RDVMusic

Who are you to judge whether my pieces are perfect or not?

Thanks for the pdf recommendation. As I said, I'm always thankful for valid criticism. None of your other points is valid sadly. a.) This is a matter of taste. The piece is supposed to be Adagio, and the kind of notation is perfectly fine. b.) There's more than enough counterpoint going on between the Basso Continuo and the flute. The harpsichord only accompanies the flute in movements 1 and 3 since it's only Basso Continuo instrument here. Also, the piece is supposed to be a shepherd-like pastoral tune, I won't change anything about that. Counterpoint is not appropriate in this monody-like piece. c.) Maybe you'd think it's awe, I don't. d.) Again, the piece is supposed to be a pastoral, calm tune. The motion in it is a result of the changing harmonic schemes, the modulations and the walking-bass like Basso Continuo. This piece does not need any revision. I'm getting the feeling you didn't understand the piece completely if you'd give feedback like this. I'm thankful for the pdf tip though.

Alright, sorry for that, I'm always thankful for valid criticism.

I have accompanied flutists dozens of times, I know precisely how this instrument works. There is more than enough room for them to breathe in this piece. Also, since the cembalo is only a continuo instrument in movements 1 and 3, there is no reason to add any direct counterpunctal parts to it. Notice that the cembalo right hand in these movements is only figured bass which has been spelled out by me. Be reassured that these parts are perfectly fine for their baroque style.

Just joined here and decided to put one of my favourite pieces, my flute sonata which I wrote approximately one month ago.

It sounds like you looked at a Mahler symphony and roughly tried to recreate what elements he uses in which contexts. You did a good job, but most of the elements just feel too random.