jwpianist Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 Looking for feedback on form, development, and overall cohesiveness. The labeling of various modes and other features is due to this being a project in Music Theory class at my university. MP3 Play / pause JavaScript is required. 0:00 0:00 volume > next menu apparitions v3 > next PDF apparitions v3 1 Quote
Omicronrg9 Posted December 30, 2023 Posted December 30, 2023 Hi again JW. When dealing with exercises, I am not too sure of what specific feedback would serve you. Specially, structurally speaking, in case there are conscious choices made by the composer in that regard, my feedback may be contrary to what you want to do or what the people reviewing the project would expect your work to be. What I listen is cohesive enough to me (transitions between phrases aren't unjustifiably abrupt or random), structurally clear (with some non-directional digression more than grand development; a wise choice I believe) and subjectively speaking it has many moments which I liked, melodically and sub-structurally. The melodic line appearing various times in the lower voice (Measures 1-2) and the smooth increase of tension from M32 to M36 (increasing the density of the music by adding a new voice on each bar) are two of those examples. The ending was really satisfying. Simple and effective. Sorry I couldn't be of anymore help. Kind regards, Daniel–Ømicrón. Quote
ComposaBoi Posted January 25 Posted January 25 I quite like the atmosphere it creates. I especially enjoyed the central section where it built in tension. I don't know what the exercise specified or what constraints or goals may have been set, but imo I didn't think that a reprise of the earlier material toward the end was the most effective decision. I personally feel that continuing going in new directions with the established texture would have worked better. But that's just what I felt, and again, I have no idea what the exercise was for. Quote
Luis Hernández Posted January 25 Posted January 25 I think the point, as has been discussed, is that an exercise is not the same as a "composition". Here there is a certain diversity of different styles that are approached without transition. But I am more struck by a question that, I think, happens to many of us. And that is that these modal harmonies should not necessarily sound classical or "old". The good thing is to apply them to sonorities that are modern. And difficult. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.