Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Something i've always wanted to know is if it's possible, in Sibelius 7, to write augmented unisons like this that are found in a lot of 20th century music. And if not, how happy are performers to read augmented unisons in the way that sibelius automatically places them (I always thought it looked very confusing)? Thanks very much!

Posted

It's possible but I would recommend doing a different method since that style of notation isn't very clear anyway. 

 

I would agree, the only time I've seen that style is with large clusters that simply won't fit all together. If all you are doing is an augmented unison, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the more traditional style.

Posted

It could be justified in the proper context.

 

The only one I can think of is if the composer is prioritizing the preservation of spelling to relate function (something I've done in the past myself which yielded impractical scores littered with double sharps/flats and things). Other than this, I couldn't imagine stem-splitting to be a viable solution until at least 3 adjacent notes come into the picture. 

Posted

The only one I can think of is if the composer is prioritizing the preservation of spelling to relate function (something I've done in the past myself which yielded impractical scores littered with double sharps/flats and things). Other than this, I couldn't imagine stem-splitting to be a viable solution until at least 3 adjacent notes come into the picture. 

 

Some people prefer impractical scores.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...