Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just find this confusing. It has a pretty clear AABB form, but harmonically and rhythmically it just kind of jumps around, with kind of an odd regard to nonfunctional harmony. Perhaps without all the leaps in your "melody" in the A section would be a little more coherent. The B section made more sense.

Posted

My purely subjective take: The first part is rhythmically more pleasing than the second one. Especially the triplet build-up in measure 6 and its resolution in measure 7 are very convincing to me. The second part is definitely more melodic; but those melodies do not sound like they are belonging to the same piece than the first part. An odd contrast to the rhythmic first part. The fast figures in m.11 and 15 also didn’t fit well for my ears.  I think my different take than Monarcheon’s stems from the fact that the start of the piece evoked different expectations in me.  

That said, I enjoyed the piece and have listened several times to it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...