cygnusdei Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 I think the time is ripe to bring up this subject, which was broached on another thread earlier. Is creative freedom a fundamental right of a composer? I believe so, but I'm curious whether this seemingly universal truth is even in dispute. Are there boundaries to creative freedom, are there nuances? I'm interested in your opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSC Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 I think the time is ripe to bring up this subject, which was broached on another thread earlier. Is creative freedom a fundamental right of a composer? I believe so, but I'm curious whether this seemingly universal truth is even in dispute. Are there boundaries to creative freedom, are there nuances? I'm interested in your opinion. NOBODY DISPUTED THIS. You only brought this scraggy up because the other thread was closed, but NOBODY expressed that opinion in it except YOU. Jesus, stop the nonsense already. We know you're itching for an argument, but this isn't the way to do it. PS: Speaking of which, if anyone DOES dispute it, I will personally punch them myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cygnusdei Posted March 9, 2009 Author Share Posted March 9, 2009 NOBODY DISPUTED THIS.You only brought this scraggy up because the other thread was closed, but NOBODY expressed that opinion in it except YOU. Jesus, stop the nonsense already. We know you're itching for an argument, but this isn't the way to do it. Would you care to elaborate on the boundaries and nuances, if any? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSC Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Would you care to elaborate on the boundaries and nuances, if any? There's nothing to elaborate! Beyond the troll or two, nobody will dispute that you're free to write whatever you want. What the hell? If we're doing this, might as well open a thread titled "Do you guys like music?" and other such amazing insightful questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokkemon Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 EYE FINK ALL COMPOSTERS SHUD RITE WAT EVEA DEY WANT YO! :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cygnusdei Posted March 9, 2009 Author Share Posted March 9, 2009 There's nothing to elaborate! Are you sure? I seem to recall your theory on 'comfort zone'. How does it go again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferkungamabooboo Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 I keep trying to come up with reasons no. And I can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kromatozomika Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Creative freedom is an actualized artistic ethic to which a composer should aspire (key word), so I vote yes. The only conflict arises in the varying degrees of cultural information and existing work/study which may or may not inform the artist's choices, via personal taste or indoctrination. I think the latter does a lot more to inhibit any sense of goals within the scope of one's sense of personal freedom, but like all cultural information, we are, naturally, free to mature and emphasis or discard any components which are found to be helpful, or not. I can't see any reason to say no to this. But, hey, if anyone here is against creative freedom, they're likely to find other individuals somewhere on this planet who feel the same way - I strongly suspect they will not be on the majority, or really the relevant side of things....Only an informed guess though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jujimufu Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Do we need another one of those? I mean... please... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kromatozomika Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 404 Error Not Found Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jujimufu Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 405 Point Not Found Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kromatozomika Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 it IS a pointless thread....to be honest i just felt like typing, and there was a box below! dead, dead, dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathaniel Near Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Creative freedom is an actualized artistic ethic to which a composer should aspire (key word), so I vote yes. The only conflict arises in the varying degrees of cultural information and existing work/study which may or may not inform the artist's choices, via personal taste or indoctrination. I think the latter does a lot more to inhibit any sense of goals within the scope of one's sense of personal freedom, but like all cultural information, we are, naturally, free to mature and emphasis or discard any components which are found to be helpful, or not. I can't see any reason to say no to this. But, hey, if anyone here is against creative freedom, they're likely to find other individuals somewhere on this planet who feel the same way - I strongly suspect they will not be on the majority, or really the relevant side of things....Only an informed guess though... A sensible response. Congratulations, you have managed to not be a royal bumhole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
almacg Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 PS: Speaking of which, if anyone DOES dispute it, I will personally punch them myself. Well then you obviously don't believe in creative freedom, so punch yourself in the face and give yourself another from me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts