A terrible reverb isn't going to come close to making it sound better. I play around with a lot of midi for fun (especially the midi.xp stuff meant for the Yamaha Disklavier system), and even a good sample isn't really needed to sound close, if the performance is realistic enough.
I could outline this by using GPO's Steinway Grand patch. My GPO is from 2004, and the thing can sound pretty rough at times. But it'll still sound fairly good if I run one of the performances Oscar Peterson sequenced himself.
You don't notice the lack of reverb when you're lost in the performance as well.
When making self-stylized glorifying remarks, please, at least leave us with the impression you know an inkling of grammar. You attempted to justify your composition, (and your lack of knowledge concerning the use of contemporary composition tools) with an unintelligible ramble, whose content, after crafting a translation, was pseudo-poetic and pathetic at best.
The response you gave illustrates the lack of understanding you have of your own composition, and your own musical philosophy. It does so to a degree much greater than anyone of us could possibly have explained. You sound (post translation) like you're regurgitating something an acolyte of John Cage might have once said, but you are missing the purpose of this point. Not only are you not satirizing or breaking any rules, you're just hitting random notes, with some major sevenths. The only doctrine it breaks from is that of common sense. It is no longer doctrine in today's classroom, but it is situations like this that prove it should be.
My conclusion? You're lazy. You're too lazy to study the fundamental 'rules' you're breaking (satirizing you called it? No one is laughing). Too lazy to learn to use fairly intuitive contemporary composition tools correctly; you're even too lazy to correctly type you're hacked together philosophy that only exists to support your ego and justify such senseless ideas.