Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A short etude I wrote today while taking a break from larger works.  I actually thought it came out pretty nice considering I wrote it in less than a day with is really unusual for me.  Score is attached but forgive the untidiness.

MP3
0:00
0:00
PDF
Posted
16 minutes ago, ilv said:

Nice little piece.  I noticed some potentially mistakes in terms of how the notes fit together (harmony). If you need further explanation, please let me know.

 

I'd appreciate that!  I'm sure I have a few false notes here and there I wouldn't mind polishing it up a little.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Luis Hernández said:

Like it. It goes so fast that I almost don't perceive the difference in the right hand when it is staccato. For me is a kind of motivic ostinato with changes in the left hand.

 

Thanks!  That's the way I approached it with a simple rhythmic motive with overlying arpeggios.

Posted

Very nice!

I like the contrast between staccato and normal (sostenuto) and legato. Furthermore, I appreciate it that you composed an etude that is meant to improve the pianist's, but also sounds like joyful music. As a classical saxophonist, I had to learn A LOT boring etudes that were basically just scales or triads... This does not promote the motivation to practice two hours a day.

Well done!

I am curious: can you play it yourself?

Posted
On 9/3/2017 at 4:09 PM, Maarten Bauer said:

Very nice!

I like the contrast between staccato and normal (sostenuto) and legato. Furthermore, I appreciate it that you composed an etude that is meant to improve the pianist's, but also sounds like joyful music. As a classical saxophonist, I had to learn A LOT boring etudes that were basically just scales or triads... This does not promote the motivation to practice two hours a day.

Well done!

I am curious: can you play it yourself?

 

Thanks for the comments!   Unfortunately, I am a mediocre violinist and can't play piano at all though I think this is playable at the indicated tempo. 

Posted
On 9/3/2017 at 4:30 PM, ilv said:

I would first fix what you believe is incorrect. Some of the spots I found:
0:4: parallel octave
0:10: the right hand should probably play an E rather than D#
0:11 and 0:12: D# in left hand not appropriate, that progression sounds harsh
0:18: E preferred over D#
0:29: C# preferred over D#
0:52: a diminished triad is not nice, so I think the lower B in the right hand should probably be a C#

 

Thanks.  I identified and fixed what I think were the more glaring offenders.  I appreciate your pointing them out to me!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...