Jared Steven Destro Posted February 28, 2019 Posted February 28, 2019 With this piece, I wanted to explore the application of the five classical canons of rhetoric to music. These canons serve as an inspiration in some way to each of the movements; here, the first -- invention -- has its own form, and it also relates to "invention" in the musical sense, i.e. two-part counter-point (section F). It is also the literal act of producing material that can be used later in the work; I am still working on the following movements. Let me know your thoughts! MP3 Play / pause JavaScript is required. 0:00 0:00 volume > next menu Op. 19 – I. Invention > next PDF Op. 19 – I. Invention 1 Quote
MeisterSegarra Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 I only have heard like two of your posts here on the forums and I gotta say that you succsesfully mixed the "playful" melodic elements from the Classical period with contemporary harmony. Interesting and well done Quote
Jared Steven Destro Posted March 13, 2019 Author Posted March 13, 2019 11 hours ago, MeisterSegarra said: I only have heard like two of your posts here on the forums and I gotta say that you succsesfully mixed the "playful" melodic elements from the Classical period with contemporary harmony. Interesting and well done Thanks very much for the comment! Quote
PeterthePapercomPoser Posted March 30, 2021 Posted March 30, 2021 Very cool! I love the almost hypnotic repetition of your main theme. Listening to this without looking at the score I did not detect this feature of this piece but you seem to constantly play around with/manipulate the weak and strong beats at the resolution of the 8th note. Like Tchaikovsky's Pizzicato Ostinato movement in his 4th Symphony or Stravinsky's F# major Etude from opus 7, you seem to shift your rhythms by an 8th note and stress the weak beats but you seem to do this in such a consistent way that the weak beats actually become the strong beats and no syncopation actually occurs. I am puzzled by why composers do this as it seems to create no detectable difference in the performance as long as the performers realize what is happening and play it with the correct beats stressed. But why would you write it that way instead of the simpler alternative of placing the strong beats where they belong and then adding in an 1/8 measure where appropriate? Very cool piece but if you could answer that question I'd be really grateful! Thanks for sharing! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.