Luis Hernández Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 An Amelia is an ornamental tree I have in my garden. (The score and audio has been changed a little. There was a mistake in a note that Monarcheon found, and m. 32 was unnecessary).. florida amelia - SCORE.pdf MP3 Play / pause JavaScript is required. 0:00 0:00 volume > next menu waltz > next PDF florida amelia - SCORE Quote
Monarcheon Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 Lovely. Only measures that threw me off were mm. 23 and 32; 23 because of the G vs. Gb I'm not sure was intentional, and 32 because of the stillness of the progression highlighted rather basically by the right hand unlike the wonderful motion of the rest of the piece. Modulations were spot on. :) Quote
Luis Hernández Posted August 1, 2017 Author Posted August 1, 2017 3 hours ago, Monarcheon said: Lovely. Only measures that threw me off were mm. 23 and 32; 23 because of the G vs. Gb I'm not sure was intentional, and 32 because of the stillness of the progression highlighted rather basically by the right hand unlike the wonderful motion of the rest of the piece. Modulations were spot on. :) Thanks, that was a mistake, I'll fix it. In this case the cord can be Eb or Ebm, but not both... (In other context I wouldn't mind...). Modulation took some time to think ... The second part (m. 18...) is a reflection of the previous one (a fashionable stuff, not new, I like to experiment with). But when I mirrored the part following the tonic-dominant axis (Ab - Eb) it was strange, and I transposed the inverted part a second high. Well, sometimes I like to explain a bit what I'm doing. .... And yes, m. 32 is out of place, there's no need to prolong the tonic so long. Out. Thanks again, you have a wonderful ear! Quote
Luis Hernández Posted August 18, 2017 Author Posted August 18, 2017 11 minutes ago, ilv said: Sorry I'm late. It's nice. It just feels a little too short and incomplete. Why? Short.... it is. But I don't feel it incomplete. I said what I wanted and that's all. Quote
Luis Hernández Posted August 18, 2017 Author Posted August 18, 2017 1 hour ago, ilv said: Okay. I'm nuts... No, I don't think so.... It's just that sometimes I only want to express something very specific, and the length of the piece is secondary. Quote
markstyles Posted August 29, 2017 Posted August 29, 2017 7/8 time and 7 flats... you are not fooling around.. Actually very enjoyable.. and the time signature is great.. I had trouble counting it out myself.. (I need more practice.) Melodically - right on.. you never cease to surprise me, at your technical processes of your varied offerings. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.