Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Following a relatively long pause in my compositional schedule over the summer, I have once more set myself to work, and to my surprise, my contrapuntal skills haven't been as affected as I would have otherwise expected. Thus I have spent the Halloween eve composing this fugue, based on a previously abandoned yet still fairly recent subject.

I would say I'm rather happy with how this one in particular turned out: four different pedal points, two stretti, and a number of episodes I haven't even bothered to count, perhaps fearing that I might come to unfoundedly disdain it as too repetitive. Who knows.

Anyhow, here it is. Happy Halloween everyone!

Halloween Fugue in G-sharp minor. - YouTube

 

Edited by Fugax Contrapunctus
MP3
0:00
0:00
PDF
  • Like 2
Posted

I enjoyed this piece a lot. The subject is very catchy and has personality.

However my overall feeling is that there is a high dense texture. I thin this is because the three voices are in the score all the time, it's usual to let some of them rest here and there to change the texture. Also, the figures are similar, and quick, perhaps one voice in some moments could take longer notes. In fact, when the bass works in octaves (why not in a fixed note?) there is some relief. 

The final part (tempo di cadenza) has no sense to me...

Fugues are always difficult....

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Very impressive fugue! You have a great theme and sense of counterpoint. Love the ending as well, a good break for the fugual texutre. Where you really shine is in your episodes. My only cirtic is:

- This soundes baroque, is there a reason for that key?

- I agree with Luis, the reason why your episodes are perfect is because you dont overuse the counterpoint, its mor immitative and calm. The rest of the fugue your counterpoint is very heavy, draw some inspiration form buxtehude 😉

 

Overall great work, im very impressed

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/19/2022 at 11:18 PM, Simen-N said:

- This sounds baroque, is there a reason for that key?

My fugal subjects generally come to mind with a specific key already associated with them, regardless of whether it would be more stylistically acurate to transpose them to less daunting keys. In this case, I guess it could simply be transposed to G minor. On the other hand, however, I generally try to balance out between keys I may have already finished fugues for and those that I haven't devised any compositions for, therefore, since I already have a couple fugues in G minor, I saw no reason to transpose this fugue to said key and instead left it at G-sharp minor.

Thank you so much for your feedback!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...