Justin Bush Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 I hope this does not seem like a stupid question to ask but is there a definitive format when writing an instrumental quintet? All of my music books as well as google are not being any help in turning up answers. Quote
musicdecomposed Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 A quintet can be any combination of instruments you wish. There are some standards (such as a woodwind quintet), but you can use whatever combination you wish...remember though, it's about balancing the sounds of separate instruments. Quote
Justin Bush Posted May 10, 2009 Author Posted May 10, 2009 Thanks. I was wondering more in terms of is there a set number of movements or a general format? (ie. tempos of movements etc.) Quote
jimmiew Posted May 10, 2009 Posted May 10, 2009 Not at all, a quintet is just the style of ensemble, you can write music in any form you wish. Quote
Guest QcCowboy Posted May 10, 2009 Posted May 10, 2009 in a very generalized sense, if you entitle your work "Quintet", other than the fact that there are 5 instrumentalists, there COULD be an expectation of more or less the same vague idea as when one writes a "string quartet"... ie: basically a sonata for multiple instruments. So in only the most generalized sense, titling a work "quintet" COULD have the listener expect to hear 3 or 4 movements, with more or less the same "alternating fast/slow" disposition one would find in a sonata or symphony. but basically, hey, it's up to you. you could write a "quintet" that is made up of 12 adagio movements, or a perfectly "classically" formed "sonata-allegro/scherzo/adagio/rondo" four-movement structure. as for ensemble make-up, well some ensembles are pre-existing, like the woodwind quintet (flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, horn). So calling a work "woodwind quintet" but NOT using this particular group of instruments might cause confusion, but certainly not "drama" hehehehehe On the other hand, a string quintet COULD be a number of dispositions. It could be 2 violins, 2 violas, 1 cello or 3 violins, 1 viola 1 cello or 2 violins, 1 viola, 2 celli or 2 violins, 1 viola, 1 cello, 1 contrabass. as long as the ensemble is relatively well-balanced... and even then! you could probably get away with writing a work for 1 violin and 4 contrabasses if you were particularly brilliant. (although your chances of getting it performed are always weaker when you break from the more-or-less standard make-up) Quote
nigelkeay Posted May 11, 2009 Posted May 11, 2009 Qc has covered the string combinations; all could probably be considered "standard" given who's written for them historically except perhaps 3 violins, 1 viola 1 cello. A mixed wind/string combination that I find works well is Prokofiev's (oboe, clarinet, violin, viola and double bass, although this formation has been little picked up by anybody else. Quote
Justin Bush Posted May 19, 2009 Author Posted May 19, 2009 Thanks to everyone who answered this thread, I have gathered all the answers I was looking for. :) Quote
Morivou Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 you could write a "quintet" that is made up of 12 adagio movements, PLEASE don't write a quintet with 12 adagio movements... I would cry... haha. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.