oxana Posted October 20, 2009 Posted October 20, 2009 The world of music copyright is evolving. Monopolies of collecting societies are under pressure. Composers complain about a lack of benefit, users about non-transparent and high tariffs. How do you manage your rights? Are you a member of a collecting society, do you use Creative Commons licenses or do you use VillaMusicRights licenses? Quote
icelizarrd Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 I'm strongly partial to the Creative Commons idea, but I guess I'm not 100% committed to the idea yet. I honestly like the "remix culture" that has developed on the internet, where fans make their own variations and projects out of other people's work; my main concern is when attribution is not properly supplied; my secondary concern, of course, is whether I can make a living while signing away a lot of rights for a piece. Quote
pianoman216 Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 Neither. I mail a copy of the piece to myself with the title, my name and the date composed written over the seal with clear tape cleanly over that. Then when it gets back to me I file away the postmarked envelope containing my piece. Then I can send the piece wherever/to whoever I want with out worry of it getting stolen, because I can very easily prove when I wrote the piece should the situation arise (Forging the postmark would be a federal offense, I believe)...And all for less than $2 :D Quote
Gardener Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 ^ But to circumvent that you don't need to forge a postmark. Simply send yourself an empty envelope without closing it, then you'll receive a postmarked envelope into which you could put a composition at -any- time and seal it. That's one reason why this method of "copyright protection" generally doesn't count much in court. The more reliable "cheap method" is simply showing it to people you know, thus creating living witnesses. But anyways, I don't think that's what the OP was getting at. The question here is the management of copy (and probably performance) rights, not necessarily their protection. Well, ACTUALLY, I think what the OP was getting at was spam/advertisement, judging from past posts of a similar nature. But as it stands now I don't think there's sufficient reason for deletion. Quote
icelizarrd Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 Oh, heck, you're right. I should have noticed that. I won't be offended if the thread is deleted :P Quote
Anders Posted October 30, 2009 Posted October 30, 2009 This is brilliant spam. I had no idea, and here i was googling villamusic licenses. I'll beon the lookout from now. *laughs* Quote
jack001 Posted November 11, 2009 Posted November 11, 2009 Music are protected under copyright, that means the person who pays for the music can use it. Music publishers are concerned with administering copyrights, licensing songs to record companies and others, and collecting royalties on behalf of the songwriter. Quote
Old Composer Posted November 11, 2009 Posted November 11, 2009 This is the most brilliant spam I've seen. I joined ASCAP....today. So we'll see how that goes. :) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.