Willibald Posted January 25 Posted January 25 (edited) Like many trio sonatas, this work consists of four movements: slow - fast - slow - fast. It starts with a three-partite Grave with a slight hint of French ouvertures, though then developing in a different direction. The second movement is a fugue. I am rather fond of a moment where all voices stop and the recorder and violin start the conversation of voices anew, and more lucid than before. The third movement is a through-composed Adagio, followed by a fugal finale in 12/8. This trio sonata is written for alto recorder, violin, cello and harpsichord, but a variety of instruments would fit too, though it leads to interesting changes in the character of the individual movements. I am not sure if the Grave and the Adagio shouldn't be swapped to increase the coherence of the music. Any suggestions welcome. Edited January 28 by Willibald updated files MP3 Play / pause JavaScript is required. 0:00 0:00 volume > next menu Trio Sonata gmin 1 Grave (Willibald) Trio Sonata gmin 2 Allegro (Willibald) Trio Sonata gmin 3 Adagio (Willibald) Trio Sonate gmin 4 Allegro moderato (Willibald) > next PDF Trio Sonata g minor (Willibald) 1 Quote
muchen_ Posted January 28 Posted January 28 It's a lovely trio sonata. My favourite movement is the 2nd. The subject is interesting and your treatment of it is very successful throughout, with a well-planned structure. I would personally omit the re-exposition before the stretto entries, and expand on the stretto material - I think it's here a contrapuntal goldmine that is somewhat underexplored. But overall, the piece is rhythmically varied, motivically tightly-bound, idiomatic, harmonically consistent with the Baroque (I love the Neapolitan chord near the end!), and with well-written counterpoint throughout. For me, the biggest weakness I find is the lack of variety of form. The fourth movement is almost identical to the second from a structure PoV, and the third lacks a formal structure. Principles like binary/canon/ritornello/invention/gallant sonata are all reasonable tools to reach for that will make your movements have greater diversity and contrast. Writing the third movement in a major key helps too! 1 Quote
Willibald Posted January 29 Author Posted January 29 Thanks a lot for your kind words! Indeed, the 2nd movement is my favourite movement as well. Thanks also for your comment regarding variety; this is an area I have to think more about. I wanted to avoid duplicating my trio sonata in C Major (Trio Sonata in C Major), and also to avoid repeating a section. But now, the second half mirrors the first one: Both slow movements are 24 measures long and are structured as A - B - A' (not as clear in the 3rd movement, but still). The fast movements are both fugues with about fifty measures that touch the usual keys. There are differences, for sure, and one could claim it's all on purpose. What I hope for is that as all four movements are rather short, the similarities are not too bothersome. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.