. It seems to free form. Free form pieces (fantasia, preludes, and etc) tend to flow like a river. They have sections where previous comes back. But that depends, on the style and the composer. Here, I think the intent was to create fluid piece that logically flows from start to finish. The high use of motives was well done. The 6 minute mark is one minute above sweet mark. But that is fine. Overall, this is piece I enjoyed. Yes, it is hard to write something. That is where I am at. I am stuck too.

I didn't know the ship sank

Just a simple piano romance for my girlfriend Julia (for her birthday). Thanks for listening and I hope you enjoy and let me know what you think! A Romance.mp3 A Romance.pdf

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste N/A 7.5 8 9 1 5.5 7.5 7 Average 6.5 The piece was pretty fun, fairly simple too, and it sounds like good percussion music, but it seems like you maybe are more familiar with large percussion sections in bands rather than percussion ensembles, because I would NEVER write out so many staves for a single percussionist. And the amount of instruments each player has would be a pain to set up effectively in a concert hall. But again, the piece was enjoyable to listen to, and the idea of only percussion is fairly unique compared with other submissions

I wish you luck in the competition

A revamped and corrected version of a previously published prelude and fugue transposed from F-sharp minor to E minor, originally comprised of two separately uploaded works joined together as neatly as possible. YouTube video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMss1kFsid8 Prelude and Fugue in E minor.mp3 Prelude and Fugue in E minor.pdf

Can't wait to hear all the entries!

I apologize, I meant to respond to this part of your reply as well. You hit the nail on the head. "Warmth" isn't meant to portray the temperature of the surrounding landscape, rather, the warm feeling of entering the "home" space, or, as others would call it, your "sanctuary", a place of rest, safety, closeness to family... a place where you can be "you" unapologetically, without the judgement of the outside world. That kind of "warmth" :) -Unc