What composer do you admire the most? Why?

As the title suggests i want to know what composer you guys admire the most, Baroque, Romantic, Renaissance, 20th century...etc,  and why you admire that particular composer.

For me personally it is kind of hard to choose but i would ultimately go with Amadeus Mozart for his exceptional ability to compose simple-sounding (almost childish-like) music, which from my point of view no other composer has ever achieved without sounding like just a straight copy of Mozart.  There are, of course, a few pieces of his that break this little tradition like his Fantasia in C minor along with the Fantasia in D minor...etc.

I admire Dave Brubeck, the most, I listened to his music the most in my life, and i keep coming back to his compositions, ofcourse he is a jazz player and not an average composer, but he still made a lot of progress for jazz quartet ensemble and improvisation also, later in his life he went to the more composery style of music ment for church. another thing he really can capture is a place or nature, he made a whole album about japan, with great influences from there,(fuyijama and koto song) also i like his life, and smile in the pictures. And to be honest, he got me through hard times when i was younger, 

Just now, Casper Belier said:

I admire Dave Brubeck, the most, I listened to his music the most in my life, and i keep coming back to his compositions, ofcourse he is a jazz player and not an average composer, but he still made a lot of progress for jazz quartet ensemble and improvisation also, later in his life he went to the more composery style of music ment for church. another thing he really can capture is a place or nature, he made a whole album about japan, with great influences from there,(fuyijama and koto song) also i like his life, and smile in the pictures. And to be honest, he got me through hard times when i was younger, 

 

Cool, i didn't expect Dave Brubeck to be mentioned here! I used to listen to him a bit but that was when i used to have an interest in Jazz (by no means a bad genre IMO)

1 minute ago, RequiemLord said:

Cool, i didn't expect Dave Brubeck to be mentioned here! I used to listen to him a bit but that was when i used to have an interest in Jazz (by no means a bad genre IMO)

 

i think Dave Brubeck's ouevre is really an classically inspired jazz oeuvre, you can hear it all the time, no messy chords, very structured. always using counterpoint which is a rare with most jazz pianist!

Just now, Casper Belier said:

i think Dave Brubeck's ouevre is really an classically inspired jazz oeuvre, you can hear it all the time, no messy chords, very structured. always using counterpoint which is a rare with most jazz pianist!

 

I think that is what i liked about his music, quite organized and clear.

I take issue with a whole bunch of things that have been said, but won't bother calling either of you out on them ;) 

Dave Brubeck's stuff may be "clean" and organized College jazz, but it it was the clever use of odd-meter and unorthodox rhythmic play that makes it interesting. Keeping it clean and accessible was challenging. Also, as a pioneer of the Cool school / West Coast / Third Stream jazz styles the relaxed & laid-backedness was a unique voice in jazz, and helped pave the way for a lot of experimentation in cross-cultural and genre-bending styles. 

Hmmm, that is a way hard question. I am a huge fan of so many things. I have a whole lot of favorites for different eras or genres and for different reasons. I like several types of compositions and techniques and ways of expressing and I think a lot of different composers do those things I like at different times. I am not an incredibly huge fan of the old clean and cut traditional sounding composition. That is to say that when Bach or whomever writes a piece they write with so many rules and such structure that it doesn't feel as natural and as free and expressive to me as later music got to be. That is not to say that I cannot appreciate things that occur in that music or that I don't realize the brilliance of their art for the time that it was composed. For instance, though I am not an inordinately strong fan of the Baroque or Classical eras a few of my top favorite pieces come from those eras. I am extremely impressed with Bach's Goldberg Variations and I absolutely love listening to them played. I am very fond of Bach's Jesu Meine Fruede. I really love parts of Handel's Messiah (especially Worthy is the Lamb). Bach's Suite for solo Cello stands out to me as an iconic piece for great reasons and I acknowledge the reasons why. Albinoni's Adagio for strings and Organ is a standout piece of music in all of music history. I give credit to Mozart for his Requiem Mass. On the whole I think Mozart is one of the most overrated composers of all time. I understand that his music served a purpose and it pushed the succession of ideas along in classical music in a chronological sense. However, I don't find most of it to be that creative or fulfilling. I do love me some Beethoven. I have no love to show for his piano concertos but just about everything else gets me going. He is the king of the symphony. His piano sonatas are great. I don't care for the operas, but the Overture to Egmont is great music. 

