Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For any theory or choral nerds out there, I would really appreciate anyone looking over this piece looking for parallel 5th's, 8va's, etc. or incorrect dissonance treatment. I've wracked my brains enough on it, and I know I'm missing something. Thanks for any help or comments!

MP3
0:00
0:00
Posted

Nice work , Blaire.  Here are the possible problems I saw.

m8-  harmonically sop and bass c to e.  Not sure if the passing tones negate the parallel movement. this may or may not be.

m28-  alto and bass

m29 into 30-  alto bass

m31 into 32- again alto bass.  This may be another passing tone situation.

My only other observation is regarding our time signature.  You've notated cut time, could it be 4/2 instead?

Again, very nice work.  Hope this helps.

  • Like 1
Posted

@tmarko Thank you so much! The 4/2 markd 2/2 is just for some reason common in Renaissance style. Even Brahms uses it in his Requiem (3rd movement). I think it's because the longa is being split in two, as opposed to the breve.

Posted

This is the version that ended up being submitted.

MP3
0:00
0:00

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...