Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Danny is right, it's "close." It's still a bit complicated, for instance, it seems like there are way too much tabs. But he mentioned something I noticed subconsciously - the RH website IS too narrow. Could it use more page width? This might be a one liner in the CSS for the developers.

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Actually, I agree. Make sure everything works on the latest IE, don't worry so much about 6, we're on 8 now. It's more trouble than it's worth when you can add a "best viewed in IE # or later, opera, ff, chrome, whatever else" Or perhaps a warning up top that only shows up when the page is loaded with an earlier version of IE, "best viewed .... " or "page requires IE # or later"

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I like to use the Classic for the forum.

Its more practical, since I am used to it. The tradeoff is that it seems like I'm working on two sites. RH and YC (forum)

I use the forum (not RH) to browse the pieces. Monitor the new ones, look for reactions. Too bad the RH layout is not as easy to oversee...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...