PianoOnWheels Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 The interpretations of Rondo alla Turca's tempo seem to range from fairly slowly to The piece is simply marked "Allegretto" which doesn't offer much help. So the question is, what tempo do you like the most? PoW Quote
roy Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 I don't really mind either way. It should above all be played in a tempo in which the pianist can comfortably get around the notes and force his interpretation on the piece with authority. The 'very quickly' link isn't that quickly though, but I personally like a tempo somewhere inbetween. Here's a(nother) nice performance (by a somewhat strange chap): Quote
SergeOfArniVillage Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 Rondo Alla Turca is really just a vibrant, show-off-your-quick-fingers kind of piece, not one for contemplation or savoring every note, etc., in my opinion. Play it as fast as you can while trying to keep it as clean as possible, I say :happy: 2 Quote
Guest John Pax Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 I personally play it close to a Presto. That said, my all time favorite performance of it is Glenn Gould's and he's closer to Andante. Play it where you feel comfortable and can best express what it is you want. Quote
Berlioz Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Ever heard Rachmaninov's unusual interpretation? Quote
Daniel Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Definitely should be a moderate Allegretto. Gould pretty much nails it, tempo-wise. Quote
Berlioz Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 Gould's version is ridiculous, regardless of how good a pianist he is. :P Quote
parkalex100 Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 I like this tempo on guitar. With piano though, it could be a little faster. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPP0_va2krc Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.