Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is something I decided to work on for a very limited amount of time over the past two days for the Christmas Event this year!  It's a variations piece on the famous Polish Christmas Carol "Gloria in excelsis Deo".  Those eponymous words are actually in Latin, but the rest of the carol is in Polish, and I made sure to go in and include all the proper accent marks and special characters which is actually a little tricky to enter into Musescore.  This is one of those rare pieces that I wish I had Cantamus for, since it would increase the realism of the piece to have the actual words sung, especially when the Tenors and Basses are in canonic imitation with the Sopranos and Altos.  I would really appreciate any comments, critiques, feedback or even just observations that you may have.  Thanks for listening and Merry Christmas!

MP3
0:00
0:00
PDF
  • Like 3
Posted

The harmony and dynamics are really awesome. The harmony starts off pretty tame but I really enjoy how it deviates from the norm, and gets adventurous. I think the choir samples don't really do you justice though about halfway through. And Cantamus may be better for vocalization and accuracy, but most likely wouldn't come close to sounding as good as some higher quality choir samples that can sound out specific vowel sounds.

As far as the lyrics, a minor critique (and I only know this because I am in the process of creating lyrics in Music Jotter). When you split a word between beats, the hyphen is used for this split, rather than the space.

1:20, are these parallel 4ths or 5ths? If so, was this intentional?

And I really love the part at 0:50. You were able to get this part sounding pretty realistic especially with the crescendo!

  • Like 2
Posted

Like Henry, I would have liked the piano to come back, but as is it serves as a nice intro to the piece. 

I'm curious on the form. It feels unfinished to me, like you were experimenting with reharming a tune you knew well. Why only two variations, and why the ones you chose? I'm assuming it's because you were having fun with a just for fun thing we do here, but maybe you'll add variations in the future? Is it because variations can get stale after a while?

Doesn't matter really. You have a way with harmony, and this was no exception. Well done mate 👍 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Thatguy v2.0 said:

I'm curious on the form. It feels unfinished to me, like you were experimenting with reharming a tune you knew well. Why only two variations, and why the ones you chose? I'm assuming it's because you were having fun with a just for fun thing we do here, but maybe you'll add variations in the future? Is it because variations can get stale after a while?

Well, all my variations projects tend to snowball into giant projects and I didn't want that to happen with this piece.  I just wanted it to be a short Christmas diversion before going back to my main variation work that I'm working on right now which is much more substantial.  It's possible that I'll pick this piece up again in the future.  Thanks for listening and commenting!

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...