Lord Skye Posted June 17, 2007 Posted June 17, 2007 I've got violins, double bass, trumpet, horn, trombone, bassoon, oboe, clarinet, flute, harpsichord, marimba and basic orchestral percussion. It doesn't seem like enough to be called an orchestra, plus there's the harpsichord in there. Is there a word for "almost orchestra" things like this? And sorry if this is in the wrong place, I picked the one that made the most sense. Quote
Hands Posted June 17, 2007 Posted June 17, 2007 I would call that an orchestra, in the Baroque/early Classical sense. Quote
Mark Posted June 17, 2007 Posted June 17, 2007 yeah, kind of sounds like a baroque orchestra, but that would depend on the harpsichord being used for continuo, and there being a whole string section, and the wind instruments being used as soloists. Quote
Lord Skye Posted June 18, 2007 Author Posted June 18, 2007 Alright, thanks; chamber orchestra will do, I think. Quote
nikolas Posted June 18, 2007 Posted June 18, 2007 wait. How many violins and Contrabasses? If more than 1 CB, or 2 vlns, then it's not a chamber orchestra. Chamber orchestra is 1 of each (and violin 1 and 2). But it does appear that there is 1 CB, and probalby 2 vlns, so it is a chamber orchestra then! Quote
Lord Skye Posted June 18, 2007 Author Posted June 18, 2007 Why does it matter how many basses and violins are in an orchestra, as long as it's more than one and not all too many? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.