Romanticist Posted February 29, 2008 Author Posted February 29, 2008 perhaps he has a life,:P Wait a second are you saying that I don't have a life?
Mark Posted March 4, 2008 Posted March 4, 2008 Geez how long are your movements? My movements wouldn't be that long, I'm just a slow worker. perhaps he has a life, No, I don't ;)
Romanticist Posted March 8, 2008 Author Posted March 8, 2008 geniousness isn't a word and makes you sound quite the opposite. I know it isn't but famousness is I made it up, along with Orchestrians which was the original name for the thread before it was relocated and renamed
robinjessome Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 Don't laugh at me. I followed the rules Sorry there's no MIDI, or mp3. Finale didn't play it right. ;) ...
Romanticist Posted March 16, 2008 Author Posted March 16, 2008 Don't laugh at me. I followed the rules Sorry there's no MIDI, or mp3. Finale didn't play it right. ;) ... AHHH! I love the finale the best robin ingenious ingenious!
virtualshock Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 Don't laugh at me. I followed the rules Sorry there's no MIDI, or mp3. Finale didn't play it right. ... In no way is that in barouque concerto form, :P :toothygrin:
robinjessome Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 In no way is that in barouque concerto form, :P What IS baroque concerto form?
virtualshock Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 The first major innovations in the development of the solo concerto were made by Antonio Vivaldi, who established the ritornello form: solo passages alternate with orchestral tutti[/b'], which often repeat the same material, giving unity to the movement. He established the three-movement form (fast
robinjessome Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 ritornello form should do the trick No one said anything about 'ritonello form' ... I just went from the posted rules. Must be in baroque concerto form (fast-slow-fast form along with Ritornellos or slow-fast-slow form along with ritarnellos and even a slow-slow-fast or fast-fast-slow form will be accepted (with ritarnellos)Ritornello= re-occuring themes in a piece played by the acc. instrument (piano) I have recurring themes. :whistling:
virtualshock Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 Overview2. Must be in baroque concerto form (fast-slow-fast form along with Ritornellos or slow-fast-slow form along with ritarnellos and even a slow-slow-fast or fast-fast-slow form will be accepted (with ritarnellos) Ritornello= re-occuring themes in a piece played by the acc. instrument (piano) You obviously didnt read this and your only recuring theme is in Part II, with the black blocky part in the violin also in part II you play Bb-C-E once then backward which is certainly genuis :thumbsup: I however am having difficulty playing this
robinjessome Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 You obviously didnt read this and your only recuring theme is in Part II, with the black blocky part in the violinalso in part II you play Bb-C-E once then backward which is certainly genuis :thumbsup: The 'theme' is the Bb, C, E in Part I (violin). It then recurs in the piano, Part II, and is presented again, in retrograde. Then, the retrograde recurs, back in the violin, Part III. Not recurring enough to be a ritornello? :whistling: I however am having difficulty playing this Sure. If you're unfamiliar with the notation and the concept as a whole, it won't work. In the right hands, it might sound like this: Malcolm Goldstein - violin
robinjessome Posted March 21, 2008 Posted March 21, 2008 alright fine I will let you off the hook:D Excellent! :thumbsup:
virtualshock Posted March 21, 2008 Posted March 21, 2008 just don't forget to post it in a future thread!
Eselbeus Posted March 21, 2008 Posted March 21, 2008 sounds cool, sign me up! About time I wrote a solo violin piece....
Romanticist Posted March 21, 2008 Author Posted March 21, 2008 sounds cool, sign me up! About time I wrote a solo violin piece.... Good, good I shall
Romanticist Posted April 14, 2008 Author Posted April 14, 2008 I bent the rules, I did A harp duet....shame on me
virtualshock Posted April 14, 2008 Posted April 14, 2008 really? have you turned over to the dark side:stoicsith: you will write a violin piece still right?
Romanticist Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 really?have you turned over to the dark side:stoicsith: you will write a violin piece still right? maybe I think that the violin sound horrible in finale..the harp is capable of doing more chords as well so anyway.. how comes YOUR piece? :)
virtualshock Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 It is coming around reasonably well, I have got a bunch of ideas I am just struggling on how to put them together, dont be Ridiculous though........ you will now work on your exhibition piece. OR ELSE:angry:
Romanticist Posted April 17, 2008 Author Posted April 17, 2008 It is coming around reasonably well,I have got a bunch of ideas I am just struggling on how to put them together, dont be Ridiculous though........ you will now work on your exhibition piece. OR ELSE:angry: Technically the harp duet is legal....according to the rules I made the rules ;)
virtualshock Posted April 17, 2008 Posted April 17, 2008 1. *Must be composed for violin and piano acc. except for rule #1...................;)
Recommended Posts