Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I wrote this piece at the beginning of last year and, while it's not really my style anymore, I still think it's quite nice so I thought I'd share it. :)

I was fortunate enough to get a performance of it from the Kokoro Ensemble; I do have a recording of the performance but unfortunately, I'm not allowed/don't have the rights to share it on social media and forums. However, I do have a recording of the piece when it was being workshopped (see the mp3 below).

MP3
0:00
0:00
  • Like 1
Posted

Use of deliberate crossed voices is pulled off well here. Good job; that's not easy.
I would experiment, in your score, with the use of decimal time signatures since sometimes I get the feeling you want is not a subdivision to fit the meter, but a continuous line with an uncomfortable amount extra.
Notation in the beginning with the ties is kind of weird; I'm not sure if it's super necessary to do it that way. Even if you're trying to show the relationships.
Measure before D (C major cadence) was really out of place for me, not exactly in a good way. It might have even been better to transition directly into the fast section and avoid fumbling around with a new fundamental.
The end was a little bit of awkward mode mixture, unsure if the A major was the new I or the IV. Clever, but a little confusing.
Overall, this a great piece. Come back to this style occasionally! It's nice. :)

Posted
11 hours ago, Monarcheon said:

Use of deliberate crossed voices is pulled off well here. Good job; that's not easy.
I would experiment, in your score, with the use of decimal time signatures since sometimes I get the feeling you want is not a subdivision to fit the meter, but a continuous line with an uncomfortable amount extra.
Notation in the beginning with the ties is kind of weird; I'm not sure if it's super necessary to do it that way. Even if you're trying to show the relationships.
Measure before D (C major cadence) was really out of place for me, not exactly in a good way. It might have even been better to transition directly into the fast section and avoid fumbling around with a new fundamental.
The end was a little bit of awkward mode mixture, unsure if the A major was the new I or the IV. Clever, but a little confusing.
Overall, this a great piece. Come back to this style occasionally! It's nice. :)

 

Glad you liked it. I've never heard of decimal time signatures. How would I use it and what advantages does it have over writing, say, 3.5/4 as 7/8.

 

Posted

I don't personally use them that often since players and conductors would get mad at me, but when I really want to emphasize the power of the beat, but with a slight alteration, like say a march, I use them to communicate that. Like I said, use them sparingly, because it's definitely not standard and people will get mad at you if it's not totally justified.

Screen Shot 2017-07-26 at 7.07.00 AM.png

Posted

Wow, this was really well done. You clearly know what you're doing, @punintentional. I love the instrumentation and the mood of this piece.

I don't really have much to offer in the way of suggestions, other than that, given the preceding complexity, maybe the final chord could be something a bit more spicy than just the simple E Major (adding a sixth, seventh or ninth might achieve what I'm thinking).

Really good work! I'll have to up my game for the summer competition :blush2:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...