Luis Hernández Posted December 25, 2017 Posted December 25, 2017 It's interesting to study these dances, their rhythms, etc.... I wrote this just to learn. They don't follow the baroque rules about form or harmony. Some people ask me to write the chord names, so I leave them. 1 Quote
markstyles Posted December 25, 2017 Posted December 25, 2017 Very nice.. I marvel at what you accomplish with grace, and not an over abundance of notes. Thanx for the chords too. it helps me to understand what is happening. I start a composition with blocked piano chords, in my DAW, which is removed/muted after a few tracks.. As I add individual parts, I notice I change the original chords. The chords become more complex, and sometimes mutate into a related, but different chord.. Thanx Quote
Monarcheon Posted December 26, 2017 Posted December 26, 2017 Cool. The second movement's time signature should probably just be 3 instead of 3/4 for all the hemiolas you write in, since the notation of changing them wasn't really a thing yet. Some of your chords seem to be working under functional harmony rather than empirical harmony, which is fine, just something to note. It's a little bit inconsistent sometimes with your NC markings. Nice stuff. Quote
Luis Hernández Posted December 26, 2017 Author Posted December 26, 2017 Thanks. It was interesting writing this piece. Yes, some chords were changed after they were notated and I was lazy to make the video again. But it's not very important. Quote
Maarten Bauer Posted December 28, 2017 Posted December 28, 2017 Beautiful suite! I like how you combine old, baroque, with the new. The harmonies are very inventive and I think that the rythms are splendid. Very well done! I enjoyed it. 1 Quote
Oliver Nosaczynski Bohovič Posted December 28, 2017 Posted December 28, 2017 I like this a lot! The counterpoint is excellent here and I like how is really leads somewhere, it doesn't bore me one bit. Well done! Quote
PeterthePapercomPoser Posted October 4, 2020 Posted October 4, 2020 Nice! I didn't know you composed dances as well! It's cool to hear a more modern approach to these old dances. Even having composed quite a few of these myself - I am no expert as this is quite a wide field of study. Given that - I do have some points that you are free to ignore if you disagree with of course. I think the Courante as you have it ventures a bit too frequently into a 6/8 hemiola which makes it momentarily sound like it's a Gigue. That part of it just seemed out of character for a Courante. Also your Allemande to me sounded more like a Gavotte in tempo and general approach. As I understand it Allemande's are supposed to be a bit slower and have an anacursis of between 2 or 3 sixteenth-notes (although that's free to interpretation - the important thing to note is that in an Allemande sixteenth notes are expected to pass slowly enough that it would still sound dance-like). I don't know if I've ever heard a Musette as an independent dance like this - I thought it would usually appear as a section of another dance like the trio is a section of a minuet. When I search for Musette I get a Wikipedia article that says that Schoenberg composed a suite in which one of the movements was an independent Musette. I wrote a Musette once as part of my Gigue in Eb and the way I understood it there was that it was a contrasting section of a Gigue that was supposed to imitate the drone of bagpipes. I thought your Sarabande and Gigue were quite appropriate in manner and tempo. Nice job overall! I always enjoy listening to these quirky little specimens. 1 Quote
Luis Hernández Posted October 4, 2020 Author Posted October 4, 2020 14 hours ago, PaperComposer said: Nice! I didn't know you composed dances as well! It's cool to hear a more modern approach to these old dances. Even having composed quite a few of these myself - I am no expert as this is quite a wide field of study. Given that - I do have some points that you are free to ignore if you disagree with of course. I think the Courante as you have it ventures a bit too frequently into a 6/8 hemiola which makes it momentarily sound like it's a Gigue. That part of it just seemed out of character for a Courante. Also your Allemande to me sounded more like a Gavotte in tempo and general approach. As I understand it Allemande's are supposed to be a bit slower and have an anacursis of between 2 or 3 sixteenth-notes (although that's free to interpretation - the important thing to note is that in an Allemande sixteenth notes are expected to pass slowly enough that it would still sound dance-like). I don't know if I've ever heard a Musette as an independent dance like this - I thought it would usually appear as a section of another dance like the trio is a section of a minuet. When I search for Musette I get a Wikipedia article that says that Schoenberg composed a suite in which one of the movements was an independent Musette. I wrote a Musette once as part of my Gigue in Eb and the way I understood it there was that it was a contrasting section of a Gigue that was supposed to imitate the drone of bagpipes. I thought your Sarabande and Gigue were quite appropriate in manner and tempo. Nice job overall! I always enjoy listening to these quirky little specimens. Hi. Probably it is all as you say, I can't remember.... I wanted to study this baroque forms and I read from many sources. The information you get is different and didn't find absolute terms. I tried to follow the rhythms and tempi supposed to use, but al last, I always do what I want at the moment of writing. I don't care much about how to call every piece of the suite, perhaps I had to name them as 1, 2, 3, etc... Because in "contemporary thinking" you take the essence or just a tangent feature of a form and from that point, you develop a different type music. If not, take a look at Schönberg's Mussete, from Op. 25. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.