Guest QcCowboy Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 and how about a few works that don't quite fit the mold of "symphony" yet fulfil its expectations? Debussy "La Mer" Rachmaninov "Symphonic Dances" Quote
stepheny Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 sibelius is my hero. I love his symphonies very much for the incomparable sense of form . . . . . I also like nielsen a great deal (especially the 4th). Tippett the British composer: his second is really worth a listen. and Shostakovich of course. Quote
violinfiddler Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Obviously.Mine are the best. Oh how could I forget? They are truly great symphonies, not just of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, but of all periods of art music. lol. Jk Quote
Fredrik Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 So far I've listened to Shostakovich's 5th,9th, Prokofiev's 1st, 5th, Mahler's 5th,6th, Sibelius 1st,2nd(though the 1st was written 1899-1900), and Rachmaninoff's 2nd. What are some other great twentieth century symphonies I should listen to? Shostakovich 7th, the "Leningrad symphony". It's a must...he he! Shostakovich quote; "Real music is always revolutionary..." Fredrik Quote
fabio88 Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Sibelius is another second-rate composer whose music had already become terribly conservative during his own lifetime. I'm convinced that composers like Sibelius and Shostakovich (arguably the most overrated 20th century composer) will eventually come to be seen as "lesser" composers, as the Salieris and Joachim Raffs of their time. Quote
Guest QcCowboy Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Sibelius is another second-rate composer whose music had already become terribly conservative during his own lifetime. I'm convinced that composers like Sibelius and Shostakovich (arguably the most overrated 20th century composer) will eventually come to be seen as "lesser" composers, as the Salieris and Joachim Raffs of their time. Sibelius and Schostakowitch will only be seen as "second rate" by people who do not understand them. I am not the only one to believe that Sibelius' 7th symphony is among the greatest symphonies of the 20th century. Likewise many of Schostakowitch's symphonis, chief among them the 5th, 10th, 13th, 14th. Quote
Daniel Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Many of the 20th century symphonies seem to go in for bombast, and feature large orchestras etc., and I of course enjoy many of these pieces, but one of the smaller beauties is Schoenberg's First Chamber Symphony. I also have to put forward the symphonies of Nielsen, as being, in my opinion, some of the greatest of the 20th century. Quote
fabio88 Posted March 14, 2007 Posted March 14, 2007 Sibelius and Schostakowitch will only be seen as "second rate" by people who do not understand them.I am not the only one to believe that Sibelius' 7th symphony is among the greatest symphonies of the 20th century. Likewise many of Schostakowitch's symphonis, chief among them the 5th, 10th, 13th, 14th. Well, I'm not alone either when I say that Sibelius and Shostakovich will eventually come to be seen as second rate composers. The critical consensus, as well as my own opinion, seems to be that these composers were not very important in the development of 20th century music. A famous critic (forgot his name) once described Shostakovich' music as derivative, empty and second-hand. Bartok didn't think highly of Shostakovich. Similarly, Boulez said something like "it's like olive oil, you have a second and a third pressing - I think of Shostakovich as the second, or even third pressing of Mahler." Do you really think that such great musical minds as Bartok and Boulez didn't "understand" Shostakovich' music, whatever that means. I can see why the music of these composers (Sibelius and Shos) appeals to so many people, but I suspect these composers are only attractive to those who are not yet ready to appreciate the more difficult and more important 20th century music. Quote
Kamen Posted March 14, 2007 Posted March 14, 2007 Sad to see Hindemith missing, so I would add: Symphony in B-flat. Quote
Glassworks Posted March 17, 2007 Posted March 17, 2007 I guess I should add Elgar's 1st Symphony, since I've been listening to it the past few days. I love the Elgar symphony. So few people have actually heard it... My favorite 20th Century Symphonies are DeMeij Symphony No. 2, and Howard Hanson's Symphony No. 2 "Romantic", and Gorecki Symphony No. 2 "Symphony of Sorrowful Songs." Quote
manossg Posted March 17, 2007 Posted March 17, 2007 ...and Gorecki Symphony No. 2 "Symphony of Sorrowful Songs." Just for the record, it's his third symphony! :) Quote
