Jump to content

accmacmusic

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About accmacmusic

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

accmacmusic's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/15)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Popular Rare
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

4

Reputation

  1. Triplets work fine. Sometimes I feel I cannot make out the two lines, but checking the score every consonance with direct motion is imperfect, so I must be wrong.
  2. Battly music is less battly than expected, Hero of the Rising Sun quite lovely.
  3. Recording is a bit rough indeed! I liked the counterpoint idea, even thought sometimes the bass line got difficult to follow/stiff! Nice motif too.
  4. It is not my genre, but well done the composition feels “complete” and there are nice passages to give a bit of variety (e.g. 1:00) to the piece too.
  5. The reharmonisation is not bad, it is more «eerie» and undefined than the one by M. Good job!
  6. Despite probably not getting the harmony (I need to look at the score) I have enjoyed this very much. Nice typesetting too.
  7. I like the harmony a lot, powerful. Unfortunately I am not listening with headphones, so I cannot pick up the melody very well.
  8. Excellent find, corrected now! The sample size was met! In both DOD1 and DOD2 we have N₁ + N₂ (so the sample listening to the original track plus the sample listening to the corrupted one) = 34. Having posted this here and on other forums and on IRC I expected a bit more — though dodecaphonic lovers are not easy to come by — but we reached the threshold. The ‘N’s are in the «descriptive statistics» tables, I will edit the article to make it clearer! A minor correction: we didn’t test Hₒ≠H₁, but Hₒ>H₁ (abusing notation, I should have said P(X>Y)). This is of course for efficiency reason (again, fewer observation needed for the same power!); you can check it in the ‘p’ of DOD2, which is extremely high despite the original/corrupted piece having a somewhat different distribution, because the corrupted version was rated higher! Thanks for the comments, if you have any more don’t be shy!
  9. Interesting composition, it gets lezz waltz-y at times which is nice and varied.
  10. Of course it is okay, nice to see that there are other poeple interested in these experiments! As now I need a drink, those hours staring at the monitor gave me a headache! 😆
  11. As promised in the other thread, I share with you the results of the «Dodecaphonic survey». A brief summary: Here is the full article: Who cares if I listen? A study of dodecaphonic music enjoyment. Thanks to everyone who took some time to fill in the answers, I really appreciate.
  12. I kinda like it dynamicless, it gives it an "otherly" interesting quality.
  13. I liked it instead, it conveyed the mood. The music video was pretty well done too.
  14. If you were aiming for a minimalistic aesthetic well done, those two sound like that to me!
  15. Not sure I appreciate the harpsichord that much, it seems a bit stiff — but I mostly like baroque stuff, so it might just be my expectations.
×
×
  • Create New...