Lifeforce Of Musiotics

Yeah! Linux is very fast! :shiftyninja:

So you use linux?

So you use linux?

Melodies which i call superharmonics are very interesting for their mechanics even when the most simple are ambiguous in the most complete & astronomical degrees with multiple designations as not only what harmonies they appear to designate but their utmost enigmatic logic of their modus as someone one day might decode superharmonies to a formula of up & down mathematical ratios to produce even bonafide mozartnian melodies taking into account the two main factors of melodies: 1-note durations(rhythms) & 2-Digital Modus. Melodies in the most sophisticated yet fundamental perspective are transcendental mysteries. :musicwhistle:

" The Quintions " -+(07072012)

By

Kristoval Caladant Luzius Amadat Crissagrim

1st-C-C+=octave or 13 (13) (Atributed to me)

2nd-C-F#-C+=Tritonus (77) (Atributed to me)

3rd-C-E-A-flat-C+=Augmented or + (555) (Atributed to me?)

4th-C-E-flat-F#-A-C+=Diminished (4444) (Atributed to me)

5th-C-D-E-F#-A-flat-B-flat-C+=Wholetone (333333)(Atributed to Wayne Scales & jrCramer)

Only five (like the Platonic Solids) because thereafter the multiples are repetative by octave inversions. As to the mystery of why only five may lie in some unknown secret regarding the circle of fifths.

These are the only five possible musical harmonic chordal contants within the 12 chromatic spectrum on C or relatively speaking from any note within the perfect system of numeration ( system 1 ) which follows the formula= Count a number from say C, say 7 & from that digital result count again 7 until the math becomes definitive or merely repetative after that in other words reaches the 1st beginning note an octave higher.

The other system ( System 2 ) of numeration is unrealible to present any constants in music because it goes on forever & more importantly it rotates relatively through the entire twelve digits. This system of math starts at any key say C to a definitive number say 7, then from the next being 8 the cycle continues by again a factor of 7 but it never arrives at the initial root being C until after the 12 chromatic spectrum has been collected thus you might as well start at C & in an executive progression go one by one to the C an octave higher. This analysis presented positives & negatives:

1st=1 negative, non-definitive

2nd=2-wholetone,negative

3rd=3,C-D-F-A-flat-B-D,negative(No Root)

4th=4,C-E-flat-G-B-E-flat,negative because the root in anihilated

5th=5,C-E-A-D-G-C,positive,arrives at C but mutates thereafter

6th=6,C-F-B-F,negative(does not arrive at the root, it dissappears

7th=7,C-F#-C#-A-flat-E-flat-B-flat-F-C,positive but mutates

8th=etc., pointless multiples......

The conclusion is definitive that this system of numeration is imperfect, asymmetrical, unsolid, inconcrete, & unreliable because it offers no constants & it goes on indefinitely never to arrive at the root until diametric rotation of the great twelve, great because of it's pythagorian unprecedence & the analogy if more than analogy to the geometry of the universe which is represented by twelve pentagons.

In conclusion, a 3rd system of numeration which is count from say C four degrees upward not counting C as part of those 4s repeatedly by fours until the C is reached an octave higher without covering the great twelve. This system concluded the same results as the first system above though the quintions were inverted. Thus this concludes this study on an initial basis though further studies would entail why the quintions are so outstanding maybe unprecedented just like the five polyhedra perhaps even in paralleled juxtaposition to each other scientifically & not just analogically. :D

That's what she said.

That's what she said.

That's what I've been trying to say all along.

" The Quintions " -+(07072012)

By

Kristoval Caladant Luzius Amadat Crissagrim

The 5 Polyhedra:

1st-C-C+=octave or 13 (13) (Atributed to me) Octahedron(Factor 8)

2nd-C-F#-C+=Tritonus (77) (Atributed to me) "Pyramidol"Tetrahedron(Factor 3)

3rd-C-E-A-flat-C+=Augmented or + (555) (Atributed to me?) Dodecahedron(Factor 5)

4th-C-E-flat-F#-A-C+=Diminished (4444) (Atributed to me) Cube(Factor 4)

5th-C-D-E-F#-A-flat-B-flat-C+=Wholetone (333333)(Atributed to Wayne Scales & jrCramer) Isosahedron(Factor 6)

Only five (like the Platonic Solids) because thereafter the multiples are repetative by octave inversions. As to the mystery of why only five may lie in some unknown secret regarding the circle of fifths.

These are the only five possible musical harmonic chordal contants within the 12 chromatic spectrum on C or relatively speaking from any note within the perfect system of numeration ( system 1 ) which follows the formula= Count a number from say C, say 7 & from that digital result count again 7 until the math becomes definitive or merely repetative after that in other words reaches the 1st beginning note an octave higher.

The other system ( System 2 ) of numeration is unrealible to present any constants in music because it goes on forever & more importantly it rotates relatively through the entire twelve digits. This system of math starts at any key say C to a definitive number say 7, then from the next being 8 the cycle continues by again a factor of 7 but it never arrives at the initial root being C until after the 12 chromatic spectrum has been collected thus you might as well start at C & in an executive progression go one by one to the C an octave higher. This analysis presented positives & negatives:

1st=1 negative, non-definitive

2nd=2-wholetone,negative

3rd=3,C-D-F-A-flat-B-D,negative(No Root)

4th=4,C-E-flat-G-B-E-flat,negative because the root in anihilated

5th=5,C-E-A-D-G-C,positive,arrives at C but mutates thereafter

6th=6,C-F-B-F,negative(does not arrive at the root, it dissappears

7th=7,C-F#-C#-A-flat-E-flat-B-flat-F-C,positive but mutates

8th=etc., pointless multiples......

The conclusion is definitive that this system of numeration is imperfect, asymmetrical, unsolid, inconcrete, & unreliable because it offers no constants & it goes on indefinitely never to arrive at the root until diametric rotation of the great twelve, great because of it's pythagorian unprecedence & the analogy if more than analogy to the geometry of the universe which is represented by twelve pentagons.

In conclusion, a 3rd system of numeration which is count from say C four degrees upward not counting C as part of those 4s repeatedly by fours until the C is reached an octave higher without covering the great twelve. This system concluded the same results as the first system above though the quintions were inverted. Thus this concludes this study on an initial basis though further studies would entail why the quintions are so outstanding maybe unprecedented just like the five polyhedra perhaps even in paralleled juxtaposition to each other scientifically & not just analogically. :D

Edited "The Quintions" post with further criteria after some minimal brainstorming. Consult the previous. :D

OK enough, getting sick of this topic floating up over and over with nonsense. It's pretty much comparable to timecube at this rate and honestly this isn't Marzique's goddamn personal blog.

If anyone has any REAL interest in debating the stuff he's posting, PM me and I'll reopen the thread.