Christopher Dunn-Rankin Posted March 18, 2007 Posted March 18, 2007 Of course, to actually like Hindemith, you have to be a compulsive masturbator... Ahah, I make joke... I'd add the Glass 5, too. Simply for its premise, and its occasional inventive use of text painting. Quote
Idyllic Shepherd Posted March 19, 2007 Posted March 19, 2007 Why the concern with a symphony? Schoenberg's Chamber Symphony!... Kammersymphonie, a great wonderful mesh of ideas. Quote
Glassworks Posted March 19, 2007 Posted March 19, 2007 Lets see... Are we are excluding the Glass and Barber symphonies? Quote
Christopher Dunn-Rankin Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 I'd add the Glass 5, too. See? Quote
Daniel Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 Reading's a wonderful thing; most people don't bother with it. Quote
fabio88 Posted March 21, 2007 Posted March 21, 2007 Lets see... Are we are excluding the Glass and Barber symphonies? Glass' symphonies don't belong on the list of greatest 20th century symphonies. Philip Glass is the most overrated composer of our times. I'd give his entire output for any small chamber piece by Elliott Carter. Eventually, Philip Glass will be remembered as merely a footnote in the history of Western art music. True modern music affectionados and critics have long given up taking his formulaic approach to composing seriously, as Glass - blinded by the commercial success of his mindnumbing doodely-doodely style - keeps on producing the same predictable, trivial, simpleminded, boring earcandy he has been churning out for decades now. Quote
neuhausen Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Glass' symphonies don't belong on the list of greatest 20th century symphonies. Philip Glass is the most overrated composer of our times. I'd give his entire output for any small chamber piece by Elliott Carter. Eventually, Philip Glass will be remembered as merely a footnote in the history of Western art music. True modern music affectionados and critics have long given up taking his formulaic approach to composing seriously, as Glass - blinded by the commercial success of his mindnumbing doodely-doodely style - keeps on producing the same predictable, trivial, simpleminded, boring earcandy he has been churning out for decades now. Just a small observation reading this thread: There are so many wonderful IDEAS and great pieces to check out. Why does it have to be a contest for the best pieces in which we rank the efforts of all these fine composers. Any work that moves the human spirit is a work truly worthy of getting to know! Quote
Christopher Dunn-Rankin Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Glass' symphonies don't belong on the list of greatest 20th century symphonies. Philip Glass is the most overrated composer of our times. I'd give his entire output for any small chamber piece by Elliott Carter. Eventually, Philip Glass will be remembered as merely a footnote in the history of Western art music. True modern music affectionados and critics have long given up taking his formulaic approach to composing seriously, as Glass - blinded by the commercial success of his mindnumbing doodely-doodely style - keeps on producing the same predictable, trivial, simpleminded, boring earcandy he has been churning out for decades now. But are they actually formulaic? Or do they simply point to something beyond the music? His picture operas work to make the music a background or tapestry, rather than a part of the drama. His fifth symphony uses the repetitive rhythms and melodic cells to allow the text to be the focus. I agree that his chamber music and purely orchestral works are ridiculous. But his vocal/opera works are certainly noteworthy. Quote
Gavin Gorrick Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 This is worth bumping and Corigliano 1 is pretty great I also find Shostakovich kind of derivative and overrated, but I can't say that to anyone at the music school for fear of being shanked :( Quote
DAI Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Mahler's 9th Symphony, maybe my favourite piece of all time. The Symphonies by Takashi Yoshimatsu are also very good, you should give him a listen. Quote
Qmwne235 Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Sibelius 7 and Turangalila, in my opinion. I'd definitely also second Schoenberg's Kammersymphonie and Symphony of Psalms. Mahler 10 is an honorable mention. Surprisingly, despite my obsession with Hindemith, I've never heard any of his symphonies, and in general, I prefer his chamber music to his orchestral music. Quote
robinjessome Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 I listened recently to Kurt Weil's Symphony No. 2. It was a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.