Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Actually, this is a nice piece. The two instruments talk to each other efficiently.

I have some comments on

- The broken triplets are a bit odd in m. 19-24

- However the sextplets in m. 55... are nice

- Why so many octaves (doubling) in the bass? A matter of taste, I always keep them for special moments.

- Not sure about so many parallel fifths with the violin in . 77-89 Not because of the sonority, which I like, but because I think fifths are difficult to play in strings.

- Finally, the cuadruple stops followint the above are excesive (and playable?).

  • 1 month later...
Posted

The main thing I hear is that some of your more intense violin passages are kind of understated by the tempo. More specific marking might be necessary in the part for better representation of its role within the texture. The adagio at 90 is another example, but a little different since the violin is realistically only holding two out of the four of those notes.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...