Markus Boyd Posted November 25, 2019 Posted November 25, 2019 (edited) Over the next week or so, I am going to be conducting an analysis on Carl Friedrich Abel's Symphony No. 6 in E-Flat Major, Op. 7, WKO 18. Those familiar with some of my posts will be somewhat familiar with some of the terminology which I will be using. This type of analysis has been introduced by musicologist Robert Gjerdigen, who offers an accessible means to understand music that one may otherwise gawk at in puzzlement. Put simply, this approach understands music not by codes and formulas, but patterns. I listen extensively to music from this period, and I can attest that once you are familiar with the more common patterns, they will be instantly recognizable to the ear. I will post one movement at a time. If there is the interest and engagement in this sort of thing, I will look to do more. I suppose my somewhat ambitious direction with this is to develop a thriving educational hub, for there is not really any internet community dedicated to this form of musical analysis. Here is the work for those who would like to have a listen before I go into the detail (a little history: this work was attributed to the young Mozart by Modern Musicologists when they discovered his name on the manuscript). He had in fact copied it note for note, most likely as a learning exercise). Edited June 7, 2020 by Markus Boyd Analysis of thematic material upload PDF IMSLP25829-PMLP01505-sinfonia_no_3Carl Friedrich Abel symphony analysis final draft Quote
Mister Red Posted June 3, 2020 Posted June 3, 2020 (edited) I like Gjerdingen. I have his Galant style book. Interesting to look at these things from the schemata p.o.v.. I have a Partimenti book that is a good companion to it. I liked the piece you posted, too. Edited June 3, 2020 by Mister Red Quote
Markus Boyd Posted June 3, 2020 Author Posted June 3, 2020 9 hours ago, Mister Red said: I like Gjerdingen. I have his Galant style book. Interesting to look at these things from the schemata p.o.v.. I have a Partimenti book that is a good companion to it. I liked the piece you posted, too. Is your companion book by Giorgio Sanguinetti, perchance? I had forgotten about this post but did complete an overview of the above work. I need to post this sometime soon. It’s a good piece to analyze for schematics as it is structured in such a way that it is quite clear and obvious. If you have investigated Gjerdigen’s work, have you tried your hand at pastiche composition? Quote
Guillem82 Posted June 3, 2020 Posted June 3, 2020 Hi Markus, thanks for posting! That's a very interesting topic. Music analysis is sometime tough, but very usefull to understand form and the background patterns of music. As you know, I'm very interested in Gjerdingen analysis and Partimenti, because I think are two powerfull tools to understand Galant Music and compose in such a style. I'm looking forward to your analysis 🙂 Best wishes! Quote
Guillem82 Posted June 3, 2020 Posted June 3, 2020 I was just looking on Youtube, because I reminded me something I've heard before...You are right, The same symphony appears in Mozart's catalog 😅 Quote
Mister Red Posted June 3, 2020 Posted June 3, 2020 9 hours ago, Markus Boyd said: Is your companion book by Giorgio Sanguinetti, perchance? If you have investigated Gjerdigen’s work, have you tried your hand at pastiche composition? I didn't get the Sanguinetti. I know it's definitive, but I wanted a more directly practical account for the time being so I got the Ijzerman book. It's also got a nice companion website. To your second question: Not as of yet. By the way, in the piece you posted by Abel, that is one of the best bassoon parts I've ever come across, even regardless of period. Quote
Markus Boyd Posted June 3, 2020 Author Posted June 3, 2020 (edited) Here is my analysis of the thematic materiel of the first movement. I hope you find some of the comparisons with other musical literature interesting. These things take some time so bear with me on the rest of the work. PS - Some of my annotations on the score might not be correct, but I haven't the time to edit everything right now, and the PDF annotations are tedious to say the least! Edited June 7, 2020 by Markus Boyd Quote
Mister Red Posted June 4, 2020 Posted June 4, 2020 That's very good. Lots of work. Schemata breakdowns really provide an interesting view. Wish I’d have know about this when I was first starting to study composition. Quote
Guillem82 Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 Hi Markus, wow, that's a very deep analysis what you did. I've been analysing some classic Allegro-Sonata movements in the last few days, but just focusing on the formal structure...Yours is much more complete 😅. Thanks for sharing it! 1 Quote
bishnoi12w Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) I am going to be conducting an analysis on Carl Friedrich Abel's Symphony No. 6 in E-Flat Major, Op. 7, WKO 18. Those familiar with some of my posts will be somewhat familiar with some of the terminology which I will be using. This type of analysis has been introduced by musicologist Robert Gjerdigen, who offers an accessible means to understand music that one may otherwise gawk at in puzzlement. Put simply, this approach understands music not by codes and formulas, but patterns. I listen extensively to music from this period, and I can attest that once you are familiar with the more common patterns, they will be instantly recognizable to the ear. 9apps Edited January 23 by bishnoi12w Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.