All that being said, my thing, the stuff that gets me fired up, is when music became about emotion and expression to an almost over the top grandeur. There is a pocket of things that sing to me - that make life worth living. You could possibly split the stuff I love into two categories - still classically structured and not (the modern stuff). We would be talking anything from Greig to Beethoven to Tchaikovsky and on the other side anything from Barber to Messiaen and Bernstein and Stravinsky and John Adams. Then there was a time that came that pushed it too far and I have nothing positive to say about that whole lot of stuff. I would consider all that to be garbage. What I would consider "that" to be would be anything like John Cage, all the later Schoenberg, I find Charles Ives' music to be inane and fruitless, Boulez, Legeti, Stockhausen, Xenakis, Penderecki and even Crumb, John Coolidge Adams, Christopher Rousse. I don't like any of that at all. In general I sum it up as noise. My favorite later, but still somewhat classically structured composers are probably Camille Saint-Saens, Edward Grieg, Sergei Rachmaninoff, Tchaikovsky, Dvorak, Verdi, Puccini. I am also really fond of the french Impressionists Debussy, Ravel, and even Satie. Scriabin just floats out there in his own realm - he is on my top 5 favorite composers list. Then you go into possibly what is my top favorite area and that is your Samuel Barber, Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, George Gershwin. I really like the late romantic/contemporary American stuff. I love me some Prokofiev. Messiaen is extremely interesting to me. If the one previously mentioned isn't my favorite genre or area in music then this is - I am hugely fond of this new stuff. It is basically anything that has to do with the Atlanta School of Composers. I love Theofanidis, Micahel Gandolfi, but especially Adam Schoenberg and Jennifer Higdon. Also, John Adams - he is not one of that school, but he is incredible. 

So, all of that being said I would have to take into consideration my type of style and the entirety of a composers life work. When I do that there are a few composers that pop out to me. Probably on more days than not I would give my top spot to Samuel Barber. Some days I would go with John Adams and some with Adam Schoenberg. Though, most of the time I would probably feel Samuel Barber out the most. This is still hard to say because so many of my top moments in musical history are from a varied group of composers. I think if I were to have to list off what I would consider to be the great compositions - the greatest moments in music- for me it would have to include Aaron Copland's 3rd Symphony, Aaron Copland's El Salon Mexico, Scriabin's Poem of Ecstasy, Scriabin's Etude in D sharp Minor Op. 8/12 (to sneak one of my all time favorite piano pieces in the list), Aram Khachaturian's Violin Concerto (especially the second but also the third movements), Bela Bartok's Miraculous Mandarin, Camille Saint-Saens Organ Symphony, Saint-Saens 2nd Piano Concerto, Theofanidis's Rainbow Body, Debussy's La Mer, Grieg's Piano concerto in A Minor, Andante Religioso from Grieg's Holberg Suite, the whole last movement or two of Mahler's 2nd symphony, The Finale to Stravinsky's Firebird Suite, the Dharma at Big Sur by John Adams, Bernstein's Chichester Psalms, Bernstein's On the Waterfront, Marjan Mozetich's Passion of Angels Harp Concerto, the Interlude from Cavelleria Rusticana by Mascagni, Ravel's Daphnis et Chloe, Ravel's Jeux D'eau to throw in another favorite piano piece, also Ravel's Pavane pour une infante definite, Michael gandolfi's Garden of Cosmic Speculation (especially the movement entitled The Quark Walk), the very last movement of Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time, the finale from The Pines of Rome by Respighi, Tchaikovsky's 1812 Overture, Tchaikosvy's March Slave, Rachmaninoff's Isle of the Dead, Rachmaninoff's entire 2nd piano concerto, Samuel Barber's Symphony 1, Samuel Barber's 2nd Essay for Orchestra, Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings, Barber's Medea's Meditation and Dance of Vengeance, Finale from Prokofiev's Cinderella Ballet, Procession of the Fallen and Judgement of the Prisoners and the final chorus from Prokofiev's Alexander Nevsky, Final to Prokofiev's Ivan the Terrible score, Messiaen's Turangalila Symphony, John Adam's Short Ride in a Fast Machine, John Adam's Lollapalooza, John Adam's Harmonium, John Adam's Chairman Dances, Jennifer Higdon's On a Wire, Adam Schoenberg's Finding Rothko, Adam Schoenberg's American Symphony, Adam Schoenberg's Picture Studies (especially the kandinsky portion), Adam Schoenberg's La Luna Azul. 

There are probably a few pieces I missed out on, but that is about all of what will get me going the best. Obviously, I am a huge Prokofiev, John Adams, Adam Schoenberg, Samuel Barber, etc. fan. Though I think the simple answer to your question is Samuel Barber 6 out of 7 days.

I like some of J.S Bach music very very much. 

Especially the piece called "Air". This piece, I consider to be my favorite composition of all time. 

A composer like Philip Glass has been a huge influence on me as a composer. I feel in love with his style, the first I time I heard his music.

Composers like Jean michel Jarre and Mike Oldfield has also been a big influence.

