Schumann Posted March 11, 2009 Posted March 11, 2009 I create piece... I enjoy piece, reason for creating it However I come to learn the piece is not timed correctly Maybe this has to do with my mood then, when made But now I should wait for this forte, this chord, it sounds more professional It is catchier I like it better, it matches my scheme I know composers, old ones, famous ones, they are great, timing is wack... Who has perfect timing? depends on the ear that belongs to the perceiver Interpretation. Even prediction. Timing this could made room for this portion of the piece. Getting rid of this measure, does it slide the whole piece back one measure, or does it make a silent hole in piece? How do you perceive time? Will a blank measure have a rest or a note, or both? Where will that be, and will that be the beginning middle or end? Of what, the piece, the phrase, your life, or someone else's? A moment is really part of everything no? Not separate? What about two moments? What happens when one moment comes early... you have two moments happening simultaneously? Or does the first go... What happens to it? Change, destruction, division? Realization... Quote
SYS65 Posted March 11, 2009 Posted March 11, 2009 I Quite don't understand well your "subjet"...sorry... are you talking about BMP Speed ? Quote
SSC Posted March 11, 2009 Posted March 11, 2009 Time Cube But seriously, what's the idea again? In complete sentences if possible? Quote
RequiemAeternam Posted March 11, 2009 Posted March 11, 2009 Time CubeNuff said. OP, this should answer all of your questions, metaphysical or not. Quote
Cody Loyd Posted March 11, 2009 Posted March 11, 2009 Time CubeBut seriously, what's the idea again? In complete sentences if possible? This wold work better if whoever wrote it spelled everythang correctly. And complete sentances. You would be wiser if unschooled then be taught. Quote
Schumann Posted March 12, 2009 Author Posted March 12, 2009 Your knowledge of the book is only the title? Quote
robinjessome Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 Your knowledge of the book is only the title? What they're trying to say...is: WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Quote
Schumann Posted March 12, 2009 Author Posted March 12, 2009 What they're trying to say...is:WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Time, timing, how good they are at it. Quote
robinjessome Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 Time, timing, how good they are at it. Do you mean "Lengths of time"? "Rhythms"? "Tempos"? Who do you mean by they?? Again: WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Quote
Schumann Posted March 12, 2009 Author Posted March 12, 2009 Do you mean "Lengths of time"? "Rhythms"? "Tempos"? I explain in the OP. It is located on the page one before this one. I don't need rules. They're limited, knowledge isn't. I want thoughts, if anyone can think, they are one step ahead. Who do you mean by they?? By they I mean by your original reference they. Quote
Plutokat Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 You are not making any sense... what do you mean by timing? Quote
Cody Loyd Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 I am pretty sure we saw the OP.. and after seeing that we were still confused. Perhaps this discussion would work out if you tried again to explain what you are talking about. Is it timing as in where to switch to different sections of a piece or how long to make the intro/coda or whatever? That is what I got from the OP.. but then again I'm not really sure. Quote
Ananth Balijepalli Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 For your information, good sir... Nobody understands your original post. This is because it is incoherent babbling of an existential sort. We don't really care about existentialism. If you want an answer to your question, I suggest you a.) meditate, or b.) ask God. If you don't believe in God, then you'd better learn how to meditate fast. Oh, and by the way... Blue goats eat running lava from green cars that have lost wings because of E. Coli????? Quote
Plutokat Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 For your information, good sir...Nobody understands your original post. This is because it is incoherent babbling of an existential sort. We don't really care about existentialism. If you want an answer to your question, I suggest you a.) meditate, or b.) ask God. If you don't believe in God, then you'd better learn how to meditate fast. Oh, and by the way... Blue goats eat running lava from green cars that have lost wings because of E. Coli????? BRAVO good sir bravo Quote
Schumann Posted March 12, 2009 Author Posted March 12, 2009 You are not making any sence... what do you mean by timing? Why didn't I explain this well enough for you? I mention ridding of measures and how they are interpreted, waiting to use a chord or dynamic. None of this is sticking? Don't you write music, and do you not see it linearly on the paper you write? Music is existential, so that must be one key you don't have. Quote
composerorganist Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 Ah another merry go round thread! Thrilling!! Quote
Plutokat Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 Why didn't I explain this well enough for you? I mention ridding of measures and how they are interpreted, waiting to use a chord or dynamic. None of this is sticking? Don't you write music, and do you not see it linearly on the paper you write? and what does timing have to do with this... Unless you are writing music in real time, timing shouldnt be an issue. You should already know where all the pieces of your music should lie and measures shouldnt just be moving on there own. It seems like we are not writing the same kind of music as you. Quote
Schumann Posted March 12, 2009 Author Posted March 12, 2009 Ah another merry go round thread! Thrilling!! This is not a merry-go-round thread if someone could refer with context. Not everyone who wants to give an opinion about something should speak, if they can't express themselves in the first place. Catch what I am trying to say? and what does timing have to do with this... Unless you are writing music in real time, timing shouldnt be an issue. You should already know where all the pieces of your music should lie and measures shouldnt just be moving on there own.It seems like we are not writing the same kind of music as you. Measures don't move? Okay now you are starting to think. You are explaining yourself with context. This is good. My measures move, because when I hear a measure it is in front of me, and when it passes, it is somewhere else. It is reforming or possibly dying off. It could be recycled by the composer, or remade/combined. Quote
Cody Loyd Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 Why didn't I explain this well enough for you? THIS Quote
Cody Loyd Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 Not everyone who wants to give an opinion about something should speak, if they can't express themselves in the first place. ALSO THIS Quote
Qmwne235 Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 I think what the OP means is, "How good are you at waiting until just the right moment to create a change or effect in your music?" Quote
Ananth Balijepalli Posted March 12, 2009 Posted March 12, 2009 My timing comes from my internal music player. What sounds "right" to me is what I've been trained to have sound right. Listening to endless hours of music has trained me to recognize points where changes need to occur. A loss of a measure can't happen because measures are constructed within this player of mine. Now, this only works on the micro-musical level. At the structural level, the timing has come through practice and theory.. I always understood the OP.. I don't see the reason for ASKING it in the first place. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.