edfgi234

Thanks a lot @Luis Hernández and @MJFOBOE for your nice comments and feedback. Yes I lost the structure myself in the middle section. There were a fair few ideas to cram in that made it a bit of a mess. I'll have a think on how to sort that as I honestly don't know how atm. That's a good idea, I'll try to connect the two sections more smoothly. Hmm, I'm not actually sure if the full chords cause a problem in that aspect. When I attempted to play that chord it didn't seem to cause a problem (although I may be wrong). Cheers again, useful stuff.

An old piece I tried to update and make less messy (may or may not have worked). Any feedback would be great. Thanks

Thanks very much that's very nice to hear. Yes its very chromatic so was quite hard to work out how to make it sound natural and how to fit the sections together properly. I agree I did try to come up with a bit of a grander ending but I couldn't come up with anything that didn't sound cheesy, so I settled with the current ending. It means it is a bit anticlimactic. I see what you mean, the melodies can sometimes suit 3/4 or 4/4 without having to change constantly. I'll work on smoothing out those time signatures. Thanks again for the advice.

Lovely piece. Interesting harmonies and a nice listen.

Completely rewritten and a bit more consistent in mood. This is a new style of piece (at least in atmosphere) for myself and I'm sure there are problems with it. All feedback is appreciated greatly.

One thing I can say is that sometimes it is unclear what harmony is fitting with the melody. For example in bar 3 both the left and right hand play a D, so it doesn't sound clear what the chord is (I'm guessing G?). Whereas bar 6, the B and G together show that it is G major resolving into C (which is why two Cs works, as it's clear where the melody/harmony is leading). Its a nice little piece but sometimes can be a bit ambiguous. I'm not the best with musical theory so this is just a suggestion and may be wrong ITO theory.

Cheers @maestrowick. I'll put my name on, what happens if you don't put your name on works? Do you mean add more to each variation or add more variations? I won't lie I had to look up what a motive is, I'll certainly try to develop them. Thanks again.

Just completed this after spending two months trying to come up with something in F. Decided to experiment a bit here with weird rhythms etc. and don't know if it is a successful use of these things or not. Any advice/feedback is greatly appreciated, cheers. Also thanks @Tortualex, @maestrowick, @Jean Szulc and @J.Santos for your feedback on my previous Eb min. nocturne. I'll work on the suggested improvements but it will most likely take a while as it take me ages to come up with anything now.

I don't know much about discordant compositions such as this, but it was a marvellous listen. Thanks for sharing this piece.

Gradually trying to work up the keys. This nocturne is again an update like the Eb major one was. Its taking ages. Not sure about the time signatures or ending. No slurs as the software treats the slurs as a pedal sometimes. This piece might be a bit of a mess but don't know. Feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks very much.

I enjoyed this a lot. The range of ideas kept it very interesting throughout. I was a bit surprised at the start when after the intro it went to Eb major rather than G major/minor, but that's not a bad thing. Not much else I can say really, its lovely.

Its a nice listen. I do think the constant jumps back down the piano in the left hand are very difficult (but possible). I think more variation in both hands would be good, as the patterns are pretty much the same throughout the whole piece. The end was a nice change. Also, if played on a real piano, following the pedal notation would make the piece sound quite muddy. It does work here though.

Lovely stuff. As said before they're all playable. Are those photocopied images of the sheet music? They look a bit grainy.

Thanks again @Luis HernándezI appreciate the time you take to listen and give feedback for the pieces I put on here. Yes for some reason it sounded fine with all those changes from duplets to triplets. I'll probably name it rhapsody then.

Tried to improve on the old nocturne in Eb major. It was a real pain this one. Please let me know what you think and any feedback is good.