Ken320 Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 (edited) This was in the archives and some folks here may remember it. The bass, cello and brass are new instruments, and I added some new material as well. I think mostly everything else in the archives can stay there, but this is worth a repost. Edited June 11, 2016 by Ken320 MP3 Play / pause JavaScript is required. 0:00 0:00 volume > next menu Windermere > next PDF Windermere Quote
Luis Hernández Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 Wow... I don't know the previous material but I'm stunned. The integration of the new instruments is perfect. Besides, the piece is nice, interesting, colorful. Again, I like you have chosen a few instruments. Inspiring. Quote
Ken320 Posted June 11, 2016 Author Posted June 11, 2016 6 hours ago, Luis Hernández said: Wow... I don't know the previous material but I'm stunned. The integration of the new instruments is perfect. Besides, the piece is nice, interesting, colorful. Again, I like you have chosen a few instruments. Inspiring. Thanks, Luis. When you say 'chosen a few instruments' I think you refer, basically, that the orchestra is not playing tutti all the time. But I think that if this were played by a real orchestra, I would have to double some parts throughout to get the same sound. Otherwise there would be holes and it could sound, how can I say, sort of empty. However, the piece as is might work with lots of microphones. Quote
fishyfry Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 I really enjoy the brilliant colors in this piece. The liveliness and rhythm of it makes me wonder if it is a product of the Beethoven studies that inspired that other great orchestral work of yours. Quote
Ken320 Posted June 26, 2016 Author Posted June 26, 2016 On 6/24/2016 at 1:46 AM, fishyfry said: I really enjoy the brilliant colors in this piece. The liveliness and rhythm of it makes me wonder if it is a product of the Beethoven studies that inspired that other great orchestral work of yours. Thank you! But no. I wrote this before I read about Beethoven. But Beethoven is such a ubiquitous presence without knowing the particulars. It's just in the common language, you know. I just think in terms of fast and slow. In this case, for fast, I probably thought Stravinsky, a neo classical thing. Quote
Sojar Voglar Posted June 26, 2016 Posted June 26, 2016 Lovely scherzo-like piece. However, I get the impression you will continue to work on this piece to become a proper composition or a part of a large symphony. I don't find this composition to be complete. It ends too suddenly and it does not have a major climax anywhere. So I will be looking forward to the development of this music, it is very promising. Good luck! :) Quote
Ken320 Posted June 27, 2016 Author Posted June 27, 2016 Thank you for your comments, Sojar. You have mentioned the issue of length in my work before and I am working on longer things with new material, but I don't think I will use this as source material. It's kind of old and I wouldn't know what to do to lengthen it. I don't have the interest. I thought it worked as a miniature with a few good ideas. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.