Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting little piece here... 
1. The 3/4 + 5/4 pattern in the "main section" is an interesting touch; why did you choose to use that?
2. Things could have more impact, especially when repeated. You start the first main section with sounds that have a very slow attack envelope, and I'd suggest either something is done about it both times, or it's changed in the second time, since it's so climactic where it comes in.
3. With such a versatile melodic fragment you repeat a lot, I think it's possible to go places outside of D minor if you ever chose to revisit this piece; harmonic development engages audiences when expectations are set.
4. The "climax buildup" at around 1:23 severely lacked the drive to make those next punches sound forceful or fulfilled. I notice a lack of percussion in this piece and I think it could really benefit from things that both define the beat better and help support things that are passing beats or off beats.

It's generally nice! I just wish there was more. Cheers!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

i agree that it could have used more percussion and maybe go other places than D minor-G minor and A major I don't know much about music theory(but i hope to learn more in the future :)) most of the piece was composed by trying to find out what sounds good(a bit like how you do in ear training) so that might explain a little if some things seems a bit off 

but there is definitely some things i need to think about :)

thanks for your comment :)

kind regards :)

Edited by Bjarke

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...