The chamber - split discussion

Where do you see me blaming you?

Or rather better, did you read the second part of my post? Have you read my posts that I'm here for educational purposes? To try and give something? Since you don't want it that's fine with me.

You can't deny that you reviewed 2 pieces, gave negative reviews, without listening to both of them whole. It happened. You want to feel ok with it, that's fine. I say it's wrong. I don't care for sorry or whatever, just to make you understand. I don't care for your critics of my music. In all honesty you simply can't understand it, and I've been through this a lot of times. I simply don't care.

You don't like it! That's a fair point! BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD IT!

Anyways, this is getting nowhere. I know that you won't review any of my pieces if you haven't heard it fully! You said so, earlier, and I trust that you will do that, so I'm fine to that.

I will stop caring about educating further...

Never mind really...

I'm not hurt, nor insulted nor anything. Just tired from this whole thread, nothing else

May I be the official one to end this discussion. Seeing as it stemmed from a piece of mine, I believe we have said all we need to say on the matter.

Case closed.

I dont see any rule stating that one must hear the entire work before having to say anything.

Anyways, case closed.

Well Nick...I think that 4 minutes is not a short time, there are works that are shorter then 4 minutes. I was speaking about myself , I

You have singlehandedly proved his point that the young people of today have no attention for music.

Except Saul isn't that young - he's 30 years old.

That's young. Basically, anyone young enough to have easy access to record players and cassette tapes during their first twenty years of life falls into this category.