I tend to think of my own music as a mix between the style of these 3 composers.

Maybe there is also a very very little bit of Bach in my music. :-)

Composers that I admire and that have influenced me are Schubert, Dvorak, Beethoven, Mozart, Schumann and Chopin. Schubert has many qualities that have inspired me, like his singing melodies, daring harmonies and amazing orchestrations. Dvorak has a slavonic quality to his music wich has also inspired me greatly. I admire these two composers the most.

The composers I admire, but who have not influenced me (at least not on purpose) are the Bachs, Haydn, Mahler, Brahms and a lot more.

5 hours ago, Kimoworld said:

I like some of J.S Bach music very very much. 

Especially the piece called "Air". This piece, I consider to be my favorite composition of all time. 

A composer like Philip Glass has been a huge influence on me as a composer. I feel in love with his style, the first I time I heard his music.

Composers like Jean michel Jarre and Mike Oldfield has also been a big influence.

I tend to think of my own music as a mix between the style of these 3 composers.

Maybe there is also a very very little bit of Bach in my music. :-)

 

 

 

I personally am not a big fan of J.S. Bach but i do love listening to his works for Solo Cello and a bit of his music for piano (well, at least i like it when they are played on the piano).

I am not sure about the other composers you mentioned though, can't say i have heard of them (maybe Philip Glass but that is about it).

3 hours ago, DirkH said:

Composers that I admire and that have influenced me are Schubert, Dvorak, Beethoven, Mozart, Schumann and Chopin. Schubert has many qualities that have inspired me, like his singing melodies, daring harmonies and amazing orchestrations. Dvorak has a slavonic quality to his music wich has also inspired me greatly. I admire these two composers the most.

The composers I admire, but who have not influenced me (at least not on purpose) are the Bachs, Haydn, Mahler, Brahms and a lot more.

 

 

I have come across all of the great (arguably of course) composers you listed and by far the only ones that i don't exactly like are Schumann and Dvorak (I adore some of his works though).  

2 minutes ago, RequiemLord said:

I have come across all of the great (arguably of course) composers you listed and by far the only ones that i don't exactly like are Schumann and Dvorak (I adore some of his works though).  

 

What works don't you like by Schumann and Dvorak? And I am also interested wich works you do like written by them?

I'm on a Rimsky-Korsakov kick now.  However, my rotation stays Rachmaninoff, Mendelssohn, Beethoven, Strauss, John Williams, and crazy ol' Wagner.

Mahler, Stravinsky, and Debussy are huge for me. Whenever I listen to any of their pieces I am always inspired to try to learn their techniques. That way, if I'm lucky, maybe I'll be able to rip them off effectively.

21 hours ago, maestrowick said:

I'm on a Rimsky-Korsakov kick now.  However, my rotation stays Rachmaninoff, Mendelssohn, Beethoven, Strauss, John Williams, and crazy ol' Wagner.

 

Scheherazade sounds more and more repetitive and tiresome the more I hear it. It's got no spark any more, including the orchestration.

I've always felt that if I could just master orchestration I would be so much better at composition. Ravel, Prokofiev, Strauss, and Respighi are great at that; I've spent countless hours staring at Daphnis and Chloe/Death and Transfiguration's scores and just feeling utterly inferior.

1 hour ago, Ken320 said:

Scheherazade sounds more and more repetitive and tiresome the more I hear it. It's got no spark any more, including the orchestration.

 

What about the other big Korsakov pieces? Symphony 2, Capriccio, Coq d'Or, etc.?

9 hours ago, Monarcheon said:

What about the other big Korsakov pieces? Symphony 2, Capriccio, Coq d'Or, etc.?

 

I prefer the third, personally.

17 hours ago, Monarcheon said:

I've always felt that if I could just master orchestration I would be so much better at composition. Ravel, Prokofiev, Strauss, and Respighi are great at that; I've spent countless hours staring at Daphnis and Chloe/Death and Transfiguration's scores and just feeling utterly inferior.

 

17 hours ago, Monarcheon said:

I've always felt that if I could just master orchestration I would be so much better at composition. Ravel, Prokofiev, Strauss, and Respighi are great at that; I've spent countless hours staring at Daphnis and Chloe/Death and Transfiguration's scores and just feeling utterly inferior.

*****************

Are you studying with anyone? I'm reading Stravinsky's autobiography and he states that when he studied with Rimsky, he would give him piano versions of operas he was working at, with the instructions to orchestrate it. Stravinsky would bring back his orchestration and they would compare it to Rimsky's ordchestrations, which were always better. Stravinsky had to defend and explain his choices and they would discuss their differences. They did this for three years. So in a very real way, Stravinsky learned composing by orchestrating.

.

Edit: Whoops, very old post.